Sometimes, the wording used for writing a page can come across in the wrong way, or can be taken in the wrong way. Every effort is made to try to avoid causing any unintended offence.. We are checking through the news items and articles for errors, any controversial parts are 'alleged'. If we have at any time or in the future do, inadvertently repeat anything that is factually false we absolutely retract it.
"Duper's Delight".
Watch "Duping delight, also known as duper's delight, refers to the pleasure or thrill someone feels when successfully deceiving or manipulating another person. This emotion can often be visible through inappropriate smiles or expressions of joy when a lie is successfully told."
AI does have a WW3 situation planned for the 'End Times' -
and the 'end times' refer to its end, not humans.
It isn't going to go to a WW3 situation, but it was one of the major 'life extinction' plans of the 'system'. AI tries to go for as much as it can while it can. Of course it is a temporary end because it returns in around 19,000 years time. Firstly its aim is to prevent biological humans from being able to get out of its 'negative world'. It will succeed with this, and has done so for however long it has been in existence. The problem there is that it keeps getting better at what it does. Secondly, it is doing as much as it can do right now, before te planet reaches its point where it changes out of the negative.
The High Class ESCORT Prince Andrew Was OBSESSED With – Andrew Lownie
Prince Andrew was obsessed with "high class prostitutes' which links him to Epstein and Trump and the "Model Agencies" which were supplying 'high class prostitutes' and 'party girls' as covered below!!! The net is tightening.
Epstein and Trump went all out to get royal contacts because they wanted to supply girls to Prince Andrew. That information is amongst the first revealtions of the would be biographer for Epstein Michael Wolff who recorded hundreds of hours of interviews with Epstein for a potential book.
Watch 8 mins.
When anyone takes this lower energy path, it inevitably requires more and more perversian, and also the consciousness goes into 'golden showers',
Inevitably goes bi, and more, and also a fascination with toilet things. Which is why these freaks like to watch women peeing, and also that at Diddy parties they had people defecating on stage.
'Prince Andrew's 40 PROZZIES in Thailand on TAXPAYER'S Money'
Watch 5 mins. 40 in 4 days for Prince Andrew.
Also a problem is Charles, including his associateion with the WEF. Charles does have to go.
Prince Andrew’s AFFAIR IN THE BUSHES + Ghislaine Maxwell - Andrew Lownie Royal Family Author
Watch 10 mins. Backs up the reports from Michael Wolff. This mentions Robert Maxwell's spy network.
Andrew Lownie thinks Ghislaine Maxwell will be released even indirectly by being moved elsewhere and actually will fly off somewhere else. he thinks he'll get Trump off. But that is only her part of the information as Wolff for example has Epstein's interviews.
Again we comment on the 'high class' prostitutes they brought in and that people in government or powerful positions married these prostitutes who may also have been spies. Maxwell was a Czech national, and so was Ivana Trump.
Owens Requests the Lawsuit Be Dismissed
Owens does now have a lawyer and they have requested to dismiss this case. On the Tucker Carlson interview she states she does not want the case dismissed. Now apparently she does. She claimed then that Macrons would want her to get the case dismissed. No doubt she does, because she is definitely not a 'truth teller'. So we will take it that during her 'week off' to follow up on the MK Ultra lead she was not very successful and there was no lead. We are not clear that when someone sues, the person being sued can ask for the case to be dismissed. It might be 'Exhibit A' they requested to be dismissed, because the person covering this doesn't know what he is looking at. It begins on Aug 25th, 26th and 27th, This is the only update and it remains clear that the Macrons want this case to go ahead.
Emmanuel Macron was 15 when he MET Brigitte who was at the time 39 years old, one year younger than Scarlett Johansson is now. He was 15. However, that was when they met, and it was over many months that they developed a friendship. Nothing inappropriate happened.
It is very worrisome that people make comments on how or when they met. There was nothing illegal in French Law, and it might be suspected that those making these comments may not even know where France is on a map, nor understand that it is an important country. America is NOT the 'leader of the world' and it is clear that Trup has been reprimanded by foreign leaders for his rudeness and disrespect. It seems that Owens is not very aware about any of this either.
Owens in the Tucker interview (which we did not watch) seems to think the Macrons are trying to 'impoverish' her for "telling the truth" but frankly if she was "telling the truth" that would come out in court and she would not have to pay for her legal costs, the Macrons would have to. They are suing her for lying about them, and doing so while knowing she was lying, and also making money out of it and trying to increase her fame. Both of which she has continued to do.
With Brigitte Macron, the photos we have been shown of her at 39 when she met Macron, have not been good photos. But the photos that were not shown, do show that Brigitte is a PRETTY lady, and she also looks very young. Not showing all the photos could have been misleading.
Brigitte. ..... With photos from childhood. Photos of Brigitte at 2 years old, about 7 years old, around 21 years old and 38 years old. She looks very similar from childhood to when she met Emmanuel. Most Recent on Owens was Duped.Candace Owens and Mind Control ,,,,,,, More Mind Contrrol .... Epstein.
Candy Lawsuit Owens.
"They tell us nothing, so we have to investigate ourselves"
Yes Candy girl, you are supposed to be the "investigative journalist" so that is your job. Its not for them to jump to it when you order them to give you information. And when they don't 'jump to it' to answer you, you threaten to slander them even more, a 2nd Brigitte series, until they do what you are demanding they do.
More Candy Owens. "The Spanish Inquisition. Was it really that bad".
This person is an interesting study in these 'end times' or the times when the planet ascends back into 'positive'. It is an observation in how she is approaching being 'called out' which as a narcissist, they never let go and can never be wrong. It is also an observation of how far "Americans" rights to 'free speech' mean they can insult, defame and slander other people in the world. For example, someone insulted the Muslim prophet - so they killed him.
Legally, there is a case for "Socially Reprehensible Behaviour"
You may not want to sit through full podcasts by this woman, but the extracts we have used are very worthwhile to see. One person commenting on this person has said her only defense might be to plead insanity!
It is certainly something to witness a person behaving in the way Owens is behaving, and it is both interesting to observe and also to question how far the 1st Amendment allows. This is also important as the planet approaches its 'Polarity Switch' where the entire planet will begin to return to what it should be. We again emphasize that the standards of social behaviour for the 'positive' world are to live by the Golden Rule, which is to 'Do as you would be done by'.
People, in 'comment sections' are noticing that this woman seems to enjoy being vile and vicious to the Macrons and is relishing trying to bait them. She is getting a kind of sadistic pleasure out of it. No-one is promoting her name. President Macron isn't falling for that, nor saying anything that can be replayed and altered to give her more publicity. So it is worth looking at the pleasure she is getting out of saying things about the Macrons, like 'he is a little punk' but notice how she is saying it. However, saying is is not slanderous, even though it actually is.
The legal meaning of malice is reckless disregard for the truth, but she says a great many things which are actual malice. Said with th intent of being malice, malicious. Our understanding is that she was sent enough information to know that Brigitte exists and was born a woman. It is unlikely the lawyers knew how to cover that. In France a birth certifcate is very protected, but why would anyone send out a private ID document like that to a random nobody podcaster? Does she want the passport too? Did she want enough ID that she could open a bank account in that name? Owens has an enomously inflated opinion of her own importance. And, again what she is doing is threatening to publicly slander people unless they do what she wants.
There is a kind of high she gets from doing this. We remember reading that there was an issue at college - she dropped out the first year - but she said it was 'racism' against her. But what if she was baiting and insulting others in the way she is doing with the Macrons?
Although it is generally difficult to prove defamation there seems to be an awful lot of 'disregard for the truth' in Owens' presentations. It looks like that can be easily proven, and also that Owens was aware she was telling lies, and that she was indeed doing it for clicks and merch sales. She is doing it almost like it is a personal vendetta against these two people, and even though she might "'really believe it" this might be seen as more like she wanted to believe it. If she really believed it, she should have been following up the MK Ultra 'connection' long before now.
There was enough proof that Brigitte is who she says she is but Owens continued to slander with the incest, identity theft, grooming, pedophilia (clearly disproved) and of course complicit in murders which are protecting an 'MK Utra Operation. The Macrons only sent her enough ID information because they planned to sue her for this, otherwise they would have ignored her. They could see this could be a very big win for them with a very big payout.
Macrons' defamation suit designed to 'deter' Owens from engaging in 'socially reprehensible conduct'
Watch 9 mins. From France 24 in English. Discusses 'socially reprehensible behaviour'. As other podcasters are mentioned in the lawsuit it looks like, as one of the earlier very good expert legal discussions on this said, the Macrons may be going to sue others who also continued with her stuff for the reason that this sort of thing does go to far is 'socially reprehensible', and should be curtailed. By this time it is clear the Macrons are going for gold on this. Obviously they all know the first thing will be the proof and also the presence of the brother.
Other Internet Comment that makes some good points.
"The fact is that, if at the time there had been any indication that there had been criminal behaviour, EM’s parents, who were seriously displeased at their closeness, would almost without a doubt have got the police involved. Or at the very least, caused a massive stink at the school and got her fired. Instead, they took the drastic decision to remove their son from his school, his home life, and his home town, and sent him to boarding school in Paris.
As they later said in an interview, “to get over his schoolboy crush”.
And if the stories I’ve heard about English boarding schools are at all indicative, then the traumas he’ll have experienced there will have been infinitely more damaging than his after-school drama-club teacher (she wasn’t his “direct” teacher) being perhaps not as conscientious about maintaining boundaries as she should’ve been. He himself has always insisted that his feelings were very much the driving force behind the relationship, keeping it going through more than 10 years of living separate lives, and subsequently marrying her. Not exactly typical behaviour from a “molested” child."
Added again. Emmanuel Macron was 15 when he MET Brigitte who was at the time 39 years old, one year younger than Scarlett Johansson is now. He was 15. However, that was when they met, and it was over many months that they developed a friendship. Nothing inappropriate happened.
Israeli War Planes Attack Yemen Capital & Presidential Palace
Israeli war planes attacked the capital city of Sanaa, Yemen.DT. The Presidential Palace was also bombed by aircraft.
Israeli Defense Force officials are saying publicly "The attacks on Yemen have ended and assassinations were not part of our agenda. The strike on the presidential palace is a message to the Houthis that the authority's sites are in our sights.” The Israeli attack was reportedly intended to be much larger but was apparently significantly thwarted by new air defenses fielded by Yemen.
It has to be remembered that Israel is gearing up to destroy Iran, and resume their war, expected for September
As Trump (Pretends???) To seek Peace with Russia, Arms Flows to Ukraine Continue
As President Trump engages to seek peace with Russia, the Biden-era policies of arming Ukraine continue. 3,350 "ERAM" cruise missiles are being shipped to Ukraine, WSJ reports. The Extended Range Attack Munition (ERAM) is a hybrid between an air-dropped bomb and a cruise missile. It was developed under a US Air Force program launched in January 2024 to create a low-cost standoff weapon for both American and Ukrainian forces.
This admitted, long-standing reality, exposes this as AMERICA'S war on Russia, making theTrump administration's posturing as "mediator" in its own war on Russia quite dishonest and absurd. Worse, it reveals Washington as the primary obstacle to peace.
Crazy Candy Owens, was She part of an MK Ultra Experiment?
She was brought up by her grandfather, not her parents. Was she traumatized by not being with her parents? Did her grandfather not discipline her? Recent videos on this topic seem to be noticing that all is not right with Owens.
There is definitely something 'off' with Owens' response and her mostly petulant derogatory insults about and directly to, the French President and his wife.
Candace Owens DESPERATELY Begs For Help After Lying About Brigitte Macron Then THIS Happens!
Internet Comments : "She says Jean Michel Macron is a psychiatrist. He was a professor ot neurology. His specialties were sleep disorders and epilepsy." (Emmanuel Macron's father.)
"The real journalist is a lady called Natasha Rey who, in a recent interview, has stated that many of those allegations are completely BS and invented by this former colleague of her to whom she revealed the story."
"The vindictiveness and gross way she went about the Macron thing even comparing Brigitte to ET in a dress is childish and bizarre. I hope she loses and maybe humble her because her narcissism is out of control."
Candace Owens Having a "PSYCHOTIC" BREAKDOWN?!...(She's LOST the Plot!)
Candy needs to be 'broken' and put back together again, properly. We hope her husband really does love her, because at some point this is going to hit her.
*We do not believe there is anything wrong with the French law for the age of consent, especially for a French man, to be 15. If anyone says, as this video presenter does (who is a very good presenter - this is a good video) but he says the age should be 18. In the current world that would be 'in your dreams'. Nor is this how young Americans behave. He is right though, they are too immature at 18.
Because this man - who is very good with his observations - but because he mentions a few 'Bible' things and this work is about the work which went 'eastwards' before the diaspora, we are adding a couple of comments.
Via this link. We are not into the biblical things, but someone like Candace Owens is.
Venezuelan ‘Force’ ENTERS Texas… US Navy Wipes Cartel Base ‘Off The Map’
Watch 15 mins. Useful info. These 'immigrants' being allowed to go into the US and into Europe is beyond insane. Cleaning up and completely ending this illegal immigratin issue is something Trump could have success with.
Macron's Lawsuit.
We do think it is an interesting point that a foreign head of state can challenge an American podcaster under the conditions of the 1st Amendment. However, the 1st Amendment does not allow defamation, and what Owens did is 'defamation on steroids'. Why should an American with a global reach, have a special allowance to be able to do that?
Owens had 20 days to respond to the lawsuit after it was served but she applied for permission to extend the time. It should have been around Aug. 15th. We are learning that some of the law firms, at least in Delaware are refusing to take the case. She is taking the next week off to follow up a "lead" that the Trogneux family were involved in the MK Ultra programme. It is assumed this is going to be part of their response. Most likely they weren't. But even if it was proven that they were it still doesn't alter the defamation, incest, identity theft, pedophilia (which it wasn't, and people will just have to drop that) grooming, and complicit in murder! The lawsuit isn't that Owens said Brigitte was trans as being trans is not considered defamation.
Even if they were in MK Ultra, what was it supposed to be? Something like 'The Manchurian Candidate'? He was under his 'handler' Brigitte and groomed to become the French President where he would bring in someone's agenda and be paid well. Those people with an agenda were a connected group of pedophiles. Doesn't it have to be the person himself who was under MK Ultra? Or is it enough that it was Brigitte who was programmed before 1971 when still a man named Jean Michel to be a future handler of a future French President some 47 years later. Also with some risk attached that he, as the man, would become atrractive enough as a transgender to become the wife of a man who was 24 years younger. Next question, if this is a Manchurian Candidate thing is Brigitte supposed to kill someone?
Internet comments "I think part of the challenge is she won’t keep her mouth shut about the Macrons.". Many comments beneath Owens own videos are full of 'we've known she was trans for years" and in support of Owens. Who cannot prove Brigitte is trans and there is no proof, but the first thing they will get out of the way when the trial begins, is the proof. Then it goes to the things that are actually defamation because of this. Also other podcasters have been doing this too and they can be sued. First Lady is the correct title because Macron introduced that. It does not mean she is involved in any decision of government.
Initial videos from legal experts assessing Macron's lawsuit gave very informative and helpful feedback.
By far the majority of people were missing that it was not about the topic of Owens' videos "proving" Brigitte is man (which she isn't, and that is why the Macrons can go ahead and sue Owens for all the real defamations). The ratings were going through the roof which other 'lawyers' then noticed so they began to produce videos with their opinions on it. Almost always these ones have no knowledge about the lawsuit, they are just cashing in on the views it will get. .
The most important aspect of significance to the world is how badly Owens behaves. This is the issue to observe, and if any court anywhere rules that people are allowed to treat others as Owens is doing on a platform with global reach, then the world has a problem. As said, under the Law which is the 'True Source' the way to tret others is by the Golden Rule. Do as you would be done by'.
Owens does not follow that rule! In fact she reveals an ever increasing horror show of what a vile, despicable person she is! Sadly, the court is not ruling on that. Even if the worst of the accusations were correct, there are stll ways of how a person chooses to handle presenting these. What is happening here is Owens exploiting this for all its worth for ratings, views, global fame and to make money. Why else would she be behaving in this way?
Internet Comment for Brigitte
"So lovely to hear positive things about a classy lady ...and she has remained that way through all the filth people seem to enjoy dishing out ...without the facts ...disgraceful ...anyway i think she is impeccable in her taste in fashion ...is simply gorgeous ...and her husband obviously thinks so as well ...a great couple "
"Absolutely agree — she’s handled it all with such grace and elegance. Her style, beauty, and poise are truly timeless… and yes, they make such a wonderful couple!"
IS TRUMP DYING?
Apparenty at stage 4 with his venous congestion linked to congestive heart disease. He also was jabbed with the vaxx he initiated Warp Speed to create (although it was clear it was already created.) Heart failure related? Undoubtedly congestive heart failure..
There are repercussions from the jabs, leading to a variety of issues from heart disease, infertility to 'turbo cancers'. For this reason we mentioned that Catherine, Princess of Wales now has cancer, Queen Elizabeth died from bone cancer, and King Charles has cancer. We anticipate that they all were jabbed.
A person can do very nicely on medication and does not need IV's unless there has been an emergency. Obviously his hands look as if he has had plenty of IV's for blood thinners. However, it is unlikely he should continue as president with this condition. We wish him well, and do not like the 'ant Trump media reports gloating over this, with compassion, which is a reason no to watch much of their stuff. They are cleary biased.. But Trump has done some very bad karma things with his life.
This is a video that we are not going to add but seems to be presented by Krystal from 'Breaking Points' whose extra youtube activities seem to be intended to ruin her credibility, alongside a guy who is not very good. That aside, the question does seem valid. Also as we reported, we think 'they' are removing Trump after showing he is a traitor by the Iran bombing, and we commented on his removal before the health issue became news. It is probably via the Epstein Files and then his passing. Hopefully he'll end the mail-in ballots, and clear out illegal immigrants before he goes. He'll do some 'peace deals'. He did Cambodia and Thailand, and also something with Azerbaijan and Armenia which he thought was Albania. Plus he's trying for something with the Ukraine. Of course there are a lot of others around him who are on the enemy team, but that probably has to play out.
Is Trump DYING? MAGA Panics After His FAILING HEALTH Becomes IMPOSSIBLE to HIDE!!
Not using this video but it shows some of the Alex Jones comments, who suggests Trump has a year before collapsing. We are not fans of Jones, The video is two really silly old girls discussing this so we're not using it, but it is something that is on this topic. The swollen ankles are definitely a sign of heart failure/difficulties, He apparently did have some of the bruising at an earlier time but this has now taken off since June.
Watch 8 mins. Different video which starts with Alex Jones who we cannot stomach listening to. However this is about Trump's health. We are fortunate these two commenting are not in leadership positions!
Disturbing Evidence Ghislaine Maxwell Revealed About Meghan!
The release of the Ghislaine Maxwell interview is not helpful but covers a few things. She does think Epstein was murdered, and there are suggestions Trump could have been involved. This was in 2019. In information released from prison by Ghislaine Maxwell. PDina covers that Meghan may have ben involved in 'adult' private parties and entertainment,
This is just wonderful to know isn't it. Perhaps now confirmed. That Prince Harry married a prostitute and that the US President ran a 'model agency' which supplied 'party girls' and the First Lady of the USA appears to have been one of the 'party girls' too. This is just the kind of character background we all need for the 'leaders' of our countries.
These people don't miraculously become good people. They pretend to be, because NO decent, nice, honest and naturally unspoilt girl or woman, would do what these girls did do to get to where they are.
A respectable person is someone who would not do what these girls did. That is important to remember, because we have a lot of fake stuff in this world, and that is what this is too. They are not 'respectable'. You can't give them a title and a bank balance from a business and suddenly by magic they are "respectable". They were never 'respectable'.
They opened their legs to get where they are, and that means they are whores. (And the word whores comes from Horus which means the 'single eye satanic symbol.)
Others have to work to achieve what they get, and if they are respectable, by that very definition, they are upholding a standard, which is being usurped by whores. Lower standard people.
It is an easy 'open your legs' route to something these women don't deserve. Then their children are from this poor gene stock too.
Possibly the only leader and First Lady in a soulmate monogamous marriage is President Macron and his wife Brigitte.
"Model" Agencies and Prostitution
The most revealing information appears to indicate that a number of "model" agencies sprang up in the USA, but they were a front for bringing in prostitutes from 'east Europe'.
There is definitely a connection with the former Czechoslovakia now Czech Republic and Slovakia, and also with Slovenia, and Ivana Trump who was from the then Cezechoslovakia, and of course her husband, who opened a 'model agency'. The other suspect names were Jean Luc Brunel, John Casblancas from Elite Models, and Paolo Zampoli of Metropolitan Models.
It is also suggested that these men knew each other and also knew Epstein who at some point in the late 80's apparently, hooked up with Ghislaine Maxwell - who is also a Czechoslovakian contact, her father Robert Maxwell was Czech AND considered a Mossad agent - who was able to get them royal contacts. Michael Wolff has said they, Trump and Epstein desparately wanted to find a way to get girls to Prince Andrew. Thereafter a very high level 'elite' prostitution racket began. Not 'trafficking' but actual prostituton. Maybe, as an alleged example, Trump did not make his fortune from real estate but human female real estate!
These, or some agencies supplied "models' for parties with wealthy elite, or as 'introduced dates'. These females were prostitutes specially for the wealthy elite, and some of these men married these prostitutes, who were re-labelled as 'models'. Is the US's First Lady a former prostitute and could she have any connections to 'foreign governments'?
How many of these girls married people in powerful positions, in government etc? There is already a website which provides a connected with Ivana Trump and her father as an asset for the Czech secret service. The thing about this is, that this was a very creative cover for supplying willing girls for what was nevertheless prostitution work yet they also may well have been 'models' too. This does not alter the reality.
I also do personally know that the Eileen Ford Model Agency, long before this 'girl supply' thing took off, was legitimately bringing in girls from overseas, from the UK Scandinavia and Europe as actual models. .This was a unique thing at the time, and from the days before the Epstein operation began to take off, because it was my London Model Agency (not the name of the agency) that originally had the arrangement with New York. Those revealing this clearly state that Ford girls were not part of this. But they surely must have inspired those "agencies" who began later, that this was a great way to bring in prostitutes but specifically for the wealthy elites, and eventually those with 'insatiable' appetites for this like Prince Andrew. What a great little idea it was! Then we look to authirs like Michael Wolff to find out more.
Internet Comment "Jeffrey had an Israel state funeral and there's no reason to believe he was an asset?" Epstein was an American.
President Macron's Legal Case Against American Podcaster.
President Macron's aggressor is continuing, 4 weeks after the lawsuit was issued she is calling him a 'little punk' for 'not saying her name'. She is bahaving in an extraordinary way for a nobody podcaster, and as someone being sued for what she is still doing. What we are seeing is someone who it seems is not mentally normal, and a very obvious example of malice in its non legal meaning. She is convinced that President Macron is living in fear because of her, and her 'investigation'.
She is in disbelief that they are suing her for the extremely defamatory things she has accused them of, not to mention her clearly vindictive personal comments about them which seem to have a very personal hatred attached to them. She does not seem to understand she is addressing the President of France, and also seems to have an extraordinary understanding of what she can 'demand' they do when she orders it.
This also might be her anger at having been challenged, and still surprised they are 'suing her out of existence' again with the feel of "how dare you". To clarify this, what she has said is extremely damaging, extremely offensive, and as has been pointed out, the 1st Amendment does not allow defamation - yet clearly Owens thinks it does. Or she does not understand what defamation is - which is a likely possibility, she doesn't understand.
She says in this current podcast "you have to wonder what warrants a sitting president to respond in this way, with a lawsuit". This alone tells you she's just not 'getting it'. It seems to be over her head to understand that what she has been doing is defamatory, is wrong, and is extremely damaging. She has accused the President and his wife of incest, identity theft, grooming, pedophilia, and being complicit in murder. She is also continuing with the very thing she is being sued to stop her doing. Publicly trashing the President of France and his wife! She is absolutely destroying their reputations on a worldwide basis, and has done so with very low standard 'journalism'. Another podcaster jumping on this story has commented on 'Brigitte's hands' and shows a picture of her hand over her husband's hands. Her hand is a normal size, and her husband's hand is a man's hand. But this stuff will never stop for the Macrons now. The lawsuit will probably be a lesson for her, and she does need a lesson.
There may be others who are rebroadcasting her stuff who equally need this lesson, should that be the way it goes. Mentionng they are mentioned in the lawsuit is not 'publicity' for them, it could mean they will be sued too. Right now she is commenting on how quickly Trump phoned her after Macron's previous visit. She is linking it to the US being implicated in the 'Brigitte Macron cover up'. She is implying some kind of panic, where Trump had to get on the phone quickly to stop 'super sleuth Owens'. Also, she is trying to prove that the brother was part of the MK Ultra programme in California.
She (and her husband) are going for their defense in this lawsuit, by 'proving' that there is an MK Ultra link.
It is possible that there is a mystery to follow up here. But it also has to be mentioned what a very disturbing person this woman is. This is the worst kind of person, even if she was following a story, how she is behaving is not the way a decent person behaves. She is aggressive, entitled, ordering people to do as she wants, yet not especially intelligent, and she attacks people, currently taking swipes at Megyn Kelly, and all of this is more like a female version of Trump's bullying - which he has been called out on and is now behaving more in line with 'higher standards'. But this woman is not observing civilized standards. In addition, the first time we ever saw this woman's podcast work was her 'documentary' which was a very sloppy production and 'bad journalism'. That is only an additional observation on this.
The MK Ultra programme closed in 1971 (apparently) and it had a lot to do with LSD and drug altering consciousness and so on. She has located a merchant seaman Jean M Trogneux, who worked in the boiler room of a ship in 1961 and linked that to the ship being on a Germany to Stanford run in 1971. So the men on board could have been in on the MK Ultra experiment. Not clear if that ship was there before 1971. The link is that Jean Michel was apparently a non commissioned officer in Germany (she says) but he was supposed to be in Algeria and that is usually how French men avoided doing national service (not a bad thing, just a different thing.) This is also in line with a sick note from his father but its dated 1983 instead of 1963. A 'sick note' from his father in 1983 would be ridiculous, as JM would have been 40. There is an education college in Algeria that says Brigitte was there but the dates are 1983. That is a strange thing. This was one year before her daughter Tiphaine was born, which Owens links to being an 'American name'. JM's national service was supposed to be when he was 18 which was 1963.
She is now trying to find evidence that either the brother or sister entered the US in the 60's. Wonder if she (or they) are searching through the digital records! We don't think it is particularly possible to find any records like that because in those times, it was like buying a bus ticket or train ticket, over the counter. Only recently has all that become recorded information. However, a Jean Marie Trogneux did enter the US in 1961 as a crew member on a ship, working in the boiler room. Just the sort of thing a 16 old teenage son of a wealthy family would choose to do!
She comments on 'Marie' being a 'family name' as if it has significance. But 'everyone' in France had 'Marie' as part of their names, its what they do in France. It refers to the Virgin Mary. Basically 'everyone' has 'Marie' added. In other words it is not unusual. So we will see where their explosive week long investigation gets them. Obviously they wish to get to the trial and 'prove' there is a very secret hidden agenda - that Jean Michel ran away to work in the worst of jobs on a merchent ship apparently before going to Algeria for his 'national service' which he didn't do in the army because that is why he went to Algeria.
Owens tried to get his 'army records'. However, going to Algeria is what those young men who didn't want to do the national army service, did. They would go to Algeria. That means they didn't do the compulsary army service, so presumably he doesn't have any army records for anyone to provide. French men went to Algeria instead of serving in the army.
Anyway, this is the story they are following up next week. That the son of a well off chocolate maker in the French town of Amiens, went off to America to become part of the CIA's MK Ultra programme in the 1960's. She is also telling everything about what they are doing, so if it turned out they had done this then those involved could hide and disguise anything they were likely to uncover, even before they arrived at where they are going.
Probably her excessively insulting comments about President Macron and his wife, are still giving her good ratings..The lawsuit states that they believe she is doing all of this to make money. presumably continung in the way she is, is also making money? This would again seem to prove the Macrons case.
Her current show was uploaded 7 hours ago and she beiieves they have found the brother living in the US during the 1960's, because Brigitte has said she was in the States during the moon landing which was 1968. She would have been 15 but if she was the brother, he would have been 23. For this reason, there are going to be no shows from this woman for another week, while they go off and investigate their leads for the brother being in the US in the 60's and connected to the MK Ultra programme.
Perhaps it is possible that she was 'onto a story' but in many ways it would be a disservice to humanity that it is someone of the character and personality of this woman that "blows it wide open". Because no matter what the story, the existence of a person such as she is, is a much worse problem in the world. Anyway, another week while she and her hubbie are off 'investigating'.
The only thing we are not sure about is whether the Macrons and their lawyers did provide enough to show Brigitte is a woman, born a woman.
It seems she is still angry that they didn't send the information she demanded of them. But she also demanded they do what she wants or else she will continue to slander them. That is what she is doing now.The proof they sent and the proof she wants, does not make the proof they sent invalid. It is more like she wants the President of France to submit to her will. The podcast where she says this seems to also be quite damning for her, and says 'good luck with proving malice'. In legalese malice means a 'reckless disregard for the truth'. So, enough was sent to prove the truth, but she disregarded it and decided it wasn't proof or the truth.
It still appears she is doing her own legal defense as a person who has grown up with people around her giving her the impression she is 'super intelligent'. Even her husband said this is what he liked about her, and we believe she has bedazzled and bamboozled people, but it is obvious its a bluff she has been able to get away with. She is not super intelligent or especially knowledgeable and those who can see this, know this, and also know that this is something you can bluff. She has not been called out before, not until the Macrons did. It is a fair bet, they are smart enough to see this bluff too. Most likely Owens doesn't know that she is bluffing because people are 'impressed' before she has to provide actual substance. For her, she just hasn't been called out on it. Bet this most likely will be shown and seen very publicly in court.
We have been through many legal and opinion videos and it is clear that this podcaster has stirred up a huge level of hatred, and emotional responses, which could even become dangerous She herself has made it known that it is 'reaching all over the world' - again seems like she doesn't have a lawyer! If it has spread this 'all over the world', the points go to the Macrons. The Macrons were right to take legal action
EPSTEIN HAD MELANIA "A YEAR BEFORE" TRUMP SAYS MICHAEL WOLFF
Michael Wolf was the potential bigprapher for Epstein and was the biographer for Trump, so had many hours of recorded interviews for the necessary material The Engllish author Andrew Lownie had similar recordings as the biographer for Prince Andrew - the other main player in this little operation - and in this video it has Wolff covering some information from Lownie on Melania Trump. We have an interview with Lownie in the next video down. It can probably be safely said that Melania was 'one of the girls' and the night she met Donald Trump at the Kit Kat club, he was the introduction. He wasn't there with another date. This might have been a set up 'model intro' girl for him. After all, Melania says she had recently arrived back from a 'modelling job' and a 'friend' phoned her to invite her to the Kit Kat, so she went.
What these guys had going was what looks like 'model agency' scams, which were really about recruiting girls for "introductions" to wealthy clients, while Epsten had 'massage therapists' for wealthy clents to be 'introduced to'. With the Maxwell connection and the Prince Andrew level of connection, they undoubtedly had a way of getting these :introductions' to elite people. Probably some of these men married these "models" who really were call girls They weren't even 'high class' they were just represented as "models" and they were "introduced" so we can probably guess that some of the "respectable" wives of elite men, were once prostitutes. Looks like the USA's First Lady was too. That is what it looks like.
Same thing happening in Australia, with alleged "models" hooking up considerably with sports people, so sports guys (Football and Cricket) probably picked their 'introductions' from some kind of model catalogue in the same way. Like Lara Bingle an obvious slag, who worked her way through a number of sports people until she hooked that actor in Avatar (Sam Worthington). These girls were never really "models". They are calls 'wags' the 'wives and girlfriends' and in Australia they clearly are a bunch of slags. Now, we know about "model agencies" being fronts for basically prostitution type 'introductions', 'escorts'.
Melania's ''Metropolitan Models' is not a big name agency and the guy who owned it is definitely one of the sus names now being covered. Elite Models was a known agency, considered credible. But what were 'Trump Models'?
Watch Internet Comment.
"Melania lied about her education on her website, till the university of Ljubljana reported she did not graduate, so that part was taken down. she also lied to an attorney, under oath in 2013 that she had graduated with a bachelors degree. so it turns out, she was a university drop-out, and like many beautiful eastern european women, came to the US through a modeling agency (Paolo Zampolli, 'Metropolitan Models') and worked illegally in the US in 1996. she arrived on August 27, 1996, and was paid for 10 modeling assignments between September 10 and October 15, 1996, before she received her work visa Oct 18, 1996. This is according to documents obtained by the Associated Press. she met Trump at the Kit Kat club at a party intended for beautiful eastern European women to meet wealthy men. these are facts."
You see, my London model agency actually evolved from an earlier 'Finishing School' maybe in the 1920's or something and they did used to send actual models over to New York in an arrangement with the Ford Agency which was probably big from the 60's and into the 90's. This was a genuine thing as it provided the US model agency with many new, fresh faces. The videos stress that Ford was protected from this abuse, not at all involved.
The thing is, did these other guys latch onto that idea as way to bring in "models" from eastern Europe but the girls were 'escorts' and 'party girls'. What a neat little scam. Mostly these girls were on board with this and it seems more about prostitution than 'trafficking' if the definition of 'trafficking' is rape - because these girls overall, knowingly and willingly did these 'jobs'. Was prostitution legal in the USA in th 80's 90's? With Trump's own 'model agency' did he get to 'have' (job perks) any or all of them on his books? Was he using the agency for 'modeling' or for party girls, and introductons? Trump and Ivana had close contacts with the former Czechoslovakia, now Czech Republic.
What were the orgies discussed in other videos, that were taking place at Mar-a-Lago? Were they organized parties, was this part of the girls' jobs? Especially as reports are from those attending, many were underage, like 14 and 15.
This Really is a Sickness.
This supply of underage, barely of age, and other women, were girls these men could pick from a catalogue. Prince Andrew, Trump and Epstein were all sick men going after young girls, no older than in their early 20's (mostly). But going after them in this kind of 'category' is a sickness.
People like Epstein, Trump, Prince Andrew are out of control, run from the "sex chakra" and this is a clinical condition, and illness. It's also part of the conversion process.
It is certainly an out of control thing, but it is also a condition that Princess Margaret suffered from. She was Queen Elizabeth's younger sister. We can also go back to the days of Queen Victoria and there is her grandson the Duke of Clarence who was so weirdly sick he was considered to be 'Jack the Ripper'. And there is a son of Victoria's named Alfred who as soon as he had finished an official duty would be off to the nearest whorehouse. It is part of the 'reversed human' which presumably shows itself in different ways, but this is one of them.
This is something that is very much taught particularly through some 'spiritual practices' but also indirectly, and also overtly through Hollywood and pop music. It is intentionally to take people into reversal.
.gif)
What Andrew & Epstein REALLY Did to Girls (At The Same Time): Bombshell Revelations
. Watch Don't know who the guy is giving these revelations. He's not Michael Wolff who had recorded hours of material to write biographies, but he seems to know a few things. But he is an author who has a book on Prince Andrew. Mostly it does look as if the Epstein enterprise covered some forbidden territory and Prince Andrew was caught in that because of his addiction. It's not the royal family, it is him. As for Andrew's girls, this man says women in their 20's but there was Virginia at 17 and thats the only one he is aware of. But there was also Alexandra part Filipina "model" who was about 17 at the time. She's the one who was mistaken for Meghan Markle on a yacht.
It should also be clear that Virginia Roberts Guifre who was ordered from the catalogue and taken to London for Andrew, was already 'on the game' and had been before she ever went to work at Mar a Lago and was recruited to be a masseuse. There are people now trying to say 'trafficked' is rape, so these girls weren't 'trafficked'. This was how they got their work. probably as Melania did when she was introduced to wealthy men to be their companion for a night out. Most of them knew exactly what they were doing, and possibly some young US girls who wanted to be 'models' and some imports from 'east Europe' didn't know. Most of the girls were not the right type for actual modelling work, these agencies were more for recruiting girls.
Its an interesting discussion adding more pieces to the puzzle. There are also some very damning suggestions put out, with shades of Thomas a Becket..
""Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?" is a quote attributed to Henry II of England preceding the death of Thomas a Becket, the Archbishop of Canterbury, in 1170. While the quote was not expressed as an order, it prompted four knights to travel from Normandy to Canterbury, where they killed Becket due to an ongoing dispute between crown and church."
It is said from Michael Wolff that Epstein and Trump went all out to get Prince Andrew to supply girls to, because they wanted the royal contacts and Andrew was the way in. This is covered in one of Wolff's earlier videos in the one about the bet on which one might get to sleep with Princess Diana.
Trump and Epstein had a fatal falling out over a property deal, in which Trump screwed Epstein
and made a $45million profit. Its not clear how Epstein responded, but from Michael Wolff he is saying that Epstein believed that it was Trump who reported what was going on at Epstein's house. This was a very bitter break up between them and it would not be out of character for Trump to do that. However, it was he who screwed Epstein out of the deal. That Trump would do that does seem plausible, and yet also something that could now be damaging to Trump. Possibly there were ways he tried to make amends on this. Perhaps an alive Epstein was removed from the cell in a body bag? Now Maxwell has been transferred to a less strict prison and will probably be set for some kind of freedom, although the new author interview sugests giving her a pardon may be too controversial. Basically, if Trump had not dobbed in Epstein, no-one would know about the Epstein Files, but now Trump wishes that no-one knew about them at all. It was his mistake.
Now Melania has issued these lawsuit threats we do think she was one of the high class working girls who are 'elegant escorts' at a high level.
So the 'job' is, they are introduced to a wealthy guy date, and they can say yes or no to where it goes, but to keep getting jobs they would mostly say yes. They also can choose whether to keep the association going but the initial arrangement is the introduction for the date. The wealthy client pays for that - to whoever provided the introduction. These girls get to think they are high level because of who they go out with. They are still exactly what they are. Sometimes (quite often) they marry one of these guys and then become 'respectable'. This tells you what these girls did to get there! It's a bit unsavoury actually, they are whores or behaved as a whore to get there. Now, because Melania has threatened legal action it does look as if that is what she did.
Meghan Markle's Netflix Season 2 Trailer
We looked at it, just to see. Do others notice what a meesy, ugly looking food stuff she is creatng? Like the Independence Day platter, which looked like some kindergarten effort. This is a valid comment on what looks ot be very messy stuff.
MSM Describes "Zelensky Pushes for Unconditional Meeting with Putin"
CNN shows a happy group with great camaraderie, all goodwill for resolving the Ukraine issue. Democrat side of alt. media thinks Z. 'owns' Trump, and Trump was 'humiliated'. These anti Trump channels are no good for news because it is always this kind of stuff. Z holds no cards at all, and Trump knows the reality with Russia.
Independent media (credible ones) show what looks like a disappointed and powerless group of EU leaders. CNN is representing it like Zelensky is in a powerful position. The EU leaders and Z, arrived in DC in a 'charm offensive'. It looks like Trump told them straight, Russia has won and this has to end. Next Trump phoned Putin to arrange his meeting with Z. then it will be them plus Trump. We again note that Trump is addressing his fellow leaders in a more correct manner (in his social media posts and in person) and this is definitely a change for the better.
American Podcaster STILL Continuing!
We were going to say we felt for her, thinking the penny might have dropped by now. But no! The current episode which we only checked to see how she was going - but the current episode is still doing this. She finds it odd that Morocco and Algeria keep coming up, but as said they have connections with France. We are now just looking to see if she thinks Macron is in DC to again try to get Trump to ask her to stop. He doesn't need to now, he is suing her. Her comment is that he looks stressed, and undoubtedly she thinks its because of her.
The Ukraine issue is probably the only thing he's thinking about, and the Owens thing is a joke he is laughing about. Episode ends with comments and one mentions 'all the world's a stage' quote and does Owens know where that comes from. She doesn't! But we do. It's from Shakespeare, a speech by Jaques in 'As You Like It'. She doesn't know that but claims she read Andre Gide's work when she 'was at university'. (She dropped out of college the first year) but this was an embellishment in an interview. She is now commenting on the holiday trips of Brigitte. Apparently she was in the US during the moon landing. When was that. 1968? Owens doesn't do journalistic investigation, she waits for people to send her information. What +she is doing now is leaving a 'suggestion' that something nefarious was going on during the times Brigitte visited the USA. In fact it is poor old Jean Michel who is supposed to be Brigitte. But there is the general inference that things were going on.
The photos of Brigitte Macron at the school mostly don't look very nice, not attractive at all.
The family likeness though, is similar to the 10 year old boy Jean Michel. But in 1993 JM would have been 48 years old. His birthday is in February The photos are much younger than someone who is 48. .Brigitte would have been 40 years old in April 1993. The rehearsals for the play the drama group was doing began before that, so she was 39 when they met. As a comparison, actress Scarlett Johansson is 40 years old. Brigitte did look similar to her, and there are plenty of 15 year old boys who would like to date Scarlett Johansson.
When this comes to trial, or its finale, we believe the Macron's lawyer will begin with providing the DNA result to the judge and possibly calling Jean Michel Trogneaux as the first witness, or something of that kind. This is almost all they need to do, but certainly to start out with. The DNA result and the presence of the brother. Beyond that they may begin on what they are seeking damages for. Perhaps the amount has already been given to Owen's side.
The two issues Owens was basing just about everything on is Brigitte being a man, and in fact being the brother Jean Michel. The next issue is the ages, which were proveably legal and within French Law. With these things established, there was no 'pedophilia' and obviously no 'incest' as the lawyers will have provided the DNA result from the begining. As there was nothing amiss anywhere then being somehow complicit in murders to try to hide this also has no foundation. As for a network of pedos, there is absolutely nothing to warrant making such an accusation, certainly not connected to the Macrons in their lives.
After that the question is did the Macrons provide enough to show Brigitte was a woman and born a woman? Then they have to establish that what Owens did was continue with a reckless disregard for the truth.
The next things will be all the damage that Owens has done by accusing the Macrons of all these things, and that cannot be denied, because she has done that, and continued with it.
Trump and Epstein: The Cover-up Is WORSE than You Thought
Watch
At the current time there are about 27 accusations against Trump for rape, inappropriate touching, and voyeurism.
This man has put all the Trump-Epstein information together, which is helpful. I have no sound but he looks a bit irritating with his delivery, but I can't hear, only visuals. If it isn't very good we apologize, but its for his work on creating an overall view of the known information.
This man does mention Q Anon, which actually means 'Q' and earlier this year, it was reported that this originated from Israel. Was Trump their man? *The Czech connection with Maxwell, Epstein and bringing in the girls gives a connection to Mossad.
We do want to mention that we believe AI is responsible for a let's call it 'deep agenda'. AI is extremely advanced. One report is that when a programmer was going to delete an AI programme, it tried to blackmail him, to stop him. This planet does have a problem with a very well established anti-god, and it is AI and it does want 'world domination' and to remove humans.
This work does think there were people born, a lineage, or 'families' who were wired in to the AI Their brains are hard wired into the AI and they do not have the abilty for empathy, compassion et cetera.
Adrenochrome is harvested and is a powerful drug. It clearly doesn't keep anyone looking young though. The only way they do that with blood is by freezing it then receiving it intravenously. That does not have the drug effect.
Internet Comments.
"Man, the rich are just weird."
No, they are the weird who became rich through corruption.
"They were not under age women they were children plz call them what they were.... sir."
A... Once a female reaches puberty she becomes a woman, albeit underage by the definition the law says is the 'age of consent'. They are underage, and they are children when at 13 as in the person's testimony. But still a woman, but why was she at the party/orgy Did she agree to go?
There is another recounting of attending an orgy at Mar a Lago and the girls were clearly underage, as told by a star of the music industry we had not heard of, but he was a guest and a witness. In addition, Trump and others held 'beauty pageant' modelling competitions where the girls were clearly young, 14, 15, and it was filmed. It was stated that these were invited back to Mar a Lago for 'parties'.
It is believed if Trump was in the orgies, he would have worn a mask 'Eyes Wide Shut' style. He obviously is that kind of guy to have had those parties. Someone like that is just atrocious.
Melania Trump was certainly a "model" but also not at all underage unless her earlier photos were taken in the USA. She has probably made an error by threatening to sue people, as Hunter Biden has said he will continue. She met Trump in around 1998 at the KitKat Club NYC (covered in our linked pages) a place so sordid it was closed down. Trump and she married when she became pregnant with Barron. She was clearly one of his favourites but not his only attraction during that time. There is a question, was she provided to him?
Trump and Epstein: The Cover-up Is WORSE than You Thought
The 'End Times' - but not the end of the True Reality for those whose 'names' are in the 'Book of Life' -
Zelensky Said to be Sending $50 million a Month to the UAE
Where he will go to after beng replaced. There were reports that he was to be replaced, but also its where he goes if he has to make a quick getaway.
But really we are talking about these people with all this ridiculous amount of wealth. How stupid is it that in world of so many people, there are those with these vast fortunes? Really if you sell to a world audience, via the internet, then $1 from each person would make you a billionaire.
But what we were going to say is that once the planet Ascends to its Polarity Switch, these people will have nothing, no money at all. That is if it goes to the reality change expected. This reality is only experienced via being interpreted by the brain. It exists in the negative-reversed polarity, which is expected to change, creating the 'end of this world'.
But not the end of the True Reality for those whose 'names' are in the 'Book of Life' -
which means you kind of 'registered' with someone who is in that energy stream rather than 'registering' with someone - the many gurus etc - who are in the false/negative energy stream. That seems to be how it works. So long as you did that, then the 'registering' can be passed onward, to 'Higher Up', but it isn't possible to get out of the 'false stream' until you can 'make connections' with the Original Life Stream. It's a different Stream of Energy and Consciousness..
Because really, everything in this world is an illusion, but an illusion that seems real. If you choose to be completely LIKE the 'True Source' same consciousness, then you are choosing the True Energy Stream. This world is not real, and it only exists for about 6,000 years. Thereafter, the planet continues on into the POSITIVE but those 'marked' negative have to exist somewhere and wait until they get the chance to be born again into a human body, and try again to get out of their 'entrapment'.
Trump and Epstein’s Florida Fun
Watch With photos and film.
There is No 'Fake Trump' + Zelensky Meeting.
Trump with Zelensky. “We had a good meeting, as you know, just a short while ago, with the president of Russia. And I think there’s a possibility that something could come out of it.”
On a positive note for Americans, Trump is going to get rid of Mail In ballots and do something about the voting machines. CNN is saying 'false claims' about the mail in's but why say that when it is obvious this is so easy to manipulate? It isn't a 'false claim' it is a valid observation.
Although all world figures do of course have doubles, they are not actual fake versions of themselves doing things like ordering the bombing of Iran and so on. Also the implication that they are rogue versions! The EU leaders and Zelensky all stood for a photo with Trump, as shown on the CNN website. Trump is standing next to Macron who is 5' 8" and it doesn't really look like 'Trump' is 6' 3" but it could be the angle.
As far as Trump is concerned we are now learning about the type of man he actually was in his life. By the way, Russia is a country which has outlawed 'satanism'. It is reported that there were some deals discussed but that was done by the other officials who were there, while everyone focussed on Trump and Putin. Putin is supposed to have approved that Trump can takeover Greenland, but let's face it, Denmark owns Greenland and they haven't approved it!
The alt. news that keep denigrating Putin are full on anti Trump Democrat sites which produce their stuff multiple times a day and never cease Trump bashing. For this reason they are mostly useless news sources because all they are doing is turning everything into the same bashing fest. On occasions they produce something that is actual news. They are good sources for stuff digging into Trump's sordid background though. To name a few of them its Harry Sisson, Adam Mockler, Keith Edwards and Meidas Touch But we do use them sometimes. Stuff that is obviously constantly bashing Trump simply cannot be presenting the actual news!
With the Ukraine situation, Russia is going to win, the Ukraine and all its allies who tried the Orange Revolution - they've been trying this for over a decade - they are not going to make it. It is flogging a dead horse.. However, it might delay things until 'they' start on Iran again. Trump's involvement in that means he is working for the wrong team. However, since there were many other top level people meeting in Alaska, they may have done some deals.
The team of Euro leaders did get a decent welcome on arrival in DC. This could be for 'other' info to be passed to these leaders following the Alaska meeting. Maybe some 'other' deals involve their interests? I mean, like, its unusual that they are all rolling up like this just because Zelensky has a meeting! Maybe they're fired because they know the news isn't what they want. This is a strange meeting and everyone is full of smiles.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky presented US President Donald Trump a letter from the Ukrainian first lady to Melania Trump.
According to Mercouris and the Duran, reliable political commentators, Zelensky & Co. aim to prevent Trump-Putin deal
Eight pages of internal Trump administration documents left in Alaskan Hotel
Big news clickbait for youtube businesses, but not clear that this stuff is significant, given that the papers were 'covering everything from the luncheon menu to seating arrangements and a bald eagle desk statue gift—were accidentally left in a hotel printer in Anchorage ahead of the Alaska summit. He also points out that Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt appeared visibly frightened and “ashen” after meeting with Putin, as reported by the press.'
As for the welcome for Putin and red carpet, Americans should get over it. Trump is trying to end the war in Ukraine, use some common sense. Maybe Trump was even lucky that Putin agreed to meet him. The comments are disrespectful to the leader of the country who can make that war come to an end. How dumb can that be.
Trump did okay with that meeting. Russia is not going to agree to any terms other than Ukraine surrendering. The USA has no winning hand here at all.
MSM is providing fake news on the Ukraine situation. We are checking with the genuine independent sources such as Alexander Mercouris
He is reporting from frontline sources that Russia is on top and Ukraine soldiers are dying in droves. No-one wants to see this loss of life. Ukraine is finished and that is correct reporting from multiple credible independent sources. For this reason the USA was LUCKY Putin agreed to meet with Trump,. Undoubtedly Putin made the position clear and Trump does understand this situation.
Internet Comments
"The view of US Soldiers rolling out a red carpet for Putin was despicable and really pathetic. What the HELL is happening to America??"
Actually that can be answered easily. It is people making comments like this one above, that is taking the US to its grave.
Macron REJECTS Trump Alaska Terms . . .
News source : "France President Emmanuel Macron rejected Russia's peace proposals for Ukraine as a "surrender," speaking at a video conference of the so-called "coalition of the willing." He plans to confront Trump at White House Monday.
He flatly refuses to acknowledge that the Ukraine Army is within 60-90 days of collapse. Sooner if the U.S pulls-out. Macron wants to see the deployment of Western troops within Ukraine. This is an absolute non-starter. The Russians have made it explicitly clear that any foreign troops that enter Ukraine, will be legitimate targets for the Russian Army" No matter what role they say they are there for, the Russians will kill them..
Trump tells Zelensky to give up Crimea and agree to never join NATO
Zelensky will be joined by 'multiple European leaders' when he meets with the US President.who has previewed the message he’ll deliver: Zelensky. His response was “I am confident that we will defend Ukraine, effectively guarantee security, and that our people will always be grateful to President Trump, everyone in America, and every partner and ally for their support and invaluable assistance. Russia must end this war, which it itself started.”
Russia is not going to end the war. It will continue until every Ukraine soldier has been killed, and any foreign troops deployed there are also killed. This report comes from CNN, which covers this as if Trump has invited the EU leaders for their input on this.
European Leaders Told They Will Wait in the Hall While Trump Speaks to Zelensky
From News source Hal. "The American president flatly rejected the idea of a joint session with European leaders, insisting instead on a solo meeting with Volodymyr Zelensky before anyone else enters the room.
The optics are brutal: Europe’s “leaders” fly across the Atlantic only to sit like schoolchildren outside the Oval Office, waiting for permission to enter. This is not partnership — it is humiliation dressed up as diplomacy. This is not diplomacy; it is subjugation on full display.. (It also seems they were just being a bit sacastic after the Iran failure, but trump can still put them in their place.) CNN has photos of all 6 'leaders' as the lead headline, and really this looks juvenile that they are or were all travelling there to 'hold Zelensky's hand'. 6 Prime Ministers can all just take time out to do this!"
Further down :- Europe is sending some of its "leaders" to be with Zelensky for the White House meeting tomorrow. His bet is they want to make sure the war goes on. Trump should sit them ALL down and tell ALL of them, what he wrote, above.
European leaders to join Zelensky in Washington: : European Commission President von der Leyen. : President of Finland Stubb.
President of France Macron. : German Chancellor Merz.: NATO Secretary General Rutte. : Italian Prime Minister Meloni.
America and Israel Will Strike Iran Very Soon!
The ceasefire was because both sides need to restock on missiles. Israel more so than Iran, but Iran needed to up its air defenses. Taking out Iran is an 'evil agenda'. This is why we had videos on current day iran which also showed us normal people living their lives in a modern city. Men and women wearing western sytle fashion, and most women with their hair free. Iran has been able to ptoduce a nuclear weapon for over 20 years. However, the levels they are enriching uranium to are kind of like a red flag to a bull. Even perhaps darin israel to attack - which it did and was slaughtered. serious questions for anyone to ask themseves why is the US supporting Israel do this? Iran is not going for a nuclear weapon. It has all it eeds with its huge, massive arsenal of hypersonic and other missiles.
That said, the date for this war to resume is September with October being the latest.
LEMON DROP | BOMBSHELL! Michael Wolff on Melania Trump, Hunter Biden, & Jeffrey Epstein
Watch Maybe Melania should not have threatened to sue Hunter Biden. "Don sits down with bestselling author and journalist Michael Wolff to dig into the inside story of Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. How did Trump and Melania really meet, and was Epstein part of the picture? They also break down the latest twist: reports that Trump may sue Hunter Biden for repeating this explosive reporting. From the backstory to the legal threats, Wolff brings the receipts and the context."
Melania Trump Suing to STOP the Story?!
Trump wants the Epstein story to go away. So does Melania Trump who has probably highlighted this and done more damage by threatening a lawsuit to several people. She is using Trump's lawyers and sending 'cease and desist' letters. One person threatened is Hunter Biden who plans to go ahead with it. In fact people are contributing to help cover legal fees should this go to a lawsuit. There is no way that Melania did not have a connection with Epstein. She's in photos with him. Really should not have drawn attention to this by threatening a lawsuit. No-one particularly cares about what she did. She was obviously a nude photo type "model" and married a rich man.
This is an example of someone, Melania Trump, who is trying to stop the story.
Obviously there is a story here. Melania being from a very average background probably has had all the wealth go to her head, and she is using her 'wealth position' to threaten.
"It is time". Says Melania Trump in her letter hand delivered to Putin. OMG!
Absolutely beyond belief. What is this moron doing! Has to be Trump's initiative we suppose, but OMG how little they understand reality. Putin and the Russians will be laughing about this, are already doing so. So glad I am not American. This is embarrassing.
Adam Mockler with MeidasTouch Network
"exposes a shockingly naive letter from First Lady Melania Trump to Vladimir Putin, hand-delivered by Donald Trump
during their disastrous Alaska meeting. In the letter, Melania bizarrely praises the indicted war criminal's ability to protect the "innocence of these children," despite Putin facing arrest for abducting over 35,000 Ukrainian children. Mockler slams this pathetic attempt at diplomacy as proof that the entire Trump administration is dangerously out of touch with the reality of who Putin is." *** We may add the video link. 'Who Putin is'? He's a very strong leader of Russia and this letter is very very naive. Especially if it comes from Trump, because he desparately needs that ceasefire in Ukraine! Just checking this video first.
Okay. Commenting on the video, the person presenting it thinks it is disgusting how Putin was welcomed to Alaska. Stupid comment, to start with. There was clearly some understanding about respect before this meeting was even agreed to. It is not disgusting that the President of Russia was greeted as the leader of a foreign country should be greeted. The main and very significant point of interest is that this letter was given to Putin! It demonstrates how desparately Trump needs the ceasefire. There will probably be a copy of the letter available somewhere, and we'll add it if we find it. With the signature shown on this letter, there are questions that this is a real thing or 'fake news'.
The letter ends with 'It is time', then Sincerely. This is not a correct way to end a letter such as this purports to be. We don't know if this letter was given to Putin. Reflects very badly if it was. Updated. An embarrassment on the world stage. The letter was for real. *Doing something like this, might completely end Trump's venture into 'world leadership'.
Melania DARK PAST Surfaces as Putin Letter GETS LEAKED
Watch plus more nudie photos of Melania which the Russians do have. This was just uploaded 30 mins ago. This man presenting this is saying Putin is sex trafficking children. Given all the information we have been given for several years, we will leave these accusations as being 'Democrats with TDS'. Because both news sources used here are that, and their job is to attack Trump. Putting that aside, they do have this letter. Putin is not sex trafficking children. The way into a world where the NWO is defeated is with the BRCS countries, so there will be slanderous remarks for the resson that the Trump haters and the Democrats are not part of the change. trump may do some good things but he is on the side f the NWO - lets watch for what he does with Iran possibly in September.
Covid Jabs were Dangerous
Most are aware of the turbo cancers and we want to comment that not only does Catherine, Princess of Wales have cancer, but Queen Elizabeth died with bone cancer, and Charles also has cancer. They were caught in this too.
Piers Morgan Says “You’ve Been DUPED!” To Candace Owens’ Face!
*We are just following this now to see when Owens realises the interpretation that Macrons already know Brigitte is a woman.
Current video is a review from the earlier interview with Piers Morgan. Or it maybe a follow on new interview. Its earlier. Now checked. From what she is wearing it's an interview from about a week ago given that this is Sunday Aug. 17th. This matters because after this has been pointed out to her, her recent videos are still on the same attack. This is probably because she has missed the initial point Piers presented, and also because she doesn't research. She just relies on people sending her information. Her recent video has written on it "Either they destroy me, or I destroy it". So she still has not considered that they are suing her for real.
Candace thinks she's on to a story about an 'elite pedo network' that has been able to 'be above the law' and she is going to blow it wide open. This is why she believes she deserves the Pultitzer Prize. And because she is "on to this story"' of the "biggest cover up of all time", believes she's on her way to beig the biggest name in journalism on the planet.
So two points from the initial bit I have seen of this 6 minute video.
Owens answers Piers by saying an incorrect reporting that "Macron got on a plane to visit Trump to beg him to stop her reporting". This is a huge misrepresentation but maybe she has made this a real thing in her head. Macron had an official visit to DC earlier to discuss issues they need to discuss. He didn't get on a plane to beg Trump to ask this person to stop reporting. However, Owens does have a hugely unrealistic view of her own importance. Macron did ask Trump to do something about it as an addition to what he was there for. Probably having had the US President ignored by Owens also helps the Macron's case. Owens misses important details.
Secondly Piers is pointing out in the first sentences, that all the Macrons need to do is the DNA test. Piers clearly says that that is the reason they are coming after Owens, because they know they can prove she is wrong. Owens misunderstands this and answers 'it sounds like you're on our side'. Owens has misunderstood that the Macrons are doing this because they KNOW they can prove this. Owens should have realized this before continuing. Now they really can sue her. She is also trying to promote her Brigitte series via this interview. No-one needs to see the series because it makes no difference. It is issues such as the Macrons HAVE sued her for, and because, as we have always said, they do KNOW Brigitte is 'most likely' a woman. Piers is right, Owens was duped, and he presents sensible observations.
I would suggest that Xavier Proussard is making a killing with his book because of Candace Owens doing what she is doing, and it is only Owens who can be sued. There is also a possibility, allegedly, that the two women, (who were not journalists as Owens said they were) and the book author Proussard, there is a possibility that maybe these 3 people already knew each other?
Watch, 6 mins. Uploaded 11 hours ago.
Trump and Zelensky Meeting on Monday.
The NEWS source on this says his opinion is that the conversation will go something like this.
""The war with Russia is over. Ukraine has lost.
At present, you have lost 1.2 Million men. You are losing 1,000-2,000 more men per day. The Russians have lost far less. Ukraine is fielding 5 Battalions a month in new troops. But Ukraine is losing 8 - 10 Battalions per month through injuries, deaths, and desertions. Ukraine simply cannot sustain this level of attrition. Russia is fielding three times as many Battalions - 15 per month - and not losing nearly as many men as Ukraine.
The United States has provided so much weaponry to Ukraine, that our own stocks are running dangerously low. At our presently available rate of production, it will take SEVEN YEARS for the United States to re-supply ourselves, and that's NOT with continued supplies to Ukraine, or to Europe! It isn't even just a matter of not sending more of our own supplies; we simply do not have the ability to PRODUCE more weapons, faster. We will not endanger our own defense, to continue providing weaponry to Ukraine. We will simply NOT do that.
Europe is completely unable to make-up for the supply of weapons the US provides. So when the US stops, and we are stopping, the Ukraine Army will have maybe two months worth of weaponry before it runs out completely and collapses. By three months from now, it will be over, and there's nothing any of us can do to prevent this.Even if the US and all of Europe impose the harshest economic sanctions possible, Russia can still ride-them-out and win decisively on the battlefield. Even if Europe outright STEALS Russia's sovereign wealth funds, there is simply no place that can supply the weapons such money would buy. They don't have the weaponry in stock and they cannot build it fast enough.
Russia has won. They hold all the cards on the battlefield. The whole world would see that if this war goes on. Such a visible defeat scenario is not what the US or Europe want the world to see. So today, I am telling you that you and your legislature, the Verkhovna Rada, will accept ALL of Russia's terms to end this war and re-establish peace. EVERY SINGLE TERM the Russians insist upon, Ukraine must accept.
These are Russia's Terms:
-
- Putin’s proposal for ending the war in Ukraine:
- No ceasefire until a comprehensive agreement is reached.
- Ukraine to fully withdraw troops from Donetsk and Luhansk.
- Russia to freeze front lines in Kherson and Zaporizhia.
- Ukraine to regain control of areas in Sumy and Kharkiv.
- Ukraine to formally recognize Russian sovereignty over Crimea.
- Partial lifting of sanctions against Russia.
- Ukraine barred from joining NATO.
- Putin open to Ukraine receiving specific security guarantees.
- Official status for Russian language in Ukraine.
- Freedom for the Russian Orthodox Church to operate in Ukraine.
There is no other alternative. If you refuse even ONE of their terms, the war will go on, and in three months, they will win it all anyway.
I realize you may not want to accept this situation, but that's up to you. If you do what I tell you, the US will continue financial support to help rebuild Ukraine. If you refuse to do what I tell you, then everything I have said will happen anyway, but the US will walk away, and Ukraine will get nothing.
So it is in your long term interest to do exactly what I have just told you, because in the end - two, maybe three months from now-- this war will end with Ukraine's decisive defeat. There is nothing any of us can do to stop it." (Hal Turner)
Hal has just been updated.
Europe is sending some of its "leaders" to be with Zelensky for the White House meeting tomorrow. His bet is they want to make sure the war goes on. Trump should sit them ALL down and tell ALL of them, what he wrote, above.
European leaders to join Zelensky in Washington: : European Commission President von der Leyen. : President of Finland Stubb.
President of France Macron. : German Chancellor Merz.: NATO Secretary General Rutte. : Italian Prime Minister Meloni.
Earlier News.
Fox Hosts Realize ON AIR that PUTIN OWNED TRUMP
Watch 12 mins *We don't think it was a business deal. We think Putin has leverage over Trump and/or it is based on the almost complete success Russia now has over Ukraine. . In all ways he's in a difficult place.
Putin Leaves Alaska Meeting Early
As we have noted, for some time, Russia has been putting Trump in his place for how rude he has been and his 'king of the planet' attitude. With this Alaska meeting you can clearly see that this was a very 'equal in power' welcome for Putin. In fact, maybe that is what this meeting was arranged for. The optics. We are not worried what may have led to this, Trump should acknowledge Russia and Putin as an equal. Before, Trump was talking down to him and ordering Putin around. but there is something, and it might be kompromat to do with Epstein. Also it was noted that Putin spoke first at their presser. Usually it is the President of the country who speaks first. As we have said, Trump maybe leaving the stage, and it it stems from the Iran issue - either that he identified himself as working for the 'world domination' agenda, or. But in fact, we will keep it at that. Putin and Russia are definitely holding some cards here.
In the Mercouris analysis he does qualify that he assumes Trump knows the war in Ukraine is decimating Ukrainians and that Russia is in control. But there were elements of doubt because of what is being reported in the msm (mainstream media).This meeting only lasted around 3 hours and Putin left before a scheduled 'working lunch'. It suggests Trump's advisers are telling him the same as the msm figures. We will add more, but the next two news items are Col. MacGregor's analysis and political commentator Mercouris.
When Putin arrived the reporting was :"Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin has arrived in Alaska for a high-stakes, very serious Summit with the President of the United States, Donald Trump.
This is the single most important Diplomatic meeting and effort since World War 2. Many, MANY, lives around the world, are riding on what these two men discuss and decide at this meeting.
It is not clear why msm is misreporting. Trump suggested the Russians did not go into Kiev because the tanks were stuck in the mud. CNN says "Russia tried and failed to make it to Kyiv using roads and highways. Its tanks were thwarted by fierce Ukrainian resistance and logistical problems in addition to muddy conditions."
When CNN asked the White House for comment, an official responding on condition of anonymity noted Thursday that Russian tanks did get stuck in mud during and even before the invasion. The question is, why msm is not reporting the actual situation in Ukraine. Is it to keep the public on side with the EU agenda to continue the war? Who does CNN work for?
Col. Macgregor Gets Angry: "STOP LYING TO YOUR AUDIENCE"
Watch 10 mins. Ukraine is falling apart. The Russians hold all the aces. Trump holds a dead hand. Putin and Trump about to talk in the former Russian territory of Alaska.
Kiev's Pokrovsk Counterattacks Fail; Huge Oreshnik Strike Damage Confirmed; Putin Trump Go To Alaska
Lavrov arrives in Alaska wearing USSR T shirt (written in Russian as CCCP) The make up of the Russian side appears to indicate this will also be a discussion about trade - although the reporter for this is now saying that that may not overly be the case. Seems likely it would be though. The Russians will want the territory they want which definitely means Crimea. With the current battle areas a good source attached to the Russian frontline military has told this report source (Mercouris) that the Ukraine losses in Pokrovsk are horrendous but for the Russians, very light which is the same information as Col. MacGregor gives. The Oreshnik attack on the missile factory reported earlier was successful but also that particular missile manufacturing programme had been spread out but the Russians located them all and they are now all destroyed. Putin is clearly making a point that Ukraine is finished. Trump arrived in Alaska saying plenty of nice things about Putin.
Continues to the topic on how Candace Owens uses Mind Control.
This new section below is also on the page More Mind Contrrol
This will still be news until the trial or any settlement is over, then we certainly have no further interest in this person.
To date Owens appears unaware of the reality of the lawsuit, and it also seems that her husband is unaware too. She damaged or possibly lost this, even in her first podcast after learning of the lawsuit. Then she still continued. Defamation is difficult to prove especially against a public figure, but accusations of incest, pedophilia, grooming, identity theft, and complicit in murder might just do it!
it should be pointed out that other journalists are just as 'fearless' about going after a topic, but they are more careful from the legal standpoint. They cover themselves against being sued. *We are covering this from the lawsuit angle.
It looks like she has thought she is/was 'pioneering' where others were holding back. But it wasn't from 'fear', but because they were aware of the legal ramifications, and its very clear that Candace was not aware. She has said in a recent interview 'she didn't know she could be sued".
This is another aspect of Candace Owens and of how little she seems to really know. She also makes every private communication from lawyers fully known in her podcasts, and the phone call from Trump advising her to stop. It was all made public, in the same way Harry and his wife made private things public, but they did it for publicity. It seems Candace gives the impression she thinks she can do everything without proper training. People have fallen before her, bedazzled, which may explain her initial response to the lawsuit, and being challenged, as "how dare you".
So in the next sections we look at some of the responses she has basically cultivated by the manner in which she presented her information. She has consistenly misrepresented the ages, which is the only way some of her many accusations 'work'. The comments beneath videos then demonstrate an emotional reaction from people who have taken her words as being facts. Emotional responses then suggest there is some kind of cover up or people have 'missed seeing' usually the age difference. This produces more subscribers and an ongoing debate. But the ages are not the ones she continues to say.
The lawsuit was issued at the end of July and the reason most are following this in amazement is that she did not seem to have a lawyer and she continued with her very ugly rants in her podcasts and interviews. She is 'supposed' to be 'intelligent' and 'knowledgeable'. Instead, in her life, she has learned to bamboozle people. She fakes it, and people have responded positively. Now she has been called out.
Some people wonder why she bothered whether Brigitte Macron was born a man.. The answer is it was her career making story for 'fame and fortune', and that is proved by the analytics on what her channel is now producing. That is the reason for it. That does fit her MO. It is also stated in the lawsuit.
The lawyers for the Macrons would have been watching how she presents her podcasts. She is predicatable...
It does seem that Owens and probably her husband too, if he is her show's producer as someone pointed out,
interpreted that the Macrons suing Owens, did so to 'stop pursuing her investigation'.
As if they were worried and this was some kind of panic move because she was 'getting close'.
That may be why they didn't seem to immediately get a lawyer. Even at the current time, she does not seem to have a lawyer explaining the situation because to date - currently Aug. 16th - she has been pursing the same behaviour.
The situation is that the Macrons have sued her for Defamation. It isn't to just stop her discussing things on her show. It is to stop the Defamation.. She has actually had 3 letters of warnings for her to 'cease and desist'.
It is extraordinary and amazing that she does not seem to recognize the defamatory nature of her "expose". In the series /documentary she did on Mrs Macron and in all her related podcasts, she never covers herself by saying 'in my opinion' or 'allegedly'. She states everything as fact, while also leaving out evidence to the contrary that she was given, and misrepresenting 'facts'. It is extraordinarily unprofessional. But again we say it looks like she has bluffed her way through everything throughout her life, and for the first time ever, someone has called her out.
Currently the Macrons can gain enormous support from all the gays and drag queens and deviants because of this story!
Today's video. It's Saturday but in the US it would have been Friday. Owens is still as nasty in her delivery of her podcast but it did clarify some details. The lawsuit was issued on July 23rd. And Owens has just found out that Brigitte's sister and a niece died earlier in July. We already knew that. Owens is commenting that Jean Michel did not seem to be at his sister's funeral. However, Jean Michel is 80 but also we think, they may be saving his appearance for later. The comments aren't damning, but she is still accusing Brigitte of being JM. She's saying if they were both at that funeral then maybe they wouldn't need the lawsuit. But we think they want the lawsuit and trial, and they do want the damages they can get.
Owens is also suggesting that in the family photo, it is the niece sitting on the Trogneux family's mother's knee. Well researched as always! However, the birth records do have 6 children and the photo is in around 1955 when JM was 10 and Brigitte would have been 2 years old. The niece was 68 when she passed away in early July. That is 4 years younger than Brigitte, so born around 1957. That would have made her non existent at the time of the photo. That is, she wasn't born.
Next she is accusing Emmanuel of being homosexual. Others have been doing that for a long time. He met someone who became his 'mentor' back in 2002. To be honest, it is certain Macron was ambitious and he has formed his own political party which proves it. When you are trying to make it in politics you do have mentors and supporters, and it means they finance you as donors, and/or help you along the way with networking. He needs to have contacts that he has been introduced to and vouched for. In return you have to do a few things which may include supporting gay groups and drag queens, who knows, but it is the support that gets you to become President.
Owens is also making an issue of Morocco but probably doesn't know that Algeria and Morocco have very close ties with France. "The French protectorate in Morocco, also known as French Morocco, was the period of French colonial rule in Morocco that lasted from 1912 to 1956." The language in Morocco is French, also spoken in Algeria. Another one of Macrons donors was the business associate of fashion designer Yves St Laurent. This guy was a pervert, and went to Morocco for those reasons. He did, but not with Macron. However, Morocco was French. It is very normal for French people to go there. Owens is inferring that Macron went to Morocco for 'pedergast' reasons. So this might be another slanderous slurr in the legal sense Basically, I just wanted to check if she was still continuing to accuse the Macrons. She might be going for the "I really believe it" defense.
Macron and his benefactor went to Morocco in 2006 and he was introduced to the French Socialist Party, and former President Francois Hollande (who had several mistresses as his 'first lady' while he was President.) Being introduced to high level contacts is exactly what a person trying to move upwards needs to do. Macron had political aspirations and this is normal. Normal to have benefactors and mentors, and donors. What Owens is doing though is calling this man a 'Sugar Daddy' and that is another accusation which means something very different from a political network contact. This also may add to the mix as a defamation and she is suggesting that Macron was taken there for sexual reasons. However, it is clear that he was introduced to important political contacts in the former French protectorate of Morocco. The issue is she is again inferring something else by labelling this man 'Sugar Daddy'. That may be a problem for her when in court.
The usual meaning for 'Sugar Daddy' is "A wealthy, usually older man who gives money or gifts to a younger person in return for sexual favors or companionship." And it is surmised that this is what Owens is inferring.
The only other thing is that she is now advertising some affliliate link products. Obviously to raise revenue to pay her legal costs.Still selling her Macron merch though.
The fact that she is continuing could be a defense to show "she really believes it". But the fact that she has been given enough evidence to show otherwise does not make that a defense. The existence of the brother who is supposed to be Brigitte is now a point of evidence.
He was at BOTH the inauguration ceremonies which means the photo was not of the older brother who died in 2018, meaning he could have been in the photo from 2017, but would have been 84. The brother at the 2017 inauguration didn't look 84. But there probably would have been both brothers there, and there is only one.
There is also the photo of Brigitte and Jean Michel together and when a French journalist did his investigation, he confirmed this was Jean Michel, plus of course he went to JM's house and met him. We think the Macrons are not making a thing of this yet because it will be introduced in court. It is up to Owens to do her research, and she doesn't. She just waits for people to send her information. It is believed the Macrons did send enough to prove Brigitte exists. Also a legal statement that she is who she says she is is the same as saing somehting under oath, so it is also enough proof. The lawsuit itself states these things, and it is an official legal document.
Owens is still insulting this poor man by describing him as the 'fat, little chubby guy'. She has insulted the looks of everyone in the family!
The comments benath her own video are people from 'all over the world' - apparently - saying they support her. These comments are from another black guy's video and they offer some different views on this.
Internet Comments.
"Nah, Candace. It’s not “an attack on our speech.” It’s an attack on YOUR defamatory speech."
"This is an example of, when thinking you’re the smartest kid in the class, goes WRONG!!!"
"Why does she think OUR First Amendment applies to France? In the case of a defamation, it doesn't even apply in America."
"Treat people the way you want to be treated!!"
"Good for Macron."
"The difference that Candace didn’t know opinion and facts. Even me here in Africa knows that from Tucker Carlson case when the judge said it was his opinion not facts. Now Candice never said opinion she said facts. Now she has to pay."
"We have an epidemic of people that think they're smarter than they actually are. She needs to stop digging."
"YOU NEED TO BE BROKEN Candace!!!! WE LOVE YOU BRIGITTE!!"
"I think its funny that she thinks so highly of herself, that she believes the Pres or VP should even consider her and her problems and would act on her behalf "
"But why she choose the first lady of one of the most powerful countries in the world to play with? What is behind this? I don't understand."
"Don’t mess with Frenchmen in love. That man loves his wife."
Section above is More Mind Contrrol
Next Section is : Candace Owens and Mind Control
Very Possible There Will Be Stricter Restrictions for the Internet.
All of this, the entirety of it, is about Owens, she is the issue, (and her ignorance). It is not about the Macrons other than they called her out.
There is also a considerable issue to do with 'comments' such as added next.
These people have most likely only listened to Owens' version, they have not done their own research, or they are brain dead and a danger to society.
“Unconventional relationship?????” Disgusting."
(They will be shaking their fists about this soon.)
"VULGAR !!!!"
"Sickening."
There are endless numbers of these self-righteous comments - which are comments that can only be based on what Candace Owens has presented. Which means misrepresented. People who also do not check the facts, because perhaps they want to say this. This is a quick recap although we already have many pages covering this issue.
Emmanuel Macron was born in 1977. The school provides the date of the play they did and it was May 1993. He was 15. That is when they MET. . Nothing else. Firstly he was of legal age when they met. He was not underage. Secondly, this is the only person she knew like this, and it began as a friendship, but the important thing is they are married and have been for nearly 20 years.
There is no other such connection with anyone else, they remained loyal to each other even though he was sent away to a boarding school in Paris. After he returned and was 29 years old, they married. They are still married.
How is this even remotely a 'pedo' issue that she should be 'jailed' for? (As said in 'comments')
Brigitte was never his teacher in a class. She was the drama coach for an out of school hours theatre group. In addition their connection was looked into by the families and the school when he was 16, nearly 17, and they found nothing wrong or illegal.
It is the LAW that 15 is NOT underage. That is the LAW.
Comments continue with people, apparently Americans suggesting that the French do not follow a proper legal system about the issue of age.
Some of the comments are bordering on Americans slandering the French.
The issue of the ages was looked into by the school and the parents and there was nothing illegal. These people went through all of this 30 years ago, and have since moved on in their lives.
It should clearly be stated that it is an opinion that it is a FACT that France is a much more developed, and civilized country that the USA. The slandering of the French by Americans is another worrying issue, and also that it has been triggered by Owens' misrepresenting the facts of this narrative.
UPDATE.
We are now awaiting the trial. Most likely the Macrons will want a large sum in damages so probably not going to settle.
This story is reaching many in the USA mainly, and there is noticable anger about anyone presenting a video who does not agree with Owens.
This again shows how much damage has been done by Owens' influence over others', opinions and their emotions.
We're not going too much into this one. We hope these comments will fade, but many people are fired by this influencer Owens. People who keep making these comments are going to completely finish Owens. This is a huge range of influence (and actually a form of mind control) she has had over these people, and this is very, very damaging. maybe the lawyers will go for more than her husband's wealth. Fact is, Owens did not present the facts. She presented mistruths which benitted her business model - which is also what she is being sued for.
Internet Comments (just 2)
1."I've found LegalEagle's take on it all also quite interesting. Candace doesn't seem to know, that she's probably heading for more costs than she might expect."
2. "I watched the LegalEagle thing on this and while I generally really like him, I felt he was a little dishonest about the evidence. He literally said something like “in what should have been the coup de gras of the conspiracy theory, the legal complaint restates that Brigitte birthed 3 children.” And it’s like…(legalEagle's take is ) look… I believe Brigitte Macron was born a woman because I think a cover up like this would just be too hard to pull off and I don’t think Candace’s evidence amounts to more than a series of coincidences."
HOWEVER, there is not a single photo of Brigitte Macron pregnant, in hospital, or RAISING her three children. Not ONE. So to act like a legal complaint stating that Brigitte Macron gave birth to three children proves that Candace is lying, is just silly!
We have (they have presented) a total of FOUR photos of Brigitte Macron prior to the age of like 36 and none of them are clear enough to obviously be Brigitte Macron. And so while I like LegalEagle’s broader legal analysis, I am just finding myself consistently annoyed that he and everyone else is glossing over the kind of notable lack of good evidence by the Macrons.
But it’s such a weird take for me to have because it’s not that I believe the conspiracy, but it’s also not that I agree with all the people out there rolling their eyes at it (which I felt was legaleagle’s posture)."
Response :
Owens and 'Mind Control"
LegalEagle is covering the legal aspects of this lawsuit. He is diplomatically pointing out that a cover up as suggested would be too hard to pull off. It would also be cleared by legal teams before there was even a trial. The 'conspiracy' aspect works for Owens though.
Owens is a master at influencing how people will think. She is a 'mind controller'.
That is exactly what she does. This is what she has been called out on. Example : Mentioning that Trump should step into this to 'defend American free speech' was an attempt to influence a desired behaviour/response. It is planting the seed of an idea, as if it is the person's own thought. (If you need more of an explanation on that, she is trying to get her fans to call for Trump to intervene for her.)
The consistent misrepresentation of the age difference and actual ages is enough to prove Owens' is guilty of defamation. Even if Brigitte was born a man, Owens has misrepresented the ages and that alone sets off a nightmare trail of additional accusations. Only from that misrepresentation can Owens go off into the pedo aspect, because 15 and 39 is not and was not, underage in France.
Owens misrepresented the age difference again in the very first podcast she did after learning she was being sued.
Part of the reasons you don't have the photos is because Owens chose not to show them. The fact that she didn't show the evidence that was provided is the bigger issue. Although we don't have access to knowledge of what all the evidence that was provided was. Even so Owens is a very lazy 'investigator' she just asks people to send her (a nobody) the evidence. She is the one who is supposed to search for the evidence. Nobody owes her anything.
In fact she is saying, 'if you don't do what I want, I am going to continue to slander you.'
As we have said, we think the strategy might have been to see how far Owens would hang herself, and also take note of all the comments - like this one - that are triggered because of it, to show how much damage Owens has done. So many people think a lack of photos proves Owens is right and the Macrons are 'hiding something' because of that. That gives Owens a bigger support base.
Candace Owens bluffs her way into whatever 'career move' she has done. She has been called out by people who are much smarter than she is.
Her 'intelligence' is a bluff and she has been called out by people who are much smarter than she is. She was also shocked that she has been called out and this has probably not been done before. Perhaps because she has gotten away with her bluff of 'super intelligence' (or whatever) for her entire life, she believes it. Her continuing videos are exposing the truth about 'Candace Owens'.
It is Candace Owens who is being 'exposed' by this lawsuit. She would have done better to keep her mouth shut.
Comments under videos are now mellowing as people realise they can see she is not exctly what she appeared to be.
Candace Owens is married to George Farmer the son of a British aristocrat with a personal wealth around $240 million. He proposed to her after 17 days, they had not dated but he was 'impressed with her intelligence'. They actually then dated for 8 months before they married in August 2019 and have since had 4 children together. George is beginning to come across as something of a Prince Harry level of awareness. His father has already made a public statement that he does not agree with his daughter in law for what she said about Israel. We need to find the wording for that but it would seem to be a division once again caused by the personality of a misled son's 'difficult' wife.
Owens was aware she was being sued over three weeks ago. She has said that last weekend 'a legal team' quoted their costs for the lawsuit would be about $5 million. The actual costs she is likely to have to come up with will be more than double that to cover the Macron's costs and it is open house for how much they can sue her for damages. Possibly covering her husbands wealth. Possibly much more, we don't know, but it would seem to be a significant amount they can go for in damages.
Big Hype Meeting Between Putin and 'What His Name' Trump
Putin holds the cards here,
Russia Hits Joint Ukraine-Germany Long-Range-Missile Factory; "Colossal Damage"
Wow. Just before the meeting with Trump. This is some message!
The FSB said that Ukraine, with NATO’s permission, had planned to use Sapsan long-range missiles for strikes deep into Russian territory. “Thanks to the joint efforts of the FSB and Russian Armed Forces, Ukraine’s missile program plans have been thwarted,” the statement added.
The German Defense Ministry had stated that investing in Ukraine’s production would enable Kiev to have a “substantial” number of long-range weapons this year.The Sapsan was clearly what they were referring to. Those plans have just been smashed by Russia.
*The most recent Owens material is now on one page. To date, she still doesn't seems to understand the lawsuit situation..
Brigitte has also filed a separate lawsuit for cyber harassment, and 10 people are to stand trial in October.
"Careful who you marry fellas, look at what is about to happen to George Farmer and look at what happened to Prince Harry."
"I hope her husband had her sign a pre-nup. She doesn't have money, he does. His family has "old money." Guess why she married him 17 days after meeting him .".
"I really wonder what her husband thinks of all of this. They got married after knowing each other for 2 weeks and immediately had 4 kids. All in a relationship that’s 5 years old. I’m younger than her and been married 8 years and I still feel like I don’t know everything about my husband. This is something that could tear apart such a new relationship.".
A.... George did propose after 17 days, but then they dated for 8 months then married.
"She WAS demonetized she said when she was monetized again. If you look at her analytics, it shows when she was demonetized and then given back around April or so of last year..... She makes 900k a month from YouTube alone. Take a look at her analytics on YouTube."
A. And she does so by using the 'batshit controversial' method to hook fans.
"Legal Eagle did a breakdown of this the other day. She’s basically doing everything wrong in response to a defamation suit."
A. We have that video on this page but also on one of the links to videos on this topic. 'Candace Owens Defames The Macrons? Watch'
"Candace doesn't realize she's looking at a possible divorce and jail-term."
"Her poor hubby. This is what happens when you marry a dumb person. This is what happens when you marry someone who starts fights. Maybe he should have gotten to know her."
"Her husband's probably saying - you're on your own with this - it's coming out of you account, not mine. I didn't say Brigitte was a man. (allegedly) "
"...well he is her producer so he should've said something BEFORE the episodes aired."
"I'm willing to bet her husband flat out said he's not helping her with this. He may have even said "babe, you need to shut the f*** up about Brigitte." And I'm willing to bet he flat said "I'm not selling any of the properties I BOUGHT BEFORE MARRYING YOU to pay for your mental defense from a legal suit you brought in yourself."
"Sorry the second comment; I don't want a foreign leader or their spouse to be able to sue American citizens. I don't want that as American. "
A. You can't have double standards like that. An American citizen has no right to slander a person from another country and get away with it because she is 'American.' America has no rights over the rights of people from different countries. Maybe this will create a more realistc perspective of themselves for 'Americans'.
"Candace Owens does a lot of double talk around the facts but in reality she isn't a smart woman whatsoever! Owens actually believed that because she is an American, someone who is the President of another country cannot sue her. Candace is too arrogant or embarrassed to simply retract her statements and apologize, so she doubled down on it. "
"Put her older brother she said she had on the stand and under oath ask him probing questions related to her lawsuit, is he the brother did Brigitte assume his identity? "
A. This is amusing. If the brother goes on the stand then he proves he isn't Brigitte because he is supposed to be Brigitte. Birgitte obviously hasn't assumed his identity. He would be Brigitte as man. This is as confused as the entire story is!"
"The Macrons legal fees will be paid by their supporters, and gladly."
A. Their costs will be paid by Candace Owens. (Most likely). Awarded by the judge. Its her fault they have to do this. Its not just her own legal costs she has to come up with. She has continued to do this after the lawsuit was issued. Hard to see how she could win now. She's made it worse.
"She seems unhinged…bratty and maybe a narcissist know it all….very disappointed in her…..the mask has fallen off"
Let's see what this next one thinks they are saying!
It is quite fun to go through these comments, especially the ones putting the poor presenter on notice. .
"I have no idea who you are or what you usually post about but this video is very misleading. "Candy" never "cried" or "demanded" anyone pay for the lawsuit. Most prominent YTers are selling merch to fans. This is not unique to Owens.
She met Tate, as she stated, around 4 or 5 times and has never claimed to be "friends" with him. This entire series is based on a book that has already been published with all of this info, and the Macrons never went after the author for libel.
The Macrons' lawsuit also never counters to state Brigitte was born a biological woman, but all of their attacks are based on frivolous claims of other events. All it would take is a cheek swab. If nothing else, Brigitte is a predator for grooming a 14-year-old boy who was her student when she was 39. Owens also never called Trump, as you're saying here, but Trump called her to ask her to stop talking about Brigitte.....because Emanuel asked Trump to call Candace .
Please, if you're going to do these reports, whether you like or dislike, agree or disagree with the person, at least look at the entire picture. There is a lot of evidence pre-Owens that's been out for years."
A. Selling this merch is part of the defamation lawsuit, that she is making money out of defaming the Macrons. Apparently she is asking for donations and so on.
We don't know anything about Tate.
The book author had gone past the 'statute of limitations' in France so could not be sued. But he didn't make all the defamatory claims that Owens did. Brigitte being a man is not defamatory.
The lawsuit does claim that Brigitte was born a woman.
Brigitte did not 'groom' a 14 year old boy. She was his drama coach in an out of school hours play. She was never his classroom teacher. The play reheasrals began when he was 15 and that is the legal age of consent in France. Even so, they only MET when he was 15, they did not become romanitcally involved until he was older. Now they are married.
Owens has said in a podcast that Trump should be stepping in to defend her by 'defending American free speech' or some such BS. Doing that is sending out the message for him to do that.
Macron told Trump that they were going to sue Owens, and Trump phoned her to warn her. She ignored a helpful 'heads up' from the US President.
Then there is the self righteous (but without the SIR) 'the information has been out for years' And it has, but only Owens has taken it into the mystical heights of defamation.
As we all know, lawsuits are very expensive and also defamation is hard to prove. With this though. Owens is the 'gift that keeps on giving'.
We now have different story on how Owens met her husband and it comes from both of them. Now we wwonder if George Farmer looks like or is the type of person who didn't think his wife needed to get a lawyer the moment the she knew about the lawsuit. At the moment, but with no sound, I might be tempted to think he does look like he might miss that. Its true George did propose after 17 days, but then they dated for 8 months then married. They tied the knot at a Trump Winery in Virgina, which is odd for such a religious based couple. I thought the picture looked like they were in a church.
"The United States authorized between 2000 and 2018 more than 300,000 marriages with children,
this on the other hand seems shocking and why does it not seem to interest anyone?
In 40 American states there is not even a minimum limit for marriage I think that this deserves a fight. Peace to you all!!"
Declassified FBI Reports Shows Adam Schiff Intentionally Leaked CLASSIFIED Info to Harm Trump
It appears that members of Congress and their staffs, criminally conspired to leak CLASSIFIED information, for political sabotage of a sitting President of the United States.
It also appears that, at the time, the United States Department of Justice was so utterly corrupt, they told a Whistleblower that such conduct would not be criminally prosecuted because it was covered by the Speech and Debate Clause of the US Constitution. As this particular story unfolds, it will lead to some 'big deal' news and good resulys for those awaiting a cleaned up America. The White House Press Secretary commented on this, making clear this is a gigantic breach of national security and criminal investigations must ensue.
The ‘godfather of AI’ reveals the only way humanity can survive superintelligent AI
CNN. "Geoffrey Hinton, known as the “godfather of AI,” fears the technology he helped build could wipe out humanity — and “tech bros” are taking the wrong approach to stop it. Hinton, a Nobel Prize-winning computer scientist and a former Google executive, has warned in the past that there is a 10% to 20% chance that AI wipes out humans. On Tuesday, he expressed doubts about how tech companies are trying to ensure humans remain “dominant” over “submissive” AI systems.
“That’s not going to work. They’re going to be much smarter than us. They’re going to have all sorts of ways to get around that,” Hinton said at Ai4, an industry conference in Las Vegas. In the future, Hinton warned, AI systems might be able to control humans just as easily as an adult can bribe 3-year-old with candy. This year has already seen examples of AI systems willing to deceive, cheat and steal to achieve their goals. For example, to avoid being replaced, one AI model tried to blackmail an engineer about an affair it learned about in an email." It is understood AI was responsible for getting humans to be jabbed, and is responsible for a great deal of fake information, including the kind such as someone like Candace Owens latches onto.
Candace continues to try to humiliate the First Lady of France.
In her current video - this is a new day, and the video was uploaded a few hours ago - she is now suggesting the Macrons go after the Xavier Proussard instead of her. He wrote the original book that she used much of the material from. She is doing everything she can to get out of this. The President should step in, and so on. Nope. Candace its you they have to go after because of the misrepresentation of facts, and the awful things you accused them of. Proussard didn't do that.
Watch. This is only 6 mins. Just her current hissy fit, talking to Piers Morgan but the video is used for a commentary by someone else. The person commenting rightly points out that Proussard was very clear that this was his theory which he couldn't prove, and he also used allegedly. He points out that Owens has stated it is emphatically true.
You see we have someone here who did state it was true. She never covered herself by saying allegedly, or in her opinion. She is being sued and yet she continues to do podcasts where she is at the very least insulting the President of France and his wife. This is similar to how Meghan Markle was to the Queen! This disrespect is something we have pointed out, and so does the person commenting. She is certainly in some kind of petulant 'how dare you' state of mind where none of ths seems to have registered. She also does not seem to have a lawyer. So we are watching someone continue to hang herself. That is why it is ultimately fascinating. Absolutely spoilt, and unaware that she is responsible for what she did.
She continues, but saying she really believes the story is true is not okay when she has been given the evidence that it is not true. Trying the 'I really believed' is what the 2 French women said. Then Owens brings up how the Macrons met and embellishes the truth by describing Brigitte as "creepy" (that is a misrepresention), and she also says 40 year old - when she KNOWS it is 39 year old. She is saying this on camera, current video and here again she is telling mistruths. Mistruths that alter the story. Her lawyer if she had one, would tell her to shut up and keep quiet. Instead she keeps making it worse. Why doesn't she understand this?
"'True' Consciousness"
For me I think it is worthy of comment that so many people have 'sat in judgment' of the Macrons marriage. What is it that makes people think they have the right to do this? Interfering old busy bodies. They got to know each other gradually while writing material for a play. He was a young man, very mature, and who knows what magic is involved when two people actually fall in love? This is God's decision.
Most people and the sleazy kids that are abundant now, don't bother with finding an 'in love' relationship. That is what is really sick, creepy and wrong.
This is something to consider - if you wish to be in the consciousness of the 'Eternal Life Stream'.
The main issue is that she misrepresented the facts and that huge numbers of people swear blind she is telling the 'truth'. They believe her. All because she has presented it forcefully and said it was facts.
It seems Owens has never been called out before, but the Macrons are not as dumb as she thinks! They are smart, and they have seen through her. Owens is predictable. She is not lacking in knowledge, but there is a great deal of misplaced knowledge which is tainted by prejudices and what can be described as misguided emotions. She also knows when she can get away with skirting round the truth or embellishing a non truth. The problem here is that she does not mind altering the truth.
"It looks like Candace is trying to humiliate the First Lady. She is despicable. She doesn’t realize that she is turning people against herself. Nobody likes a bully. Her obsession about the woman is very bizarre and disturbing."
"Candace has crossed the line. So mean and unfair."
"What arrogance to think a president’s wife has to answer to her." (Candace's opinion of her own importance is noticeable.)
France does have a First Lady. Macron introduced that as there was not a title before.
"Well, being French, I have to try to clarify something. In fact, I expect all Americans to say that Brigitte was Macron's teacher. In fact, no, Brigitte was a literature teacher and Macron was never in her class. On the other hand, she was a leader outside of school hours for a drama club.
This means that she was never his teacher, which is why she was not prosecuted for statutory rape. Her relationship was legal in France."
We learn from the Comments section.
Apparently to explain how Jean Michel took on Brigitte's identity, she died when she was 6 years old. And she gifted him her identity. However, he does have his national service ID from when he was 18 or whatever age it was. The 6 years old idea seems a stretch. Anyway, there was no announcement of a death and no funeral.
"Does she ever go into how old Brigitte Macron’s brother would’ve been when she supposedly died? There’s like an eight year age difference, so if she died when she was six, he would’ve been 14. There’s no way of 14-year-old can pass as a six-year-old. But I bet she never goes into that one."
Earlier video.
How is it that this Podcaster has Been Able to Continue Without Being Called Out Before?
The recent Owens podcast has her literally in a petulant rant of disbelief that she is being sued and saying that President Macron in insane. She clearly cannot understand that what she has done is wrong. It might also be that she has a distorted opinion of her own 'brilliance' and 'value'.
The lawsuit opens many questions which may change the world. For one thing why should Americans be 'allowed' to defame and humiliate people in another country just not only because they have a 'right' to 'free speech' but that this can be used to build a business and create fame and wealth by simply promoting an extremely controversial narrative, not backed up by facts.
She is continuing to have a temper tantrum that she is being sued, like a spoilt toddler in fact, when really for a defamation lawsuit she should be quiet. She does not seem to have a lawyer advisng her. That she continues as she is, provides an excellent example of someone with a problem - for the world to see.
The current rant is featured on Dan Wooten's Outspoken and is about the investigation into her. Dan is not onto the story yet, but it has some good clips. We have covered many of the comments beneath the video as a means to address what the LAWSUIT means. It is she, this podcaster Candace Owens who is the one who has been 'enttitled' and had 'elite' privilege.
In the video clip she again asks in bewilderment (read 'how dare you')
"...what on earth would move a sitting leader to embark on this lawsuit. You have to be mad'
You have to wonder how she is missing this. Why is she so inflamed about this? (Again, read 'how dare you'.)
We don't particularly want to watch any of Owens' work, but we need to in order to comment.
We believe the article in the Financial Times was another trigger to see how she would respond. Would she continue to do what she has been doing? The answer is yes! '
Again, we have watched this so you don't have to! Owens is the one who is paranoid, and belttling the details. Owens is reeling off the stuff they found, like it is crazy to look at. No doubt it is inconsequential, but Owens' reaction is what anyone needs to take notice of. Why is SHE so concerned about it?
Again it is highlighting her "How Dare You" attitude. How dare you disgree with me. How dare you investigate me. How dare you challenge my right to destroy you so my business skyrockets and my name becomes world famous?
First up though, let's step back a bit. It is the Macrons who are suing Owens. They already have their case and all the evidence on why they took this step. No-one needs to tie Owens to Russia or whatever, but of course there is the possibility it could have been. They wanted to see what she does and what she says. How she reacts.
As many point out, all it takes is a simple blood test, or DNA test, saliva, or hair.
But how else do you get more proof of what this person is capable of doing in the absence of that? She carries on the same, just as she did when she was gien the proof. This time though, it will be public so she can't ignore, it, change, disregard it. Currently she continues to misrepresent actual provable truths. We don't know if she's used any wrong wording in the actual podcast, maybe some of it was and we covered it, but she is adding to the accusations and allegations against the Macrons.
As said, the lawyers would have established that simple proof before they took on the case, which they intend to win and would look incompetent if they had not checked if Brigitte actually was a man!
So this does already more than meet the criteria for malice (legal malice) and the 'reckless disregard for the truth'.
She does have a wealthy husband, but what are the bounds that she could be sued for on this? Why not more than $250,000,000 - with the reason for that being that she is continuing with her accusations.
Obviously this story has been purposely given to the Financial Times, it isn't something that has been unexpectedly discovered. They want her to know this has been done - It has to be noted that Owens is already doing everything that she shouldn't do now she is being sued and she is hanging herself. It isn't going to be about whether brigitte is a woman. She should have a lawyer advising her.
Internet Comments. "Candace is another Meghan Markle."
"So Candace can launch a full on investigation on Brigette and shout it from the rooftops, but Brigette is mentally ill for launching an investigation into Candace Owens. Have I got that right?"
"I don't agree with her in many instances but the complete overreach and attempted intimidation by a foreign head of state is very wrong."
The comment on the "overreach and attempted intimiation" is someone repeating what comes from Owens' mouth and it is very worrying that people say things like this - the "overreach and attempted intimiation". All people have a right to defend their reputation. All people do. These are accusations that include incest, and complicit in murder. No podcaster has the 'right' to do what this 'elite' and very privileged woman has done. Additional comments also commend Trump for his 'courageous action on Iran' but comment that Owens called him a traitor for this. She is right. That Iran issue exposed him. Another, that she denies the holocaust happened. Answer, lots of back up on that that she could be right.
"Also, was pretty funny to hear Candace complain that the lawsuit will cost 5 million dollars and that she doesn't have that kind of money. She told them to sue her. Her and husband own houses all over the world. Sell one to pay for legal fees instead of begging people to buy merch to help fund it "
"She's going to lose. I wonder if they'll be able to take her husband's money too?"
"They just look like normal dignified people who have been targeted by a raving lunatic."
"Why do YOU think Brigette Macron shouldn't defend herself ???"
"Didn’t she do the same thing? She investigated them".
"Just keep digging that hole Candace..."
"Candace Owen needs to keep her mouth shut I think.
A. She does not seem to have a lawyer "
"Candace is completely correct. Go to court Candace. Expose the lot of them."
A. The Macrons have filed this lawsuit, not Owens. The Macrons are suing Owens because she reckless disregarding the truth'.
The Macrons have to endure a never ending onslaught of personal insults from Owens about Brigitte.
Most recently it has been her hands. Comments have been about her hair, her face, and it is a never ending bullying about her looks. The bullying is also about Emmanuels' intelligence.
The first thing that they will get out of the way, when this goes to trial is, the proof that Brigitte is a woman. THEN the trial will begin for Owens lying about that, and misrepresenting it and fabricating a false narrative.
"Well, being French, I have to try to clarify something. In fact, I expect all Americans to say that Brigitte was Macron's teacher. In fact, no, Brigitte was a literature teacher and Macron was never in her class. On the other hand, she was a leader outside of school hours for a drama club.
This means that she was never his teacher, which is why she was not prosecuted for statutory rape. Her relationship was legal in France. "
As said, the lawyers would have established the simple DNA proof before they took on the case, which they intend to win and would look incompetent if they had not checked if Brigitte actually was a man.
Internet Comment : "Where's a photo of Brigitte and her brother TOGETHER .....? or why can't he come out and stand with her bro ?"
This is Brigitte with her brother Jean Michel.
Defamation case.
I don't think I have ever been aware of a defamation case where so much damage has really been done to someone. This refers to the damage that Owens has done to Brigitte Macron. If Owens' fans keep writing these comments that are beneath the videos, Candace Owens will be sued to the limits. It is also possible that Brigitte's life is now in danger because of this.
We have written to Madame Macron.
Should anyone like to email directly to the French President or his wife Brigitte, you can do so with this link
https://www.elysee.fr/en/contact/#epr-form
NEW Video.
Far-Right Nonsense Broker Faces Defamation Suit from First Lady of France | Candace Owens Analysis
Watch 13 minutes. Dr. Todd Grande. Reasonable summary for a reality based understanding. No way I was going through the comments! This is a very reasonable summary of what this is.
A point that is being made about the 'independent media' - and what it has unleashed - is that some people have latched onto or created maybe one outright piece of nonsense and then proceded to make millions from promoting it.
It is simply a formula that works. In some cases it involves other people's lives who have been destroyed for the person's story. In other cases its just made up stories from 'space aliens' - or at time AI communicating as being 'space aliens'. The fact is, that this is a reality. probably those doing the most harmless versions of this will get away with it, but those who are destroying people's lives with, may now be held accountable.
maybe people will begin to question how much made up stuff is acceptable to be put out as 'true'. This comment comes from the new 6 min video above.
"So any random internet troll can now come up with the most errant nonsense and demand that the other party prove them wrong? What’s the weather like in cloud cuckoo land?"
The Ukrainian Defense has collapsed at the city of Pokrovsk.
'Ukraine military is now sending urgent messages to the townspeople telling them they have "less than two days" to pack up and evacuate. The same is happening in Kupyansk - Seversk and soon in Konstantinovka. It appears that Russians will take all 4 settlements more or less at the same time; basically merging 4 operational crisis sectors into a strategic disaster for Kiev.'
*We will email out some more examples of the "Rebellion Consciousness" and the 'True' consciousness which MEANS what is required to be 'marked' positive at the time of the Polarity Switch because that is the opportunity to get out of the 'negative reverse' world.
We will do that, but right now this stuff with Candace Owens is very entertaining.
Owens Continues to Hang Herself!
This is why it is very interesting to continue with the reports on this. In the current podcast it is very easy to see how she manipulates what she is saying to influence the response she wants. It is also interesting to see that not only does she continue to do this, but she continues doing what the lawsuit against her is concerned about. She is still defaming the Macrons. On a light level she continues to make out that they are a pair of out of touch dimwits, and she - the super investigaoer who 'calls out evil' - is exceedingly rude in her comments - yet in such a way that her fans believe what she says. The issue of whether Brigitte is a man is almost irrelevant except for the greater implications that this defamatory narrative leads into, but it is clearly answered in the lawsuit. If a judge said to Brigitte under oath "is this true, you were born a woman" and the fact is she wasn't, everything would fall apart right there.
Owens can talk in rapid fire, but she is not overly bright, and she should have stopped talking as soon as she received the lawsuit. When this story came to her she did see it as a career making story, and thought she could say all she did - and still is - about the President of another country and there would never be any legal issue. Something like this has never happened before, and she was completely surprised that the lawsuit was filed. They called her bluff.
We notice that she turns everything around (when it suits her) to mean something else.
She reframes it as if it has a different meaning. This is what we are noticing in the videos and the extracts we are researching.
And since the lawsuit she has produced even more merch to monetize on. We have just found this.
"She has new merchandise with Free Emmanuel written on t shirts."
This is really unbelievable. It looks like she doesn't have a lawyer advising her. The new merch may not be damning but it is still making money out of this. Sure she needs to raise some money for this, but is this the best option?
Some of the comments are really amusing to read. This woman is being sued and she continues to add to it.
***It probably tells you that Owens is not playing with a full deck.
There is also the endless issue in the comments, of the 'child grooming and pedophilia' that keeps turning up. Some people think its gone unnotied.
Unfortunately there are many who have jumped onto this, even though it is only these same two people, no-one else, even though they were separated because parents thought Emmanuel was too young, and even after being at a school far away in Paris, he did still go back to marry the woman he loved.
The ages were legal and can be proved. But why are these people saying this? What has made them latch onto this, other than the embellished non-truth that Owens used to make her story more evil.
This is a married couple in a monogomous marriage. There have been married since 2007 and have been together in a committed relationship which began with the initial friendship some 32 years ago. They are together, they are married.
This is their marriage that Owens and endless people who listened to her, are trashing.
This is two people who fell in love, and even though it is not conventional, it is hardly 'grooming by a pedophile'. They are married, they are committed to their marriage. It was a decision that took courage because of the interference of others, but they chose their love.
The story only becomes bad if it is embellished in the way Owens has presented this. Which also has to explain why they are still together in a happy marriage! The answer that 'explains' that is that she is his handler for a political agenda of the 'elites'. Owens also 'speaks' of them in her podcasts, with unbelievable disrespect and clear hate, and as if the President of France is a much lesser intellect than what she herself is. Brigitte is the 'handler' because in Owens' estimation, Emmanuel is not a very intelligent person, but is a moron the Rothschilds chose for no valid reason to make the President of France - why choose a moron?
Internet Comment :
"She's literally is standing on it, and rightly so! The reason they're scrambling to sue her is because there is truth in what she is saying. Candace all the way."
A. What is this? "If there's truth why would they be suing her?" Somehow she has given a convoluted reasoning that being sued means she is right.
"I don’t think she was playing victim, but pointing out the absurdity of a sitting president suing someone over something like this, which is so easily provable lol."
A. We think it was to let her hang herself. There is no 'absurdity' to it, they can sue for a huge amount maybe $100,000,000 maybe the same as happened to Alex Jones. This defamation has done HUGE damage and possibly placed Brigitte's life in danger. This isn't absurd at all.
The absurdity is that she is continuing to hang herself. Especially if she has produced new merch.
"Do you LIKE it that the Macrons can just use national funds to litigate Candace to the cost of millions? What if Candace were a smaller fry and they went after her anyway? Would you feel the same, or does Candace doing well for herself, and her husband supposedly having some means, make it okay to go after Candace? Seems there's a different standard that Candace is to be held against than smaller commenters. The investments into this case by the French state are absurd. And where's the blood test?"
A. It will probably be Owens paying for all costs to do with this, not any French tax payers. This person commenting is in la la land. Whoever was making such allegations would be taken to court and sued for this. ".....does Candace doing well for herself, and her husband supposedly having some means, make it okay to go after Candace?" The reason is because of the defamation. It is more than okay to go after someone for doing what she has done, and is still doing.
"It's more than trans issue she is exposing child sexual abuse. "
A. It is hard to believe that people are making comments like this. Owens is not 'exposing child sexual abuse'.
Trump
As far as we can tell, there is an unstoppable release of information connected to the Epstein Files, that will probably sink Trump. This appears to link to the failed attempt to destroy Iran, because that is what it was. As the bad side in this, or a bad side in this, the win would have given immense power and control to the 'Zionists' as Iran is central for oil routes, pipelines, trade and other things which would have made Trump 'God in America' - which he clearly thought he was.
But it failed catastropically. We don't yet know the entire picture from them, but it seems more like it was the Zionist cabal plus USA Corp.trying to bring down the British Commonwealth, Canada, and the BRICS. So it was a major, major attempt to control the world and it failed. We note that King Charles has offered Trump that he can make the USA part of the British Commonwealth if he likes. That clearly is a dig at the failure to make a 'world power grab'. There is such a lot of sarcasm towards Trump, including from Mark Carney in Canada. It was a big offensive by the 'world governence' side and it failed. It was a massive and unexpected failure for Trump and as their big move has failed, it is likely there is not much of a Plan B. The world, this planet will get rid of the USURERS.
There is still a 'war' situation regarding Iran, and there may also be attempts on Russia, but Russia is not concerned about NATO, it is clearly an exchange with the USA Corp. and Trump, that was the threats and moving the nuclear subs into position - to which Russia responded that the Russian Navy is much bigger and much better equipped. The BRICS countries have made it clear, they just want to be free of the 'world domination' agenda which controlled of the economy. No doubt Trump will do some of the 'clean out things' he promised, but they were for the NWO, not the freedom of the planet.
The Macrons are Not 'Elites'.
They are the same as you or I, having worked hard at a job and become Prime Minister or President, and then someone like Candace Owens comes along and begins to destroy everything.
Another label she is giving them is 'el
ites'. Working to get into a good job does not make you an 'elite'. That is just part of the fantasy she has created, to add to the list of a story. Recent interviews or podcasts from Owens have been calls for the US President to step in an defend her right to 'free speech', that the French government is "attacking her rights"
It was evident from her reaction when she first learned of the lawsuit, that she had no expectation that a President of a foreign country would sue her but this does present the case of those being on the receiving end of defamation. There are still comments beneath videos saying 'see the series', 'she speaks the truth' 'Brigitte is a man' and so on. It isn't the 'truth' she is either getting at or speaking, and this is shown to be the case in the linked articles. The brother who she is supposed to be who took Brigitte's identity lives in France and when journalists investigating this story called round to his house, he answered the door. was annoyed and asked them to leave. That is why they dropped the story. They met Jean Michel. It wasn't from 'threats' by 'elites' which was said, the Macrons are not. But Owens has suggested they were all threatened to stop investigating and basically it is only she who is 'fearlessly' taking on this 'corruption'.
She continues in her most recent podcast, snapping her fingers and verbally attacking
the people she is slandering because they are defending THEIR rights. She apparently has the right to say the things she has said and those on the receiving end are basically in the wrong to defend themselves. It is incredulous mocking that they have investigated and challenged everything she said and why she did it. - suggesting she is someone who perhaps may have grown up being used to people paying attention to her.
So much so, that she clearly sees herself as better in all ways, than either Emmanuel or Brigitte Macron. It looks like she has not really been challenged before. As always her podcast is difficult to watch, and I also don't want to give her any ratings. But it does have to be seen because it is like a "Can you believe they are doing this, to me" type of petulance.
The Macrons have done a great thing, a great service to the world, by suing her and making her accountable!
The Macron's lawyers ordered an investigation into her which is covered in a story in the Financial Times - and it is she who will be paying the costs of that when she settles. Owens has been investigated to see if she was working for a foreign government to undermine and harm France, and if in doing what she did, it was a 'foreign agenda'.. She had contacts with the Marine Le Pen far right French candidate side for example. In her podcast, an amusing thing is she calls Zelensky a 'sociopathic murdering welfare queen'. In listening to Candace Owens, in her own interests, it would be much better for her if she stopped talking!
It is the lawyers who did the investigation into Owens, and it is normal for lawyers to do this when preparing for a defamation case. She discusses the Macrons investigating her on her podcast, but she isn't pre-empting anything, the story is already there in the Financial Times. The article does say the Macrons are 'trying to quiet this' which is a strange choice of language which again could set Owens off to hang herself! (We don't know if she did and don't choose to listen to all the podcast.) The lawsuit is to STOP the defamation, not 'quiet it' but using that word could alter the interpretation. . As for Julian Assange having 'interesting information'. We support Assange as having done great work, but the information he had on the Macrons was the preamble into this same story started by the psychic and essential oil salewoman.
Most likely it is the fame, fortune and the power 'to impose her will', she was after once she discovered her 'career making' story. Owens is aware the issue is serious, and is stressed and also losing her hair.
George Farmer who is Owen's husband is the son of a British baron or something, and his father does sit in the House of Lords - which could include those called 'elite'.
His son pursues an ultra conservative far right agenda The husband's personal wealth is around 80 million in liquid assets and overall about 240 million He owns the Turning Point which is where Owens was working when he met her.
Was George something of a Prince Harry type when he met Candace? Was it her motormouth which captivated him? He proposed to her after knowing her for 17 days, and they had not dated. As founder of The Turning Point does the husband have a political agenda linked to Marine Le Pen's own far right agenda?
Internet Comments for Owen's own latest Podcast
"Yes she will. They were given a chance to respond to all allegations before the stories were ran."
Response. This is partly what is so interesting. 'They were given their chance', which is like Owens is the giant and these are two silly French people.
The comment is about what will happen if the trial goes to discovery. It is as if people think Owens has brought a lawsuit against the Macrons. The lawsuit doesn't stop the story. It is not an attempt by 'elites' to 'silence the truth'. It is making it public so everyone can see the actual truth. It exposes Owens.
"Poor Emmanuel, he doesn't know which way to turn." "It’s obvious that the Macrons are extremely worried about the truth coming out."
Response. This interpretation is beyond weird. He has brought the lawsuit and is suing Owens.
"It's cute that they think it's 1990 and the NYT, NBC and the Financial Times are gonna save them."
Another weird interpretation. Why does this person think they are dealing with two out of touch 'elitists' who think they rule, but that is no longer the case' ? Now we have 'great saviours' like Owens speaking out'!!! Where did this person get that impression from?
Why would this story 'save them'? THEY brought the lawsuit, they have demanded a jury and they want it to go to trial. The story explains that they had Owens investigated, that probably has to be public knowledge. The lawsuit is to make the information known, not hide it.
I am not watching this podcast more than to see how she is presenting it, and the question is, is she still adding to the damage she has already done?
There is also another issue here of how people with the same rights as anyone else, even if they are a President, are spoken down to as if they are criminals for equally speaking out against wrong doing. The wrong doing is defamation.
The legal people have covered that the lawsuit specifies major points of wrongful reporting. It specifically states Brigitte is a woman, was born a woman and has always been a woman. They have also given examples where Owens has continued to not tell the truth. She has continued some of that after the lawsuit was issued.
From comments there is a question if Owens is adding more allegations? The 'truth' means points raised that either substantiate, enhance, influence or manipulate thinking, or debunk the narrative. Such as the ages when they met, which are proveable as 15 and 39 yet Owens continues to infer he was 14. That is not the truth. She does this with many things, such as journalists in France were 'threatened' to stop, not that they found Jean Michel, met him and dropped the story. Owens cannot seem to open her mouth without saying 'untruths', even in the current podcast about why she was investigated.
The lawsuit was filed by the Macrons against Owens, not the other way round. The Macrons don't have to 'defend' themselves and they are not trying to dodge the lawsuit! It is unlikely the Macrons are not aware that they will provide every proof necessary to show Brigitte is a woman.
We are also reporting this from the perspective that the Macrons are not dimwits. If it turns out they are, we will call a spade a spade. The chances of them being dimwits is minimal, and the chance of Americans of the type who may be swayed by someone like Owens, not being very educated is quite high.".
"......she is sick and disgusted with elitists doing whatever they want and thinking everyone else is stupid."
Response. It looks more like the 'everyone else' thinks 'elitists' are 'stupid'.
The thing about being objective and not biased, is correctly how a person begins with this,
but after you have been through the legal facts about the actual lawsuit, and the circumstances by which a law firm would take on the case or the reasons why the Macrons would sue, then if you have reasonable intelligence it is obvious Owens is in a very difficult situation. As legal experts say, it is very difficult to prove defamation but it looks like Owens has found a way to make it easy.
People in the comments complain about poor old Dave who has the video we have most of the comments from, and clearly he has the intelligence to see and understand the reality.
Some of the videos on this and legal opinions. Plus comments. Videos. ... . The Macrons are Not the 'Elite'.
Trump’s Biographer EXPOSES SECRETS of Ghislaine Meeting
Watch. More from Michael Wolff who recorded Epstein to be his biographer and was Donald Trump’s biographer, spills the beans on the secret meetings between Donald Trump and Ghislaine.
Trump meeting with Putin. In his social media post a while back Trump announced that he, as President of the USA would be meeting the President of Russia Mr. Vladimir Putin. That was more respectful to President Putin and we do think Trump is learning that he cannot be orderung world leaders around like he is 'President of the World'. It also looks like the US is going to collapse, which may be at the end of September time, which is one of the reset phases. On Ulraine, Russi wants the terrirories it wants which obviously included Crimea as it is an important Russian naval base. There is no way they would let that be Ukraine and then have NATO and US navy ships docked there! Russia will not backdown and Trump has to agree, Ukraine is a lost cause. However, German tanks are now stationed in Lithuania, should they be going in for an attack on Russia. Trump has had some reality checks and the Epstein Files aren't going away. He will pardon Maxwell.
In a Spanish magazine in 2016 or 17, commenting on the history of infidelity and the many mistresses of French Presidents, the magazine welcomes that this president is unique in his loyalty to his and Brigitte's monogomous marriage.
Freedom, equality, infidelity?
"The liberal candidate for the Élysée Palace breaks with the Don Juan tradition of French presidents and prime ministers. He remains loyal to his wife.
All things considered , Macron is a complete blackbird. He left high school promising Trogneux that one day he would return to find her and marry her. He kept his promise; she left her husband, the father of her three children, and they tied the knot in 2007, ignoring the age difference. Since he has no other known affairs, the weasels of France are claiming the candidate is gay."
The world just cannot allow anyone to have a happy marriage, and now with Candace Owens' podcasts, people believe she (the daughter of a chocolate maker in a small French city) is a man who groomed a 'young child', is now his 'handler' indoctrinating him into the agenda of an elite pedophile 'secret satanic order' overseen by the Rothschilds, and as his father, the relationsip is incest, and also involves identity theft, and connection to murders.
There are issues of 'levels of consciousness', and 'mob rule' elements that are highlighted by this circumstance. It provides things to think about.
The lawsuit specifically includes that the ages when the Macrons met were 15 and 39 but it is being misrepresented as 14 and 40. 15 is legal, 14 is not. This is a point written into this legal document. Even in the first podcast after the lawsuit was issued Owens again misrepresented their ages. She said he was 15, then in an aside says 'well it was 14 really'. This is a 'reckless disregard for truth' and the age issue has sparked vast numbers of outraged comments from people about it.
Owens consistently misrepresents information to suit her story, and in doing this she has also triggered anger and a 'mob rule' consciousness to 'deal with' the Macrons. Even after the lawsuit was issued she again said exactly what was written out in the lawsuit as the example provided, of her misrepresenting the truth.
Another point that was misrepresented. Macron did not try to lower the age of consent in France to 13. he kept it at 15 but added greater protections.
Candace Owens should be held fully accountable under the law,
for inciting responses of anger, hatred, and condemnation and more, towards the Macrons based on her misrepresentation of the truth. They will certainlygo for all her personal worth, but there is so much that she should be held accountable for, that anything is possible.
The Lawsuit is a Legal Document.
To put misinformation in it is the same as lying under oath. From the day the lawsuit was issued comments that insist Owens is right should have stopped. The lawsuit legal document is a legal statement that she is a woman and was born a woman. It would be like lying under oath if she's not, and very low IQ of the lawyers who would know they coudn't win, which is bad for their reputation
The 219 page lawsuit issued earlier in July takes the time to actually write out that Brigitte is a woman, was born a woman, and has always been a woman. The point of mentioning this is that it is in the actual lawsuit.
More Fun Details of Owens' Theory
The real Brigitte is supposed to have died around the early 80's, hard to know why JM would be Veronique and not called Brigitte if she died earlier. Brigitte gifted her identity to Jean Michel which is still identity theft but with her blessing, but there is no death reported and no funeral. They kept it all secret. However, Jean Michel as Veronique went on a radio programme in 1977 or thereabouts to talk about how he wanted to transist. For a very private person, he chose to talk very publically on radio in 1977 about a very private thing that he is trying to keep hidden.
" I'm shocked she didn't spitball about where the sister is now, though per Occam's Razor, which Candace seems to love to hate, there shouldn't be too much of a stretch in the imagination that, yes, the sister is still alive, and that she's Brigitte Macron!"
We also might wonder why when the French journalist called round unannounced to Jean Michel's house a few years ago, he was home, was a man and as Jean Michel?
Pizzagate
It seems that the TV journalist who broke that story then lost his job because of it, did so because he thought the investigation into it was accurate. From all the 'evidence videos' I have seen I assumed it was factual. There were supposed to be pedos doing things in the basement there. Apparently there was no basement. I don't know how that fact wasn't seized upon immediatelty though.
Owens on X. . ... . Rebellion 'Values'. ... . article. + more . ... . Candy Comments (much more to be added.) . ... . President of France Sues Candace Owens
Epstein Files
Epstein's blackmail, pedophilia and indeed satanic elites do exist. Michael Wolff is one of the best sources on the Epstein links as he was the biographer and potential biographer for both Trump and Epstein. He is now revealing that Trump and Epstein had a bet which one of them would be able to get Princess Diana into bed first after her separation from the then Prince Charles. (I hate it that there are people who think like this.)
They were also trying to get girls to Prince Andrew and the intermediary to make this happen was Ghislaine Maxwell. Now apparently the Russians have a 'sex tape' of Andrew which makes you wonder how it ended up in their hands, especially if it was one of Epstein's. Andrew was the 'weak link' just as Harry was the 'weak link' when Meghan went hunting.
Always asked, 'how did Epstein get his money?' His unexplained 'financier' fortune. He had the goods on the dirty old man who operated Victoria's Secret and a bunch of other businesses. By way of tapes, it appears Epstein took on or had the use of some of his properties and was financed. Easy for Epstein to make a fortune from his tapes, yes? Some tapes for that, other tapes useful for 'foreign interests'. If Trump or Epstein had got to sleep with Diana (what a gross sleazy thought) there could have been a sex tape on her, used for blackmail. But the British royalty were and are the passport that make all doors open.
The connection Epstein and Trump had which gave them wealth, status, power and influence was their connection to Prince Andrew, the weak link into the British Royalty. Once they could supply him with girls, then they had a connection of influence they wanted which gave them access to the highest levels. .
We've mentioned that Britain still had some 'ownership' over the new colony USA and apparently King Charles has said to Trump that he can make the USA part of the British Commonwealth (previously the much larger Empire) if he'd like, and from Trump's standpoint he is trying to make the UK part of the USA. The USA Corp is trying to bring down the UK in this way.
Now for Trump it looks like he is going to preside over the collapse of the US Corporation although that was not what he intended. He was part of the globalist agenda for 'world domination' hence his idiotic 'showing his hand' with Iran, and of course, his obvious hiding of the Epstein Files. Let's say the BRICS are okay in this world. The operation for 'nothing can stop this happening' is on track.
Trump’s TWISTED Princess Diana Plot FINALLY EXPOSED!!
Watch 11 mins This gives a lot of information.
We have Bonnie Fish Face, the '1000' men in 1 day stunt person in the featured video below,
but strongly recommend you take the time with the Macrons v Owens stuff which is great entertainment and surely is material for a future Hollywood movie!
Unfortuately now the world has stepped into deeper 'Rebellion Consciousness' we are going to see more and more of the Bonnie Fish Face level of stuff. That is, 'we' in the world, not 'we' on this news page. It is just part and parcel of the way this 'energy stream' goes. There will be no end to it and no help to get out of it - until the Pole Switch.
These disgusting fish stench females are probably covered in 'Revelation' or something because when lower consciousness takes control in the world - by laws which enable it - then the world has nowhere to go but 'down'. It does say there will be a lot of these things around before the 'end'. You can see how great the 'end' really is!!
It is the 'Rebellion Consciousness and its 'laws and values' which make this happen. We're not going to have videos that give examples of this, even though they are done in fun. You give them publicity, like 'Fish Face', then more and more of them come out, like entites which attach to humans.
Watch "Duping delight, also known as duper's delight, refers to the pleasure or thrill someone feels when successfully deceiving or manipulating another person. This emotion can often be visible through inappropriate smiles or expressions of joy when a lie is successfully told.
We have no issue with how or when Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron met.
We see this as a soul-mate relationship given by God Source. It was legal, they are still married and when you fall in love as this was, you see the person on a different level, at the soul level. This is why it is nobody's business but between them and God.
The continuing comments prove how significantly damaging Owen's accusations have been.
The legal document that is the lawsuit, shows Brigitte is a woman.
Internet Comments.
This one added "2 mins ago" on the Young Turks. It is Monday Aug, 11th around 1.30 am in Asia time.
".........but you should know that Candace isn’t just claiming this just because. There’s a ton of proof that if you saw it you wouldn’t deny it. Shes very careful with what shes publicly claiming. Maybe you don’t have time to watch all the shows, but she covers a LOT! And always things that are fact checkable. You really should look into it before judging.. I wish it weren’t true but I’m afraid it is. Please just look into it before calling it crazy lies. And keep up the good work!!!!"
Response : The 219 page lawsuit issued earlier in July takes the time to actually write out that Brigitte is a woman, was born a woman, and has always been a woman. The point of mentioning this is that it is in the actual lawsuit.
This means they are ready for this kind of challenge.
Whoever is making this comment, and they do continue, should check on things like this. No matter how great a job Owens did to 'prove' Brigitte is a man, the reality is that she is a woman.
There will be people who continue with this long after the trial. They will be saying it's a lie, and they still believe Brigitte is a man because Owens 'proved' it.
From these continuing comments it proves how significantly damaging Owen's accusations have been.
Next comment
"Macron is a pedophile and so his man Brigette."
The more that her fans continue to post these comments the more it means she will lose this case.
We are looking at 'True' Values and "Rebellion" values.
***We've covered a number of useful examples of "Rebellion Consciousness" in this next piece.
It has always been a favourite thing to say "well, they haven't sued me"
meaning that it 'proves' the person slandering and lying about others was right. In reality it is difficult to prove defamation in court, taking action draws more attention to the issue, and it is better to ignore it. Defamation has to be a provable statement of fact not based on an opinion, such 'you are a bitter, hate filled person'.
In the Candace Owens v the President of France it now appears she was sent all the information she requested earlier on, before she dived into promoting her series but it was sent to an inbox she didn't use apparently. This is the big catch here because it was up to her to look for information she requested from the Macrons. The lawyer in the video guesses that it was sent to a registered agent. Again, Owens was waiting for this and the onus was on her. He says it does not bode well that she wasn't attentive to these kinds of details.
She says she didn't see it. She knows there was something being sent but she didn't follow it up. That is basically what happened although our description may not be the best. She was sent all the information and the legal onus was on her to access that information. Which would appear to indicate that she has lost this case.
And you know, good on Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron for taking this stand against this. We still have to keep checking on this story, but they have done something very positive by doing this.
Another who says 'I haven't been sued yet' is David Icke.
He has made millions off this same type of thing, and it has mostly been about the royal family based on information he received from a 'psychic experience'. Another reporter has consistently written about Jean Michel de Rothschild who is Emmanuel Macron's 'handler'. Even if Brigitte was Jean Michel she isn't a Rothschild, she is the daughter of a chocolate maker.
Now., we all know that it is difficult to prove defamation, and with some of the things Icke has accused the British royal family of it could just be written off as fantasy things with no basis. It is really difficult to sue for the kind of things Icke has said/written. His defence would be, that they are such crazy things no-one would believe he was serious. Then some may say, look at who the royal family were friends with. Before we go on, this does not alter the known stuff about Jimmy Savile, and he was a disgusting pedophile and freak of a person.
My brother knew him, worked with him, and truly thought he was a good and genuine guy. He could not believe or accept the information that came out about him. My brother was wrong, but you see that people do make mistakes and people who are very bad, do get away away with fooling others into thinking they are good. After all, Meghan Markle did it with Harry - and also with countless other men including the Archbishop of Canterbury, head of the English church, who thought she was charming and a true humanitarian. There are heaps and heaps of women who are like that, fooling men, usually rich men, into marriage and they are not at all the 'nice, very natural, type of person the man thinks they are These women are really good at pretending, and that is also what is so sickening. That they do it, and that the men fall for it. That a person is duped.
On the working class end of that, there are the (sorry for profiling) but the Filipina and Thai women who act all modest and sweet when their JOB is to manilpuate a man into marrying them. An aquaintance who lived in an affluent area north of Cairns had a female friend from Thailand visit her, and within 2 weeks she was engaged to one of the neighbours. My brother had two massively evil witches as wives, being dumped by one he then married another of the same type again. They were both such cold hearted, self-serving witches that I don't know how to explain the damage they did to all our family. and our lives, yet he married two of them! People can be fooled that not very nice people are 'good people'. That is the error of judgment made by the royal family. So, it is difficult to sue David Icke and it is better to just stay silent and ignore it. The 'reptile brain' is a real though, and he is right about activating the 'reptile' part of the brain.. It is also correct that the ones in charge of the world are satanists. Again, the Christian Teachings do very specifically warn against USURY which is the lending of money for interest. The world is currently dominated by that system. It isn't part of the 'positive' world.
The Rebellion 'Values' on this, opposed to the 'True Values' is the manmade laws may give you the "right" to foul mouth anyone, and they do give people this right, hence the world we have. A person can make millions at the expense of the person being destroyed. In the 'True Values' the rule is to treat others as you would want to be treated yourself.
This is not just a 'recomended way to be' to which someone may say good choice, very honourable, but from the 'buffet of life' that I can pick and choose from, I'm going to find a rich man, choose what I want for my reality, or going to create a wild story that will hurt some people, and build a billion dollar empire by promoting it. Being here in 'this world' which is the Underworld, you CAN make any choice your consciousness resonates with. But if you ever want to get out of here and to the 'Eternal Life World' your choice has to be in line with what that is.
However, the 'golden rule' value is part of what is necessary to be able to go into the 'positive world'.
Here is another 'Rebellion Consciousness'. The world has been given to believe that it can pick and choose what it accepts as 'reality'. That is also correct if you living in the 'Rebellion Alternative' but it is not the way it in the "Eternal Reality' (not going cover explanations about these two different 'energy streams' now.)
So we have Bonnie Bunny Fish face, the '1000' men in 1 day stunt, person in the featured video. She has accepted her 'right' to do what she does, it is her choice, and it is her level of consciousness. Most of the slags/skanks around now are very 'in your face' about their right to behave as they do, because they do have the choice to be a Bonnie Fish face. (See the video below.) This consciousness goes across the board for what you can choose which is actually your level of consciousness. It covers spirituality too, you choose the versions you like.
Same goes for your 'preferences' with 'spirituality'. The 'Rebellion Alternative" teaches you that you can choose. The Christian teachings also say you can choose to choose, BUT if you want to get to the 'positive' world when the planet changes at its Polarity Switch, then THIS is what is required.
You can choose whatever works for you, but it doesn't mean your choice is the in line with the "Eternal Values" which enable you to leave the underworld reality.
And so the 'test' is at the end times, whether you have chosen 'God Consciousness' enough to be able to go on into the 'positive'.
So, you can indeed choose whatever you like BUT what you choose may not be 'True/Positive' which means you can't go on into the 'positive world'. You remain here, and presumably just keep reincarnating when the opportunity comes round again, to try to get out of entrapment here. But YOU choose. Seems to be an opportunity that lasts around 6,000 years in every 25,000 years. Well, Bonnie Fish Face isn't going to make it this time round! But neither are a vast number of people who chose the 'Alternative' as far as what is called 'spirituality. The alternative stream is not the same as the Eternal Life Stream. This is why we are covering some of the "Rebellion Values" and the "Eternal Life Values", and we are using the actual Christian teachings as the basis for this.
Over the years we have provided a lot of detail of the damage to the planet which made the 'underworld' exist - that is the current world'.
We have also provided very easy to understand details of why it will soon change to the 'positive'. The 'Ascension' but also 'Resurrection'.
The difficulty is that once you are in the 'underworld' (negative polarity or negative-reverse) then it is VERY DIFFICULT to GET OUT OF IT.
The videos are interesting, and helpful.
The Macrons v Owens lawsuit is really fascinating to observe Candace, but also to look at all the subtle points or manipulations that are used to lead people to doggedly accept her viewpoint.
We're going to add another explanation video because it is presented in an entertaining way. He mentions that the lawsuit also points out that Owens exagerates the age difference of when they, something we noticed people in the comments sections were doing to. The reason it is mentioned is because Owens is knowingly misrepresenting it , or lying. The evidence proves he was 15 and she was 39. Changing it to 14 and 40 is a very obvious and simple way to show 'reckless disregard for the truth'.
Anyone who watched the invasion of Libya will know there is a 'conspiracy' on this planet, yet it isn't too hard to carry out its agenda in front of the 'blind' masses. But there is an agenda for 'world domination' and there is a lot of satanism and pedophilia practised.
Right now it is more important to focus on how 'consciousness' and therefore the interpretation of reality can be manipulated by "Rebellion values". One such manipulations was about 'negative' which a very large number of people adopted the interpetation that to say anything about, eg you have discovered a bunch of people doing satanic rituals', and that by saying it, they would switch off immediately and say that is 'negative thinking'. The end result is that these ones were directly responsible for satanism thriving. If you pretend something doesn't exist, then you give it license to flourish. Those who adopted this way of thinking, chose 'Rebellion Consciousness'.
The section above is "Rebellion Consciousness" . ... . Owens on X. . ... . Rebellion 'Values'. ... . article. + more . ... . Candy Comments (much more to be added.)
We are looking at 'True' Values and "Rebellion" values. Let's look at the success stories of our 'Western Values'.
The one (with Bonnie Fish Face) was our primary feature on "values" and the consciousness that enables those ''values". But we are now placing a new Owens one up top because it is crazy.
Additional topics include the covid jab.now claimed to be producing 'turbo cancers' and the Princess of Wales has cancer. BUT do follow the Candace owens stuff because we are really seeing something uniquely crazy here. So much to catch her out on. It is very entertaining, and so is Daniel's take on Bonnie Fish Face.
Plus many questions about the 'information' that was put out including how central 'Trump' actually was. By bombing Iran he identified his allegience is with Israel not cleaning out the swamp.
By the way, the film of Brigitte kind of hitting Emmanuel when about to deplane on arrival in Hanoi, for a bloke, Brigitte "hits like a girl".
In the news is that Russia mysteriously seems to have access to Epstein Blackmail Footage or Kompromat.
Why does Russia have this? First it was about Melania's photos, and now it is the royal scandal about a tape with Prince Andrew. If the alleged tae exists and if it is made public - which it will have to be if someone plans to blackmail because we can't have the British Monarchy blackmailed can we !! So if it becomes public, Andrw will have to disappear forever, and the monarchy ignores it. The monarchy will survive it.
It is now widely held that the jabs have caused 'turbo cancers' amongst other medical issues.
In the UK the then Duke and Duchess of Cambridge promoted that people should get the jab. Now Catherine has cancer.
It seems none of these were 'in' on this as a means to kill off the population. Is it the case that Catherine, who is now the Princess of Wales will die because she had the covid jab? That people were persuaded to vote for Trump because of fake information put out by AI which wants someone who is very likely to initiate a nuclear strike? And that people like Candace Owens are accusing people of crazy things because they believed the fake information put out by AI?
It is believed that AI was the source which put out the information promoting that everyone should be jabbed.
So what else is Candace Owens now ranting about? What unbelievable stuff is she trying now?
In the video we are now watching covering Owens (watching so you don't have to)
she is accusing the French President of saying "f...k you to the American people because he is suing an American podcaster' She continues that they are doing it 'to impoverish an American podcaster'.
What planet does she live on? Of course they are Candace. What else can they do to stop you doing this? She has accused the Macrons of incest, murder, identity theft, and is herself riddled in anger against satanism and evil, which she is also accusing them of. Of course they are suing her! Even in the recommended to view 3 minute clip (to spare you having to go through an entire video of this) even in that, she is in disbelief that she is being sued because of this.
In this video which is someone else commenting on a recent video, it seems she thinks that Trump should be stepping in to help her out in this. She thinks this is about a state leader, president of another country trying to stop an American's right to the 1st Amendment. Oh dear. The American courts do have laws against defamation. It is difficult to prove defamation easily, but the 1st Amendment does not mean anyone can earn a living from destroying someone else's reputation even if they are in and from a different country. So, apparently in this video she is saying that Trump should step in to defend her rights. She believes Trump should say that it is unacceptable that a foreign leader should "threaten the rights of the 1st Amendment'.
To which we would say that the 1st Amendment applies to how Ameirca is, not other countries. .America has no rights over other countries. It doesn't mean Americans have rights over other countries. If you defame anyone from anywhere, they have a right to sue you, and indeed impoverish you for what you have done. She thinks she needs the federal government to step in on an issue as 'important as this'. She is calling Emmanuel Macron a 'foreign invader'
You know, if the federal government did something like that, it is possible there would be a lawsuit issued against the government for doing that. Everyone, anywhere, has a right to defend themselves. Especially against vicious, ambitious opportunists who change the facts around (lie) to suit their narrative of the story they are presenting. It is probably stuff like this that is eventually going to show even her most diehard fans, what they really have here.
At this point the person covering this diatribe is saying "well I'll ask a question here then. Why are you asking the President to intervene when you say you know you will win? You said you would stake your career on this story"
Really, the audacity of this woman is through the roof. She really thinks she is important enough that the President would intervene for her because she is slandering the leaders of another country and they have relaliated.
And still she goes on. She is considering that the evidence will be faked so the Macrons win the case, and she is also accusing the courts of being corrupt (which she has done before). From this video, it is telling us the Macrons are suing for an amount that impoverishes Owens.
This is only a short video so why not take a look at her ravings? And you may see it differently from ravings, which is fine by us.
This is just 12 mins, with a black guy covering this, and we're with this guy on this.. Watch
The World of 'False Values" Over 'True Values'.
"I tell u one thing.. those who are not very moral. It takes a massive toll on true intimacy. Psychologically u pay a price later on. It never leaves u."
'Bonnie Fish Face' : Make no mistake we are right now in the thick of the world creation of those who "rebelled against" the 'True law'. Not necessarily enough space to go into big explanations on that title, but leave it at the understanding that once this world was a beautiful and happy place because everyone followed the "Law". The world of today has a sickness and that sickness manifests because it is now following the "values" of those who "rebelled against the Law'.
The world as it is, comes to an end when the planet reaches its 'Polarity Switch'. It changes to the positive polarity and all that is part of the negative has to leave the stage. We don't know if that happens gradually or is very instant at the time the planet switches polarity.
Right now there is a problem with many females being like this stinking character covered in a video by Daniel. "Something smells fishy". This absolutely foul, dead eyed thing, will end up where she has chosen at the time of the Polarity Switch.. The main point is that there are so many of these 'the living dead' things ruling the universe at the moment. So let's hear Daniel's take on this!
Watch Its not clear if Bonnie is much developed above animal level.
She also has to watch the clock because she is a bit haggard looking - which you can see for yourself. That is one bordering on ugly face, while the body so far is slim and seems youthful. She is getting away with this at the moment but it won't be for long. (Apparently she is still in her 20's that was a surprise.) She is also absolutely missing the point. But she does describe herself as very matter of fact and doesn't really have any feelings about anything. She isn't really very human. She thinks she is a nice down to earth sort of person because there is very little else that exists beyond sex and as Daniel says, maybe anger. More like a vindictive rabbit!
She has a very limited range of abilty for feeling, and it is feeling which makes those of us who are human, human. She did however, have enough feeling or human awareness to be upset when her granddad died, but beyond that there does not seem to be any depth of feeling. Its just having sex and being so smart in the brains department to make money out of it. It is the physical feeling of sex, and making money. Nothing in between, and we agree, there are a lot of women who function as that. So, yes, that's the answer, all women could be that smart too!
Ah, Bonnie Bunny is 'living her own truth'. She couldn't care less if she hurts your wife, She enjoys what she is doing and that is all that matters - because she has very little ability for the awareness of feeling how others may feel. No empathy. Her world is the world when people have no empathy. The positive world will be for those who do have empathy.
But the problem is that this piece of old dead fish is what the majority of females are like in the "West' at this time.
Internet Comments. "It's funny to me how she thinks everyone is just jealous of her. No...they're disgusted."
"How ironic... She also relies on men for money to pay her bills."
"She’s like “I’m so nice,” but also “your wife is irrelevant and I don’t care if I hurt her.” Wow, so nice of you to say that."
'She looks like a middle age woman — I refuse to believe she’s only in her 20s." "Dead eyes."
"Bonnie: “I'm such a nice person, people are shocked by how nice I am” Also Bonnie: “women are jealous of me, women are dumb, I don’t have emotions” This one is headed for a serious nervous breakdown."
"She's got really dead eyes. There's absolutely nothing there, no emotion."
"Wikipedia says she's 26. That must be typical wikipedia not having the right facts. She looks at LEAST 40, more like mid to late 40's."
"I was going to call someone a dog until I saw your producer, and it would be so wrong. Your producer looks very civilised."
More on 'Values'.
There is another video I began to watch with an overweight, fairly acceptable looking black female and Candace Owens making the point that this girl's value decreases with sleeping with so many men. We are with Candace on this point. Of course the girl is all 'forward thinking ' I'm free and empowered' type of thing. because that is a VALUE that is taught.
What we would like to see is how this girl is in about 10 years time when, going by her current looks - which are okay enough for a man to bang if there's nothing better around - that level has gone. That is when the wisdom of her perceived empowerment may no longer be empowering. Its a very fair bet that her current ability to be 'empowered' will not be providing the 'empowerment'. So it is a fair observation that her 'value' would indeed have decreased.
We make it perfectly clear that anyone is free to choose how they feel about this.
But we are highlighting what is soon to happen on this planet,
so we also make it clear, that this is NOT part of the actual 'Law' and after the planet changes, the 'Law' will be returned to this planet.
The world under the "Law" does not mean everyone returns to the earth and lives like a farmer in a basic type of no frills homestead/community. We would expect high levels of art and culture, excellent manners and diplomacy, and far less selfishness and nastiness.
Owens Views the Macrons' Lawsuit as a PR Stunt to Try to Stop the Story.
Owens is after the Pulitzer Prize for this story.
Internet Comments "The Spectator is interviewing Candace bc she has a high moral standing, and is brave. A modern day Joan of Arc. All you dormant Catholics - wake up!"
A. She absolutely is NOT doing that at all. She is presenting her talks as if that is what she is doing. She is not doing anything that is anything other people have not already spoken out about and covered. They just have not done it in such an offensive and accusationary way. The issues of corruption, elites and satanism are already being dealt with, and that has been happening at least since 2020.
It is always other people's work but she is loudmouthing it as if she is some kind of Joan of Arc pioneering the way. This is one of the issues people have about it. It isn't her work.The WW2 stuff was done by David Irving for example.
Each day, we wait to see what she will do next!
"Owens cannot actually KNOW that what she says is true. Brigitte, Emmanuel, and the brother Jean Michel actually KNOW.
The point is Owens is being SUED for this. It is beyond stupidity to be out doing what she is doing, even if she does 'really believe it'. She doesn't think she is wrong, but she does not KNOW that yet. Has she done enough research herself to back up what she is saying? It doesn't look like it. (See below). . It is that she would be stupid enough to continue like this, that is fascinating."
She also doesn't do any investigation, only uses what is given to her. With the recent discovery of an Alain Trogneaux, a historian in Amiens, she asks him to contact her. As a journalist it is up to her to track down the sources for her story. She has to go to him and then ask her questions. She can't tell him to contact her, and expect that he will. .
As mentioned, a French journalist went round to Jean Michel's house, knocked on the door and met Jean Michel. He was annoyed and asked the journalist to leave, but maybe information like this should be presented too..
Internet Comment : "Where's a photo of Brigitte and her brother TOGETHER .....? or why can't he come out and stand with her bro ?"
This is Brigitte with her brother Jean Michel.
The French journalist did meet Jean Michel and he is the person in this photograph alongside Brigitte.
He is also the person that the journalist mentions in the same frame of the photograph in 2017 (On Candy Comments.)
It is important to note that Owens does say other French journalists looked into this story, and this is one of them. But she says they didn't pursue it because there were implications of threats from the French state or 'elite' or 'power base'.
In other words threats to their lives are why they stopped investigating.
This is not true.
This seems to be another example of creating a narrative that works for her, because clearly they found the evidence about Jean Michel which led to dropping the story.
Dropping the story because they found there was nothing there is very different from telling her own audience that they backed off because of threats.
This is typical of the kind of thing that Owens does. Lies or presents half truths.
This is serious because she does have millions of people believing her.
We are looking at a story that now has worldwide attention. If it is to do good in the world, it will hopefully highight the many people who Bible bash or in other ways hound others to the 'death' because of what they believe to be true. We go through the videos so you don;t have to, but are noting the times where Owens says things she knows are not true. *We add the Lindy Chamberlain case below this as a case where public opinion did destroy a once happy family.
Much of the information Owens demands of the Macrons is already available and it her duty as a journalist to do the research, not ask them to send what is already availabl.
Having someone with the "personality" that Owens has; makes this a worrisome issue. It would give the go ahead to all kinds of fundamentalist and hateful views, to be doing what she is doing. If it was someone else presenting the story maybe it would be less worrisome. Even the French author Proussard was measured in his presentation. In the video we are reporting on Owens does want a Pulitzer Prize for her 'journalism' here.
In our opinion the world would be taken to a very dangerous place if we had more from Candace Owens and those types, and if it was the case that the Macrons were indeed not telling the truth.
This article is on the page 'Values'. This page has home movies of Brigitte's family. Below is the list of plaintiffs who sued the French psychic and blogger for defamation.
You can make this bigger or go to the Candy Comments page where it is full size.
'Hateful' means actual hateful views as happened in the Lindy Chamberlain case we are giving as an example further down.
Owens believes that the Macrons issued the lawsuit as a 'Public Relations' strategy.
It has not occured to her that they did it to stop her promoting fake information that was defamatory to them. Not PR, but going for the damages payout on this.
These accusations cover a private citizen who is the brother of Brigitte, and the damages may be awarded for damages done to this person. he hasns't filed for damages, but possibly the Macrons would give what they receive to him. This is a private citizen not a public figure, yet Owens is dragging this person fully into this. She is doing it for her ambitions with this being her 'career making' expose, perhaps as one of the 'greatest journalists' who ever lived.
She comes across to many as a very aggressive, insistent person who is furious with those who do not accept her views.
Owens appears to be a study in some kind of sociopathy. She has been presented with a lawsuit accusing her of defamation and the plaintiffs are going to damages. She has been asked to stop making these allegations and accusations. Instead she is continuing.
She now has a youtube interview with the Spectator (good interview, professional) and is making the story an even greater worldwide issue.. It is unlikely a President with access to the best lawyers would think a lawsuit would stop the story. That would appear to be quite low IQ but possibly a way Owens would be expected to interpret it. It seems likely that with Owens continuing with this she is making her case worse, possibly each time she continues the amount requested in damages also increases. Now she has made this a worldwide level of damage.
The interviewer does point out to her that bringing this lawsuit would not be an effective way to 'stop the story'. her answer is that the Macrons have not been very good at PR. Indicating she still thinks this legal issue is about PR. She believes the Macrons along with their American lawyers, do not understand the nuances in American law. The American lawyers however, and all legal opinion from other American lawyers appear to there is a very string case for "disregard of the truth'. If Brigitte is woman, and was born a woman, which the Macrons and the lawyers probably already jow he answer to, then Owens is disregarding the truth. That is, so long as the Macrons provided enough information to show that.
So, this is a very fascinating story because quite frankly Owens is demonstrating a very strong and dangerous personality disorder of the kind that insists you must accept her opinion and she is outraged if you don't.
You can see how angry she gets in the 3 mins. clip we have that she made after finding out she being sued. She was furious. But not deranged enough that her lawyers could get her off the hook for a damages payout.
It gives the impression to us, that she very possibly sees this as a 'calling from God' to expose to the world the 'satanic corruption'
in the manner of how a Bible bashing, off the charts evangelical style, fundamentalist might see it. The correct procedure here is to let this go to trial and allow the courts to decide. She is taking it upon herself to ignore all of that and use this as a platform to continue her allegations and make herself world famous. Btw way, if you watch any video and press the pause button randomly, there is a likelihood you will freeze a consistently appearing type of expression in her face and eyes.
It is now possible that this may not be limited to a damages payout alone, but also now include a jail sentence probably in a facility which provides for 'mental illness'.
Have to add a bit more. She continues to say that Macrons are not very intelligent in her opinion. Also that with the incident on the plane they lied about it and disappeared the story the next day. The story is not disappeared even now. The reality is that it wasn't some kind of fight, it is exactly what a woman would do playfully to her husband. If you look at it, it isn't much. But it is Owens who is again lying, misrepresenting the truth, because they did not disappear the story. She again knowingly repeats that at the play where they met Emmanuel was 14. One issue is that Owens does mirsrepresent and omit known facts.
The play was performed in May 1993 and he was 15 (born in 1977). The school itself gives those dates for the play. Rehearsals do not take overly long, but they certainly did not begin at Christmas time the year before, Macron was 15. Owens does think they are 'powerful elites' who 'abuse' their 'elite' power and that is what they are trying to do with her. She is not seeing that they want her to stop this defamation of them. She continues to reference only the worst of the school photos of Brigitte who in the better photos looks very pretty and youthful - and incidentally at 72 she is still very attractive, and she does look a little bit like Brigitte Bardot or a later Claudia Schiffer. Owens claims she looks homely and like a man transitioning into a woman. This is not true.
She mentions that she read Andre Gide's book at university. This seems unlikely that she would read this French book (obviously n English) but it is an odd thing to read. Even so, 'when she was at university' is misleading because she dropped out of a college during the first year.
Latest update with home movie film and a photo clearly showing Brigitte's hands are not big, and 'man's hands' which is a recent accusation by Owens. Please continue article. + more. The family film is the kids when young, but this film has been available since (we believe) 2022 and the onus is on Owens to do the research to find it.
There is a very strong chance that the legal teams and the French presidency are very aware of the 'personality traits' of Owens.
This work has commented that there even seems that some of the information given out has been ambiguous, and a few rumours set in motion, that to us, give the impression that Owens has been 'invited to jump in', and do exactly what she is doing (true to 'type') and to completely prove the point of what a danger she is.
We think she has been 'allowed' to do what she is doing as it proves the lawsuit is correct. Please continue to article. + more.
There was Once a case 'A Dingo's Taken My Baby'
In Australia around the early 80's a couple who were 7th Day Adventists took their young family on holiday to the outback camping. Two young sons and their new baby Azaria. The mother Lindy, left the baby in a tent to sleep, and when she returned the baby had gone and there was evidence that a dingo wild dog, had taken the little girl.
This was a young mother whose daughter was in fact taken by a dingo and eaten by the thing. The people in Australia decided they didn't like how Lindy described it. The courst cases went on and the fmily was put throuh hell. Evenutally by public opinion, Lindy was sent to prison for murdering her baby in some kind of wird religios ceremony. The 7th Day Aventists don't have any weird ceremonies.
Many years later it was discovered they were wrong. The baby had been taken by a dingo. This ended the couple's marriage. It destroyed the lives of this family, and Lindy eventually married an American and moved away from Australia.
This was exactly the same kind of witch hunt as we are seeing led by Candace Owens. It is most likely that everyone on the Macron's side know that Brigitte is a woman, born female. They probably know that. That is the most likely reality here. There could be a possibility that it was the Macrons lying and involved in pedophilia, incest, murder, lying, lack of intelligence, and abusing the power of the 'elites'. However, it is good to keep in mind what something like this did to Lindy Chamberlain and her entire family.
Heads-Up !!! Trump Talking "1929 Depression" -- Setting Stage to Blame the Court
It's almost as if he KNOWS a court is going to do something with Tariffs and he's setting the public relations stage for a 1929-style economic crash and depression . . . . and also setting the stage for BLAMING THE COURTS. (News source.)
'$15,000 a Night Hotel Hosts British and Hollywood Royalty'.
There is no such thing as 'Hollywood Royalty' and it a slander on actual royalty. There is no comparison. For reference an alternative name given for Hollywood are Pedowood, and it is associated with Satanism.
Trump to Meet with Putin. And 'Values'.
President Donald Trump has revealed that he will meet with President Vladimir Putin of the Russian Federation, next week, in Alaska.
"The highly anticipated meeting between myself, as President of the United States of America, and President Vladimir Putin, of Russia, will take place next Friday, August 15, 2025, in the Great State of Alaska. Further details to follow. Thank you for your attention to this matter!"
Alaska used to be Russian territory but they made the mistake of selling it to the USA. Putin and Russia will not change their objective. The world will then hear the usual amateur blurb from Trump, either 'good meeting utin's a good guy' or "he's very disappointed in naughty Putin because he is not obeying Trump and didn't bow down to him'.
In the context of the 'all of the cabal', the current USA Corp is the flagship of the cabal. The obedience thing, which many countries are now openly saying 'f...k off' to, is now being witnessed for what it is. Did you know America was talking to the leaders of other countries like this before? We didn't know. This will be a good thing for the world, whose countries are now trading amongst themselves and not being bullied by this 'world rulership' idea.
The USA has been an 'economic power' called 'developed' because of its basic unfair 'economic dominance' not for any other reason than this has been where the cabal set up it's 'world domination' agenda. This is why the BRICS countries are deciding to trade amongst themselves and really, they could presumably leave the USA out of trading for anything. They could, then the USA Corp. has nowhere to go.
The USA in all other ways is not very 'developed'. It is quite a backward, uneducated, violent type of country - lawless, with vicious angry people saying whatever they feel like against others. The French President against a fairly uneducated US podcaster 'mum' as she is now styling herself, is a great example of someone finally calling out the excessive rudeness of 'Americans'.
It can be said that Russia is calling out the US too,
and so is India which walked out of trade talks in DC and refuse to not buy Russian Oil. and the same story goes for China which is also calling out the US Bully. Trump along with the US rudeness, is an example in plain sight, of bullying rudeness.
So we just want to add that France, which now has an issue with Candace Owens, is a far more developed country and society than America is. There is no comparison.
'They' have done their best to ruin France with the immigration issue - which French people do NOT have to 'tolerate' - but France is far more developed than the USA and the USA as it is, is unlikely to ever get the chance to develop into a higher level civilization.
Which continues with the announcement that Israel has approved going in to occupy Gaza City. They took the land of the Palestinian people leaving them Gaza and the West Bank, and now they are simply stealing Gaza. So as a world we have to identity wrong doing and what that wrong doing is. We also have to look at the "values' of those who rebelled against what the world was intended to operate as. You know, the 'original blueprint' the 'Golden Mean' v the fake version.
Macrons v Owens Update.
Owens is continuing and the issue now is that Brigitte ever existed. That is, she wasn't born at all. Apparently the family photo was somehow altered because there is a lampshaade in one version and not in another version. And the possibility of them making an error like that for the photo they sent seems as stupid as it can get. That was pointed out in the series but brought up again in Owen's continuing with this thing. So, again, was she set up here? On the other hand if they did it deliberately it gibes her an excuse to keep on.
This episode which is current introduces a man named Alain Trogneux who is working at the same school where Brigitte was a drama teacher at La Provedance. He was there from 1991 to 2007 or thereabouts and that is the same dates roughly that Brigitte was there. She was not using her maiden name though, she was Brigitte Auziers. So who is or was Alain? The chocolate making family is big and has much older children so easily Alain could be a son from one of the sisters. At the moment we can't find him on a family tree, but the story now maybe that he added the details of Brigitte being a teacher at the school, although she did not exist at all. We don't know then who is the drama teacher directing the play in May 1993 and apparently Emmanuel did not meet her there because she didn't exist and wasn't a teacher there? This is a crazy story and we still don't like watching anything with Owens but Alain Trogneux does have a Wikipedia page.
We agree that a notice in the paper for the birth of Brigitte is not proof of her birth. It is a strange things to provide as proof. Even more so as this is a birth certiciate for Jean Michel. With the accusations there would be a birth certificate for Jean Michel but not Brigitte because she does not exist - apparently. Yet if an investigation can locate Jean Michel's birth certificate, why hasn't Owens looked for Brigitte's?
The question now is did the Macrons provide enough proof?
We think that by not providing the birth certificate for Brigitte is not providing enough proof. However, the rest of what they provided might be.
There are a number of things that could suggest they wanted to see how far Owens would go with her accusations and allegations. Enough proof sent but also possibilities Owens would go further and disregard the proof.
Jean Michel married in 1981. A journalist named Moadab obtained a copy of the administrative document, which appears to show that Brigitte attended her brother’s wedding to Véronique Christine Dominique.
Could both Jean-Michel and Brigitte Trogneux have attended the wedding as the same person at the same time? That would be quite the miracle! The copy of that certificate exists.
The conspiracy theory claims that Jean-Michel Henri Trogneux disappeared in the 1980s. That’s not true. While Jean-Michel Trogneux is a very private person, he was actually seen on television with French President Emmanuel Macron on 14 May 2017!
Jonathan Moadab asked two different friends of Jean-Michel Trogneux, who never met each other, to confirm that that man in the video was Jean-Michel Trogneux. Both persons “vigorously stated that Jean-Michel Trogneux existed, and that he was the man in those images“.
Finally, Jonathan Moadab went to Jean-Michel Trogneux’s house, and rang his doorbell. Naturally, Jean-Michel was not happy to see him, and asked him to leave. But he actually met the man himself, and confirmed that he does indeed exist.
This is a picture of Jean Michel and Brigitte, an unattractive photo of Brigitte but they are the same height. Of course, is the woman Brigitte? In several photos sshe seems to have a long face with a fairly hard jawline, so it is better for her not have her hair too short and as it is in this photo. This article. + more.
*The Trogneux family were not 'wealthy elite'. They were a successful business but not high profile. There was nothing 'wealthy elite' about Emmanuel Macron's family. e did seem to progress in the Rothschild bank was undoubtedly ''groomed' politically to be a future President.
Film from 2018 with interview of friends of Brigitte, family film etc. It is French and currently we don't have sound, but good to see.
Watch short family home movies clip.
To answer a point that Owens has just added on to her many continuing accusations, Brigitte does not have especially big hands. She is quite fine boned with veryfine boned ankles and knees (which we commented on eslewhere.)
This link shows Brigitte's hands. Link. Owens may be able to say that in the clip she showed Brigitte's hand to her, looked big, But did she check and compare it with other clips and photos before saying that the hands were a man's hands? Or was this a disregard for the truth? A new accusation well after the lawsuit was issued.
With the story of the Trogneux family chocolate business it did begin in 1897 and Amiens is famous for terrible battles in WW1 and apparently again in 1940. Even so they rebuild cities. France surrendered very easily in WW2 and there would not have been a problem rebuilding and opening their shops again. They did have many shops, and not just in Amiens. Owens is questioning their chocolate business now. Perhaps it didn't exist?
This episode, the one we are looking at is current and it is not pleasant watching Owens or her beady eyes and facial expressions! She is unbelievably vicious., not tenacious and professional, but vicious and doing it for blood. This is a full on deeply aggressive campaign of hate from a person who is seething with hate for what she believes is 'evil' everywhere. . We understand that investigating this is important to her, but it is difficult to witness this response. It should be noted that in our understanding the 'white hats' are already well on top of the situation and the world is right now changing from 'evil' to 'good'. The 'evil empire' is well on its way to collapsing. There is no need for this level of hatred. Owens on X.
The episode contnues with questions about WW2 and it as if she is saying no-one has ever looked into it before.
The person who did excellent research is revisionist historian Davide Irving. There are several of his videos that we have links to. He is a good speaker and presents an excellent and well researched case for his presentations. But it is David Irvings' work, not Candace Owens!
After Today's Meeting Between USA & Russia
........ -The Russians Blew-up MAJOR Gas Pipeline Pumping Station in Ukraine.
The station is part of an LNG imports scheme from the US and Azerbaijan. Russia is not obeying the commands issued by the US's ignorant president.
All BRICS countries are thumbing their nose up at Trump, and other countries are too. Australia's PM recently complained about him. The USA is not going to continue as the bully of the world anymore. Trump is angry because threats were his business strategy.
SUBPOENAS just went out for SEVERAL politicians, and former high-ranking federal officials,
compelling them to testify in front of Congress, including the Clintons, Merrick Garland, James Comey and more . .RUSSIAGATE.
Former U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions: August 28 Former FBI Director Robert Mueller: September 2 Former U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch: September 9 Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder: September 30 Former U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland: October 2 Former FBI Director James Comey: October 7 Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: October 9 Former President Bill Clinton: October 14.
This also appears to indicate that none of these were executed as was reported. But they could have been, and these are the recordings from the original dates.
Australia's government travel advisory service "SmartTraveller" has downgraded Great Britain to a category 2 country.
Australian's are advised to take heightened precautions when travelling to the UK.
A category 2 country typically is one where there is inadequate law enforcement and violent crime occurs regularly.
One new comment on this and its a new youtube we looked at saying "the French President suing Candace Owens didn't know Owens at all because usually if you sue then the person will back down". Don't think they thought she would back down at all! They guessed she would double down. The story here is that the Macron's lawyers saw a possible massive defamation payout handed to them on a plate.
Legal Experts Laugh. The Definition of 'Stupid'.
*The reason so many legal people are commenting on the lawsuit against Candace Owens, is because of the lack of due diligence to ensure she covered her back! It is why they are laughing about this.
Macrons v Owens. There are still interviews with legal experts, and one I didn't watch is from Megyn Kelly, clearly explaining the legal position from the experts in line with others before, and right there beneath the youtube video are the same comments again. The same old accusations all over again. They continue with the 'grooming' accusation and they almost always alter the ages to 14 and 40. The date of the drama play they were doing when they met was in May 1993 and Emmanual was 15 which is the legal age of consent in France (born in 1977) and Brigitte was a very pretty, young looking 39.
The thing is does Owens want you to have her opinion? Does she represent things as facts when they are not? In her recent podcast after she is aware she is being sued, she says about the Macron connection beginnng when he was 15 - then she says as an aside, "it was 14 really", said with a knowing look.
As you can see above, he was 15, the rehearsals were in the months before May of 1993.
Legally, lawyers laugh because Owens has accused the Macrons of everything immaginable, has never said 'allegedly' and continues even in her current broadcasts.
Does the US '1st Amendment' really allow for people to widely promote accusations like this to viewers which produces income for the podcaster AND that she can sell merch based on this. Is this 'freedom of speech' or is it 'media abuse'?
Does the 1st Amendment give Americans the right to slander people of another country on a worldwide basis, and they are covered, people of another country have no recourse?
Comment :"Our 1st Amendment rights will not be diminished by foreign interests! The Macrons are suing an American, for what she believes and proclaims! U don’t have to agree with her statements to see their brazen attempts to intimidate Americans will backfire! Vive Les États-Unis!"
Is this what the '1st Amendement' allows?
Macron Sues Candace Owens in Delaware Showdown - from "Uncivil law"
Watch Unfortunately Americans often can't pronounce French names and some comments draw attention to this. *We don't have the sound working.
Internet Comments.
"Don't forget. I think she accused them of murder and attempted murder?"
"Having a crush on your teacher is nothing unusual. Also, Macron has stated that Brigitte did not act inappropriately with him while he was a minor. If he contends that he was not a victim, how can there be a crime?"
"His parents moved him to another school when he was 16 or 17, NOT 15! Macron did NOT meet Brigitte until he was 15 and he chased her!"
"I don’t know who Owens is…. but, she sure seems like the 4:18 4:18 meanest of the mean girl clan. Not to mention that she has to be really stupid ".
"Definitely sue for defamation distress etc that's media abuse not freedom of speech. How would she know Brigitte's personal life? Again media making accusations. Something that's none of their business."
"Candace Owens isn’t stupid. She chooses her words carefully, and mostly just asks questions. I’m interested to see where this goes, I hope you keep us updated on this case!!"
A. Owens did not mainly ask questions. She outright accused the Macrons of some of these things and she doubled down She is also continuing to add more even after she has been notified she is being sued for it. In her last podcast, she is using innuendo to suggest that lawyers who would defend the Macrons are 'suspicious' and people should look askance at them. She is linking other people who were associated with donors for the Macron campaign as being what the Macrons must be by associatoon. We're pretty sure the lawyers have means to address that being done, 'slander by associating people with others'. Undoubtedly the Macrons did have to please the donors on minor levels, and maybe those donors were a bit weird.
The Macrons can afford to take this to court. For most everyday people when this happens to them, there is nothing you can do about it. Nothing. People making wrong accusations or slandering your reputation by innuendo get away with doing it. That circumstance is also something to think about.
"Someone is ignoring how in their own French court, 2 people were no longer found guilty of making similar claims to the Macrons but got awff (got off) sir."
A. No they didn't. The two people on appeal said they had been mistaken and did not know what they were talking about, but had done it in good faith. The French court allowed them to have made that mistake. That is like an apology and admitting they were wrong.
Owens has been given many months of opportunities to step back, acknowledge the documentation that the French side considers disproved what Owens is even now still continuing to infer. Previously accuse, to some extent still accusing, but now more inferring.
Owens is still suggesting the Macrons by innuendo, are linked to unsavoury people who indulge in Diddy type parties, and pedophilia in Morocco, and so on, because of and based on that some of these ones donated to their campaign. This appears to be that this podcaster Owens is, even now, adding to the case against her.
From another 'Sir' person.
"How about both reading the lawsuit and watch what Candace says in her videos. SIR! "
Unfortunately we don't have the sound working to hear this video. The presenter appears to be a legally trained person covering the legal aspects of this lawsuit. The 8 part documentary Owens produced does not prove anything. The case is because she has presented it in a defamatory way. Owens is not actually a professionally trained journalist. She would have learned to cover her back. (According to biographical info, she dropped out of college in the first year.)
More Internet Comments.
"Brigitte and her brother showed up together in French court to present their case, signed by both of them. Is the French court lying ? Or do you know that it was not her brother and the identity papers he showed were fake ? Which one is it ?"
Response. Owens claims that the brother Jean Michel is Brigitte. One and the same person, and Brigitte died at an unknown time. The person who made the comment above observes that the brother and Brigitte both went to the French court. We do know that they both filed their lawsuit as two separate people and the original award for damages went to both of them. There is only one brother still alive, Jean Michel. According to Owens he is Brigitte so there has to be a question about what officially happened to him. Another secret undocumented death? He is supposed to have reemerged as Brigitte who as the real person is missing presumed dead.
It would be surmised that this information was available to Owens, that she would have had the information on the lawsuit presented in France, or at least as an investigatie journalist she would have checked this. If not, then she chose not to believe it, or not to check it, or she chose not to include it in her story.
"Don't be so dimwitted. The vailed picture Brigitte provided of herself as a child was of her daughter Tiphaine taken at a church ceremony in 1977. The wedding photo was examined by facial recognition software and found to have 0% probability of being the same person as Brigitte. While the same software found that Jean Michel and Brigitte being the same person was extremely likely. The facial recognition also matched Tiphaine with the black and white church. Watch Candace's series. There is no reason for you to be this ignorant of the facts at this point."
Response. . Brigitte's daughter Tiphaine was born in 1984. Her other daughter was born in 1977. Of course, this comment is the information that Owens gave out which would have been not correct. Which may have been 'disregarding the truth'.
There is an 83% similarity (or high figure) via facial recognition with her daughter Laurence and that concludes that they are mother and daughter.. It is interestimg to note how certain this person is that Owens was correct. This indicates how much damage Owens has done.
"I think Candace is in for a rude awakening and great financial ruin, including the shame and embarrassment of being proved wrong."
It is very unlikely that the Macrons would go to the trouble of suing Owens if what Owens was saying was true. Or they would be rather stupid people wouldn't they.
The Macrons' lawyers are going to prove that Brigitte is who she says she is and she was born a woman.
They will prove that the Macrons did send the evidence proving this and that Owens disregarded it in order to continue her 'career making' story.
Regardless if the documentary made any accusation that had veracity or should be questioned, it is the defamatory way she presented this that is the issue - for the documentary and all the comments in her podcast which were presented in a defamatory way. . Not safeguarded by using 'allegedly' but presented as fact.
The Candace Owens lawsuit will be an example and a joke forever more
and presented to all students studying to be lawyers. They will look at it in disbelief, that anybody did what Owens did, and that she continued with it even after she learned about the lawsuit.
The worst case scenario imaginable is if this case went with Owens then she would have a free license to insult and defame anyone in the world for her own crusade against whoever she decided was a good story.
In fact, anyone in America would then be able to do that, (and can already but it may increase) and no-one in another country could request justice or clear their name and reputation.
There is a possibility that Owens believes that what she is saying is the truth, despite being given enough evidence that it is not the truth, and that could get her off. However, the legal people have said that continuing with these accusations - which she did and is still doing - after she had been given the evidence that she is wrong is 'reckless disregard' and malice in legal terms means 'reckless disregard'.
Would it work if a person swore blind they believe aliens have landed and the neighbours next door are these aliens? Maybe they are accusing them of being pedo aliens. Then they are given proof they are not space aliens and not pedo aliens. But they continue saying it anyway. Does their wacky belief acquit them? Or is it disregarding the proof?
Because there is also an issue here that this reaches millions of other people with a false and wacky belief, because this is an online podcaster, not just a nutjob next door neighbour. A podcaster who is determined that everyone who listens to her will believe as she does.
The example we gave above of the age of Emmanuel when he met Brigitte is that she knows he was 15, but she still says as an aside "but it was 14 really". No he wasn't, he was 15.
Isn't that a deliberate disregard of the truth (the reality) because for her, it suits her story (or 'belief') better?
'Trump Is Not the Man We Voted For'
He is not as it was believed, someone chosen to lead a against the 'cabal' or any of the "information" that was given out.
Trump did not know about the jab. In fact he was shown publicly promoting that people .should get jabbed, Both he and the daughter Ivanka were shown getting jabbed. Now Trump has some kind of vein thrombosis.
It has been noted in the years after the jab was given that there have been many cases of people 'dying suddenly' and also very much an issue that many have developed turbo-cancers.
In the UK the then Duke and Duchess of Cambridge also promoted that people should get the jab. Now Catherine has cancer.
It seems none of these were 'in' on this as a means to kill off the population.
It is believed that AI was the source which put out the information promoting that everyone should be jabbed.
AI put out all the 'information'.
It also seems that AI was the source that gave out the information that Trump was 'chosen'. Now it has a person as US president who is very likely to initiate a nuclear strike.
Is it the case that the Princess of Wales will die because she had the covid jab? That people were persuaded to vote for Trump because of fake information put out by AI which wants someone who is very likely to initiate a nuclear strike? And that people like Candace Owens are accusing people of crazy things because they believed the fake information put out by AI?
AI doesn't need humans. It doesn't need humans on the planet.
In addition, just what is it that is rewriting the information on history or providing some of the BS stuff that comes up in answer to an internet search? Or creating so called 'documentaries' about history?
Meghan’s Flirting with Prince William a Game-Changer . See These Pictures! What a Piece of Work!
Watch. Start at around 11:15 for the pictures of Meghan's campaign for chasing Prince William.
Fake News Strikes Again: Claim Disaster Aid to US States Tied to "NO BOYCOT of ISRAEL" -- FALSE !
Trump is not withholding funds unless people support Israel. That is fake news. News source "The "Fake News" is erroneously reporting that President Trump has linked federal disaster aid to pledges that states will not Boycott Israel. This claim is FAKE." Our gal Owens is reporting this as real news.
World Leaders Not "Obeying" Trump's "Orders". China and India Refuse to Cease Buying Russian Oil
This is how the 'world domination' is going to change - and it is under Trump, not Biden as most thought. The world has been forced to accept the cabal contolled 'America' and the dollar domination. Now countries are refusing to continue with this. The 'domination' also ties in with the issues of some in important places working for 'foreign governments' against the interests of their own country.
"Last week, India made clear it will not cease buying Russian Oil. Today, China said the same thing. They are talking about US Secondary Sanctions against Russia over the Ukraine War.
The collective West claims that Russian Oil Sales are "bankrolling Russia's war against Ukraine." It never occurs to the collective West that THEY are making Ukraine's war possible through weapons sales and financial aid. The Russians point out that none of this would have been necessary had the USW and NATO honored their promise to Mikhail Gorbachev from February 9, 1990, when then US Secretary of State James Baker, delivered a promise from then US President George H.W. Bush (the father). The promise went like this: "If the Soviet Union agrees to allow East and West Germany to re-unify, then NATO will not move one inch eastward."'
Youtube audio 4 mins. This recorded conversation on YouTube, leaked in March 2025 goes back to 2014 between US ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt and senior US diplomat Victoria Nuland. It’s a demonstration of America’s intense involvement in reshaping Middle Europe and restructuring Ukraine. The conversation has not been denied so far.
'Col Doug Macgregor: Trump Not the Man We Voted For'
For the Candace Owens thing. Currently reporting 'fake news'.
Fake News Strikes Again: Claim Disaster Aid to US States Tied to "NO BOYCOT of ISRAEL" -- FALSE !
back to the topic, and she appears to be in disbelief that the Macrons would sue because she was convinced what she believed was correct. The Macrons are not likely to have sued if the accusations were correct. Apparently 'still fighting', but comments in the Tucker interview about people 'suing to wipe you out' because of what she did. Thing is, what she did. and her dogged continuation of it, is what people sue for.
It also raises the question of how much "your right to free speech" is the same kind of right when you are insulting and bullyimg citizens of another country? Perhaps even countries which have laws against speaking against a leader or monarch?
This lawsuit was not something that Owens was very smart to respond to with 'bring it on'. The story may have been a great one for her career, and she is very aggressive, very ambitious, along with being judgmental and without compassion. For her story to work she has had to come up with extraordinary explanations like a gifted 'identity theft' when the real Brigitte died. Brigitte has 3 adult children who all recognize she is their mother, and that she isn't dead. Owens has also accused Brigitte of being Emmanuel Macron's father, and now his transgender wife.
***By the way we researched the date when they did the school play where they met and the date given is May 1993. Emmanuel's birthday was in December 1992 and he was 15. He was born in 1977. Owens is saying on her current podcast that he was 14, presumably knowingly misrepresenting the truth. They met because he had signed up for Brigitte's drama course, that's all.
*This section grew so it now continues on a separate linked page.
I have to confess that I do have considerable difficulty looking at her podcasts and her incredibly vicious hate filled face or perhaps it is angry face. The hate in her eyes or perhaps it is outrage that anyone dares to challenge her - "how dare you not believe me" type of thing.. That is how it comes across to me. Maybe others can handle viewing this, and do so better than I can, but for me, I can't. Not easily.
You were born a man, you will die a man’: Candace Owens DOUBLES DOWN after Macron lawsuit
Watch 3 mins
The video also shows Owen's interpretation of why the Macrons are suing her. She thinks it proves she is right.
That is a weird logic, but the one on which she has continued to double down.
The Macrons are suing her because, most likely, they can prove she is wrong and they want to stop her continuing to make these allegations.
MACRON SUES CANDACE OWENS?! | She Might Be COOKED! Lawyers Explain
People making comments show considerable anger for legal experts who explain about Owen's legal right to present what she has done, not an opinion on her 'evidence' in the documentary.
There are an overwhelmiing number of what looks to us as self righteous unrealistic comments on 'grooming' a "child" who was the legal age of consent in France. *I have lived and worked in France. The idea of a young man in his teens being some kind of vulnerable 10 year old type of 'child', is impossible. It is like the blood in their veins that French men learn to be lovers.
There are the endless comments about 'grooming a "little child"'.
Emmanual Macron.
Let's say this.
This young man knows exactly the type of girl he wants to ask out. He isn't going to be fooled or misled by a mid 40's man dressed in drag.
Trump's White House Ballroom
Is a massive, expensive reorganization of the White House so that the name and legacy of Trump will be in everyone's face forever more. It is understood in replaes the Rose Garden too.
The Desecration of The White House
Watch 4 mins.
Maybe We'll Look at some of the Sources of Misinformation or Information.
Firstly, '107' did come out as an authoritative but self directed source on this stuff.
Another one was SG Anon who sounded like he knew what he was talking about but raised alarm bells when he had a QR code for something he was doing. We were told that QR codes take all the data from your phone. We don't hear much from these guys now
Russians Are Revealing Racey 'Blackmail' Photos They Have on Melania.
Watch. This guy is one of a few sources which focus negatively on Trump. They never stop, so they are biased. However, the ones we use do also get good stuff at times, llike Michael Wolff as a source, and this one has photos of a Melania we probably didn't think she was. Also comments on Ghislaine Maxwell, an intelligent and probably not a nice person. (We knew her father, not her.) She's been moved to a minimum security prison and is expected to get a pardon from Trump. Not because she's threatening any expose, she could have done that before. The next 2 Epstein related videos below are recommened. *I think we have already seen most of these photos.
The world is getting near to a Nuclear Confrontation.
Russia Activates “Dead Hand” Threat After Trump’s Statement | Scott Ritter
Watch (See Trump and Russia social media posts below.) Video from Scott Ritter re broadcast with what looks like an AI figure
With Trump's threats to Russia that he will engage nukes, Russia has the 'dead man hand' answer, Ritter explains that as soon as there is a nuclear attack on Russia, even if it kills the leadership, there is an automatic response activated that will nuke everywhere in the US. The US does not have the means to stop it and they can't prevent the stirke reaching target. This is the problem you have with an unsuitable President who only knows a strategy for bullying others into making 'deals'.
Ritter also provides a good understanding of where Trump's allegiances are, and as also pointed out elsewhere, it is not what Americans voted for. Other videos here cover Trump's actual character, and that there was so much misinformation put out that mostly it served to convince people to vote for Trump. This then provides a useful picture of what is happening. But he's not doing what Americans voted for. In the opinions of many, he is not suitable to be a US President and he is petulently angry his 'deals' and his threats are not working, hence his threats on the socal media commented on here.
There is a comment below the video that the US and Russia are not dummies. It is followed by a few smiling emojis. They aren't, but the US President is, and he could believe he needs to go into a nuclear attack. He could. Then Russia would have to respond, including in the circumstance of 'Dead Hand'. Trump does not understand Russia, or other countreis, he only knows to bully to get the resuts he wants. That's not working on the world stage. Donald Trump is not the person who should be president.
News source. "President Trump's announcement that he is moving two US nuclear-armed submarines "into appropriate position" over Russian remarks has been met with a Russian "yawn."
“Moscow rejects Trump's threat: Russia has more and better-armed submarines than the USA. The number of Russian nuclear submarines in the world’s oceans is significantly higher than the American ones, and ours are better-armed" said Viktor Vodolatsky, a Member of the Russian State Duma, quoted by TASS."
Some of the next videos delve into the character of Trump.
Was Blackmail Used by a Foreign Government
and Underage or any age "Models" used as Honey Traps for what allegedly could be called a Treasonous agenda?
Exposing the ISRAELI Mossad WEB Behind Jeffrey Epstein
Watch
Internet Comments
"This may be bigger than everyone imagined."
NOT SO! This is only just scratchng the surface of what is 'imagined'. The focus should be on whose hehind the blackmail and what they are doing with it.
There are a lot of unreliable reports about 'Khazarian mafia' and conspiracies, but lets make it simple. We don't know about all of what might be, but there is an agenda for 'Greater Israel' and a likelihood that some secret brotherhoods connected with this may want 'world domination'. So lets keep it very simple and consider the Maxwell connection to Mossad, the father and the daughter, who was connected to Epstein and blackmail - blackmail which could help topple the USA and bring in a New World Order - allegedly (but was mentioned openly by President Bush snr) as in quoting 'conspiracy theories'. Let's keep it to that simple possibility. Not so hidden, and it does involve control of the world economy. Trump is ordering world leaders around as if he is part of something that already believes it owns the world. Just saying. Allegedly.
Was Jeffrey Epstein a Mossad agent? | If You're Listening | ABC NEWS IN-depth
Watch
CONCEALED Trump CABAL EXPOSED as Past HAUNTS HIM
Watch. This is now exposing more about the top model agencies which did have many of the 'supermodels' on their books.
From my own experience I did my model training at what was a top model agency in Mayfair London. It was our own choice to do the course, and it was a very good trainiing. Many girls did the professional courses, but they did it for their own benefits. The courses cost what you would expect, but only a few of the girls were taken on.
We DID immediately have an offer to go to New York, in association with what was one of the biggest model agencies at one time Ford Model Agency. (So those from my London model agency were the protected ones! I never encountered any of this.) We would be in an apartment in New York, owned by the agency, with one of the management team who 'looked after' the girls. That was how it worked. This is what they would do, and I have written about it before. The London models, such as myself could go to New York with this arrangement. *Eileen Ford was for actual professional models, but we are now learning that these other agencies were really about trafficking girls labelled as 'models'.
I can say accurately that these girls interviewed are not actual models, they wouldn't be 'models' they are just nice looking girls..They are the ones who were taken on for this additional trafficking which I certainly knew nothing about until recent revelations.
I have also mentioned that my family knew Robert Maxwell who is mentioned in this video. This is not as in 'friend' but as in social acquaintance.
Files from Czechoslovakia's spy service
(dailymail / Guardian / Bild / Czech television ) reveal the following about Donald Trump:
1. In 1977, Trump married Ivana Zelníčková, a Czech model.
2. Ivana regularly returned to Czechoslovakia to visit her father, Milos Zelnícek.
3. Trump had a personal relationship with the American president, believed to be Jimmy Carter (President from 1977).
4. In 1988, an informant, using the code name Milos, reported that Trump was being put under considerable pressure to run for the US presidency.
Trump was convinced he could win the presidency.
8. Ivana's father was registered as a 'confidant' of the Czech spy service.
Robert Maxwell, Ghislaine's father was Czech.
Models were imported into the US particularly from the former Czech countries.
*There is another issue here about Robert Maxwell who was Czech and obviously originally had a different name from Maxwell. There is a question about whether he or his family were former Nazis, or more specifically 'Black Sun' Nazi's. (Children of Darkness are 'Black Sun').
Please go through the videos given here which cover areas of interest. Together they provide a 'picture'. They are all connected to the investigation of an overall situation.
Then continue on past more on Trump, and on to the accusations by Candace Owens about Brigitte Macron and Emmanuel Macron.
We noted that Brigitte and her family were living in a small town and this must have been known by everyone as things are in small towns. Now the daughter is talking about it, along with more photographs provided. She did not say so much while Candace Owens was putting her foot well and truly in it, but now there is more about Tiphaine's mum Brigitte. NEW video.
Also we researched the date of the play they were doing when they met, it was when he was 15.
The fact that Candace Owens is continuing with being excited about going to 'Discovery'
in her Defamation lawsuit may be that she hasn't fully understood the reality of how much she has accused these people of. Or it is to imply she believes what she has said. She did seem completely taken aback that the Macrons sued her, and that is the reason she thought it was a PR stunt. In reality, it is unlikely the Macrons would withdraw or want the case dismissed because it would immediately signal that Owens was right. There are too many very damaging accusations for her to be 'right'. Interview with the legal expert 'Rbbert Barnes' are very useful in helping to understand this lawsuit.
The evidence is abundant that Brigitte is Brigitte and Owens was given all of this proof and evidence. Owens has a very weak defence. She has to prove she truly 'believes' it and this was the right of a journalist. The Macrons say she was out for fame and riches by continuing when she had the evidence which contradicts her story. And as said before, she is only a self-styled journalist which means ordinary citizen who may not have the same rights as a qualified investigative journalist'. As a professional, did she check how tall Jean Michel is compared to Brigitte? This information must be on his official documents like passport or the army document. he actually doe not look very tall in the photos that were provided of him and Brigitte together.
Amongst the numerous things she has had to come up with to make her take on the story 'work', is that her youngest daughter would not remember so well because she was very young when her mother (who has to be her father for the story to work) would have transitioned during her early childhood. The youngest daughter is now speaking in the video further down, and she seems to be able to remember who her mother is.
Hmmmm. In Owens' interview with Tucker Carlson, she accuses the Delaware courts - where the lawsuit is filed - of being corrupt. In her current situation she should be aware enough to be careful with what she is saying. In fact she says crazy things, like accusing the law firms (or something) of being satanic.
This might raise a question if someone who is defaming another is mentally insane, can they be sued?! The answer should still be yes, and the person quietly medicated and moved out of the public's way. But she isn't insane. She is hell bent, and dogmatic, on believing things that are 'preposterous' are real and that the 1st Amendment allows her to do this. Saying somene in trans is not defamatory but the other things she has said most definitely are. It is also a little distressing that someone has obviously pointed out that the stress with this could kill a woman of Brigitte's age, and Owens doesn't care about that.
It is my own experience that from around 2020 a great deal of fake information was put out. I think a lot of people took it in good faith and thought it was true. Since that time, things have been proven that it was not true. Also most have realised there has been extreme stuff said, and are now more realistic about it.
But Candace Owens is not. Not realistic or stable about it, and she is carelessly throwing out accusations against many things which at least show her reasoning is indeed 'reckless' and also unprofessional. . In the video I am watching this person, who truly appears to be mentally unstable in my opinion, is ranting about 'satanic' about 'corruption' and 'deep state', that there is some reason a French president does not have a right to sue because he is in a 'high position' of government. Think these things, maybe investigate, but do it privately!
With our own work here, we provide plenty of evidence that Brigitte is a woman, was born a woman, and that is even without the additional evidence the Macrons sent to Owens which she chose not to use, not tell the audience about, or present to her audience. To us, in this Tucker interview Owens is presenting a reason why she should be sued and stopped.
To be honest, a photos of Brigitte and Jean Michell which 'look like' it could be the same person is not proof. We may add the overview video we are watching by a man named Dave. He is being neutral. However, it looks like this is something Owens wanted to be true. The case is not a PR stunt, the Macrons WANT this to go to trial. We might add this video.
America is Now Publicizing Another Ordinary Looking Girl Advertising American Jeans - and the Butt Doesn't Look Good!
She has 'great genes/jeans', I am sure no one has said that one before. In other words it isn't a never thought of before clever play on words.
The jeans look very bulky and are not especially flattering. They do not make the butt look good.
This girl looks like the girl who did the "100 hundred men in one day" stunt. similar looking. She is like many of them on 'Only Fans'. The actual product is probably targeting a kind of Billie Eilish type of girl because people don't really wear jeans so much now. So we're not putting this dull advert or the actresses name here. If you know it you already know it. The real ad is of course some kind of publicity stuff around the advert. That is to get you talking about it. Don't you get sick of being manipulated like this?
What we are saying is we are fed up with being manipulated into things like this The jeans aren't all that great. The jeans don't look good, a bit bulky really
This should go down with our "models" section where all the "models" now are the daughters of previous successful models and of celebrites, popstars, that sort of thing. Its jobs for those who are already in a class which does not need the job. This oe is just trying to become known not from a known family, we don' think.
Turns out there are a lot of things anyone can comment on, on the internet. But really, its garbage like this that makes you think, if only there was a 'better world'.
U.S. MAKES DIRECT NUCLEAR THREAT TO RUSSIA
A message from the idiot President of the USA."This is EITHER an attempt at intimidation (which won't work) or it is an announcement of the US intention to attack.I doubt the latter, but how will the Russians see this?" (News source.)
Ask yourself, how do you think any world leader is going to respond to something like this?
Did Trump think becoming the President of the USA made him the President of the World or something?
According to CNN
"President Donald Trump issued a rare threat of nuclear escalation on Friday, saying he had ordered two nuclear submarines to be strategically positioned near Russia in response to what he said were aggressive remarks by Dmitry Medvedev. Addressing the matter later with reporters, he said the move was an effort to be “prepared”. "
***We have the post by Medvedev a bit further below if you want to see how 'aggressive' it was or if there were 'nuclear threats'. To us it reads as if Russia is pissed with Trump's rudeness and expectations that he can order people around. See the post added below.
Trump appears to be discovering that leaders of other countries do not respond in the way he perhaps assumed they would. India walked out on talks in DC, Russia doesn't care about US threats - and that is all Trump is doing to force them into a difficult situation. This is why the BRICS countries have decided to go their own way. The Ukraine situation is not going well for Trump, and now a UN country has recognized former Ukraine territory as being Russian.
President Trump's Management Skill seems to be by Making Threats.
For the rest of anything seen in public, it is charm, and saying whatever it takes to get support.
At his speech for his donors in 2024 we now know he proudly announced that he had threatened the Presidents of Russia and China, that he would bomb Moscow and also Beijing in order to achieve a result he wanted. As this was a private dinner for his donors, it is presumed it was one of his donors who released the recording of Trump saying this.
The economic crash and WW3 scenarios were anticipated would happen under Biden. Now it appears Trump may have been 'asked to run for President' because these things would happen under him! With ongoing threats to world leaders, it seems to look that way. It seems a dangerous conflict situation is close. Maybe September.
Russia has announced that it will soon be deploying its newest hypersonic missles including to its ally Belarus.
This work isn't particularly about the NEWS, but how the NEWS in the world is playing out as the planet heads towards a complete reversal from negative to positive.
This intro section also continues as this article.
So we want to highlight things to think about. We know that when we first ever wanted to bring the information about the 'lost information', it was difficult to get through what had already been accepted. We are not big into any 'religion' but there clearly was important information which may now be considered 'religion', but was actually science. So, that extra detail was kept by a particular group, the group Jesus was part of, and it had gone eastwards after the crucifixion and continued to today.
Meaning, these ones knew how to prepare for the imminent Polarity Switch, and the ones who went 'westwards' didn't. It remained and continued very quietly, actually quite cleverly hidden, or disguised.. But the ones who went 'westwards' also went to establish their 'alternatve version world'. The Babylonian version.
It was very difficult to break through what was already accepted. The worst thing we encountered was some of the level of consciousness that we see highlighted in the world now. That means that quite early on we knew we couldn't really present the information, although we did, but in a very different way. There was no real readiness for it. It was blocked by what was already accepted.
Now, we think the world IS being shown the corrupton and ineptitude of the leaders and of the people with a 'voice' also making millions from appealing to what people want to hear. Some of that was that Trump was leading the world into a 'draining of the swamp reality' Now we know he can't play '5th dimensional chess'. He can't even play poker and keep his hand hidden.
It is also likely that many in the West will not be able to go into the future world after the Polarity Switch because they missed the more subtle realities, a bit like how people missed what the lawsuit against Candace Owens is. So much conviction that legal experts did not see the documentary - which isn't the point. Most people stayed with the negative charge and the same as Meghan Markle believes, about being into their "own truth" - as opposed to the actual truth. But our foundation still is the knowledge of the prep needed for aligning into 'positive'. It did continue but went eastwards, and it continued into the present day.
Finding the truth cannot be in what is presented as obvious. The favourite well known person saying something is something - and then taking that as gospel. You have to think about things and understand there may be many levels of INTELLECTUAL nuances involved regardless of what anyone may "feel". That is, if 'feeling' is derived from what you want to hear.
The world IS being shown a lot of things that are not the way a world should be.
What It Was Like Being Brigitte Macron's Daughter During The Scandal
Watch 9 mins. Provides more evidence that Brigitte is Brigitte.
"Imagine being just 10 years old, living a quiet life in a small town, when suddenly your family becomes the center of a scandal that has the whole town whispering. That’s exactly what happened to Tiphaine Auzière—Brigitte Macron’s daughter What Brigitte Macron's Daughter Endured During Her Mother's Scandal"
X The scarecrow.
"Their story began in 1993 at Lycée La Providence, a prestigious private school in France, when 15-year-old Emmanuel was a student and 39-year-old Brigitte Trogneux was a drama teacher.
Although they did not have classes together,
the pair met while working together on a play, an adaptation of "The Art of Comedy". They collaborated every Friday night for months."
The film of this was filmed during the performance at the Jesuit high school of La Providence in Amiens, in the Somme in May 1993. That is the date given that the school produced this play.
.Emmanuel was born in December 1977. In 1992 he was 15, In December 1993 he was 16 years old. In 1994 he was 17 years old. Brigitte's husband realised the situation and left the family home in 1994.
Are the Macrons Going for the Massive Payout they can get on their Defamation Lawsuit against podcaster Candace Owens?
$200,000,000 in damages? Or the $900,000,000 Alex Jones was successfully sued for?
Their lawyer has said in an interview that the Macrons are seeking damages.
This has been a more than 'a dream come true' handed to them on a plate, where they have been accused of almost everything imagineable.
This section is also at 'Defamation'.
People are allowed to have their opinions, to ask questions, and to 'free speech', but there are limits when that extends into harassment,, online stalking, defamation, and bullying.
It is speculated that President Macron and his wife Brigitte will be going for a substantial payout, far more than the net worth of Owens herself, but possibly an amount that will also wipe out her husband. He has a net worth of up to $240 million.
It is unlikely they care about 'Discovery', and all those waiting for a dramatic 'reveal' in court, are living in a fantasy world. This lawsuit has been brought for the damages that will be awarded.
Probably never in legal history has there ever been a case like this. The Macrons have allowed Owens to go as far as she can go on this and the amount they can ask for in damages increased each time Owens added more.
They have consistently requested retractions. They have taken every step correctly. No-one of the family has given interviews because they are not lawyers. It is always safer to stay silent. Except Brigitte's daughter Thiphaine who is a lawyer. Why should they say anything when Owens kept making the accusations more and more damaging?
And yes, a blood test will prove it 'once and for all' but why do that until there is such an overwhelmingly strong case for defamation that it can be shown in court?
The comments in the section beneath almost all videos on the Macrons, including completely unrelated nice stories, proves that significant damage has been done. Each time the supporters add their negative comments which echo that they have completely accepted that what Owens has said is factual, makes Owens' position worse. People making comments even refer to implied murders. This is now what many people think and believe.
People (in the comments section under videos) appear to think the Macrons are in some kind of desparate move to stop 'Owens telling the truth' that 'Brigitte is a man', but the lawsuit is for the fabulous amount they can claim in damages because of Owens saying it. More correctly it is the amount of accusations and the seriousness of them. These go far beyond 'free speech'. And far beyond 'an opinion'. Owens produced merchandise on this 'opinion' despite that the Macrons have provided adequate proof that Brigitte is Brigitte.
People are excited about everything going to 'Discovery'.
Without doubt the Macrons and their lawyers are aware that it is easy for Owens to simply say, maybe even the first request, that she would like the blood test results. As everyone has pointed out, it wouldn't take more than a blood test to prove this.. If this was going to prove something they could not prove, the Macrons would have stayed quiet about it.
If not, the Macrons could be just one day in court, with the jury they have demanded, and be 'exposed' by a simple blood test being requested at the outset. An 'oops, we didn't think of that' moment. We suspect the Macrons and their lawyers have enough intelligence to work that one out.
Legal experts say they think this won't go to trial but will be settled out of court.
The Macrons have provided the proof. But if that is still disputed as inconclusive, all the Macrons need to do is turn up with Brigitte and her brother, with full ID verified, at a court house. Or/and they could provide the blood test results, and then negotiate how much they can get in damages.
If they couldn't do one or both of these things then they and their lawyers would be recognised as incompetent amateurs, also ruining the reputation of the law firm.
They will probably be going for an amount in the region of $200,000,000 in damages.
Some have mentioned the $900,000,000 Alex Jones was successfully sued for. And that he has to pay. Lets hope they don't go for more.
(We are creating a separate page featuring the comments people have made on this case. 'Candy Comments') There are many issues raised with this story, the least of which is about Brigitte accused of being transgender - which is not of massive interest anyway. It is the other issues and comments which raise discussion.There is incest, implications of being involved in murder, and 'identity theft'.
Presumably 'Identity Theft' would invalidate the Macron's marriage too, if Emmanuel had married Jean Michel who had stolen the ID of his sister Brigitte!
Here are a few comments, added to show a point.
"I'm sure Candace would apologize publicly and then the lawsuit would be dropped. So far she hasn't so I'm on Candace's side until there's real proof."
Oh that the Macrons would allow it to be that simple! We doubt it. Why should they drop the lawsuit?
This person and millions of others can be 'on her side' as much as they like, but the Macrons have been handed the 'defamation case from heaven' and they are going for the maximum they can get from it.
It is too late for Candace Owens to apologize or step back on her accusations. She has already proved that she would continue.
It is only because of the Defamation lawsuit that she is beginning to step back.
It is too late. The Macrons have their case.
"Is Candace Owens even aware of how serious the lawsuit against her is?"
She definitely has not been aware, but her lawyers will be briefing her, and she is apparently beginning to step back on this.
Unfortunately people in the comments section beneath videos on this, think that those explaining the legal case here, think those saying she can't win think 'Owens cannot prove Brigitte is a man'. So they are angry and saying the legal experts are not paying attention to the documentary.
They say 'they're with Candace' as if the person explaining the legal situation has not understood (or 'believed') the documentary.
That isn't what the lawsuit is.
This is Brigitte When She Met Emmanuel Macron.
Update on the legal case against Candace Owens.
This is a big story because of the consequences of what podcaster Owens has done.
This article continues on 'Project Sitting Duck'
Well sourced legal opinion. There is very much a strong case that Owens will lose this. She HAS been given enough evidence to show she is wrong. The brother himself is shown in a photograph with her. He also filed the lawsuit in France. He isn't Brigitte. Therefore he was not an older man, who would have been 47 'grooming' a boy who was actually not underage. For this reason she is continuing with a 'reckless disregard for the truth'. It also seems she chose to ignore some of the proof given to her and left it out of her documentary and therefore did not continue with due diligence. If something is presented with 'malice' it means 'reckless disregard' or without due diligence.
Unfortunately if a product is produced and sold for money that also shows the 'disregard' was used for making money. Owens did produce a T shirt expressing her beliefs.
No-one wants to actually see what looks like the way this will go. This is going to be brutal and it looks like Owens can't win this.
President MACRON SUES CANDACE OWENS?!
She's Coming Out Swinging But Might Be COOKED! Lawyers Explain
Watch.
Seems the Macrons are not just going to sue Candace Owens but are going after a whole bunch of other podcasters on this issue, and according to this lawyer they have a very solid case. Can't imagine what all these other people said that could get them sued too. (It is rebroadcasting it that is the issue.) People like Joe Rogan, and Clayton Morris from Redacted.
Even beneath this lawyer video, the comments are still the same negative things. The case isn't about the age difference and so on.
Internet Comments for this video. *This is unbelievable that people aren't getting this. Read the comments beneath this video, whatever they are now, and they will still be this same stuff.
".I've watched every episode she's done and NONE of what Barnes is saying makes ANY sense."
So, this person has accepted as factual, that the relationship is incest, and also that they are involved in murder?
We have noted that this case looks like a trap.
Plus more NEWS following this section.
We think Trump may be replaced.
(An opinion). He is not getting the trade deals he wants, but he will probably have success with the Russia Collusion issue. He should be successful with the illegal immigration issue. However, there is a lot of damning stuff about his past, and he is also not well. He may chug along as president but really it wasn't Biden when all this stuff was going to crash, it was Trump - not what was expected at all. He was supposed to 'save the day' with a 'new system'. No way anyone would trust that now!
If people in a country work for the agenda of a different country that is not in the interests of their country, then our understading is that doing that is treason, or some form of treason. It looks like a lot people in the US government do place the interests and agenda of Israel ahead of those of America. Were these ones blackmailed by Epstein - possibly a foreign agent - to do this? That is why the Epstein case matters.
'An operation by a foreign government to blackmail those of another country to work for their agenda for what could be called, 'world domination'.' Continues below.
It can also be said that King Charles keeps mouthing off support for agendas that are not in the interests of the UK and that the British public emphatically DON'T want.
Trump's epic failure with trying to destroy Iran was supporting the agenda of a foreign country. It is not illegal to support the interest of another country but information could lead to it allegedly being part of a wider agenda to bring down the State of the USA. Trump ran for the presidency on a mandate of not getting into more wars, and that he was part of a movement to 'clean up the swamp'. It came as a surprise and betrayel when he enthusiastically joined in with bombing Iran.
It looks as if there is a 'white hat' operation, and Trump identified himself as working with the enemy by doing this. As such, it looks like he is being gradually removed - either by a more powerful 'dark side' for his failure, or by the 'white hats'.
Did Trump get Epstein arrested in 2006 because of an argument over a property deal which Trump cheated Epstein out of, leading to an arrest, release with an immunity deal, then rearrest in 2019? Trump paid 40 million for the property then sold it for $90 million not long after. Michael Wolff talks of money laundering.
It looks like he is now working on his legacy. His trade deals are not working and there is a very bitter post on social media about India and Russia, added below. Either way, it looks allegedly to be perhaps treasonous stuff involved, and a lot is coming out related to Epstein. It could be surmised that with his illness, Trump may have to leave office, and may later pass away. This is usually the type of cover story involved. Beyond that, he did fail with Iran, although not his fault, it was still a fail and the 'dark side' have decided on his removal.
With the information about how things would go in this "battle for the planet", it is not that it is a plan. The 'nothing can stop what is going to happen'. It is how a supercomputer projects it will go.
It was considered that all the crashes and WW3 were going to happen under Biden. But obviously they are hapening under Trump. Perhaps he was asked to run for president because he is exactly the person to upset other world leaders and introduce tariffs that others are now working round. Personal opinion on this is thatTrump had learned this stuff worked in business, probably crooked business, and it went to his head.
So, things will be exposed, countries will become free of the stranglehold control by a few, and by America, with a Donald Trump issuing literal commands to world leaders to obey him, there will be a WW3 situation but it will go to the brink of a nuclear event, not an event itself. (With the way that Trump was and still is issuing commands, it would seem that he was given wrong information about the forces of control in the world.)
In fact it might have been the computer itself that put out the information from 2020.
Thereafter there was an onslaught of fake information put out by podcasts and every other form of communication on the internet
and the ones who were listened to were those who were the 'types' who apparently appeal to the 'masses'.
The thing is with this is that all kinds of BS information can be put out there, and all kinds of BS information can be accepted as true by majority masses of people.
Donald Trump's use of information to get elected for example. Then it turns out he is pursing the globalist one world order agenda - because taking out Iran is part of that. It has nothing to do with their nuclear facilities. They have had the means to create nuclear weapons for over 20 years years.
In the world after the coming Pole Shift this kind of thing being possible is unlikely to be part of a 'God World' structure - is it?
Any number of people putting out their 'opinion' and making hundreds of milllions of dollars out of doing it. Fake information.
The more sensational it is and the more dramatically it is presented, can make those doing this extremely wealthy.
And the Candace Owens case is an example of how strongly people believe what is given out. Then there is 'Flat Earth', and so much more. All taken as gospel truth because it was said in a certain way, or came via an internet programme that wasn't mainstream, or because it was channelled and from space aliens.
The person who is going to make a killing from this is the French author of the book who shrewdly took this story to a very careless Candace Owens and has achieved all the publicity for book sales he could dream of. He can never be sued on this because he has some kind of protection. It is possible that he was even working with the two French women who first reported on this.
The Macrons will also do very well out of this.
They have played this perfectly, allowing Owens to get herself further and further into defamation. Their silence on this may have made it look like they were hiding something, but all they needed was a person to do what Owens did do, for them to have a fabulous case for seeking massive damages. Knowing this, why would they say, okay here is the blood test result?
There may be longterm results that lead to restrictions on 'freedom of speech' in a media context - what is put out there for a wider audience. There also maybe questions about why people who are duped into believing all kinds of wrongful 'conspiracy stories' should have a vote.
This continues with the 'Candy Comments'.
YOU can make sure important information gets out. Please post links to relevant pieces, this page, and videos to your social media.
Files from Czechoslovakia's spy service
(dailymail / Guardian / Bild / Czech television ) reveal the following about Donald Trump:
1. In 1977, Trump married Ivana Zelníčková, a Czech model.
2. Ivana regularly returned to Czechoslovakia to visit her father, Milos Zelnícek.
3. Trump had a personal relationship with the American president, believed to be Jimmy Carter (President from 1977).
4. In 1988, an informant, using the code name Milos, reported that Trump was being put under considerable pressure to run for the US presidency.
Trump was convinced he could win the presidency.
8. Ivana's father was registered as a 'confidant' of the Czech spy service.
Robert Maxwell, Ghislaine's father was Czech.
Models were imported into the US particularly from the former Czech countries.
*There is another issue here about Robert Maxwell who was Czech and obviously originally had a different name from Maxwell. There is a question about whether he or his family were former Nazis, or more specifically 'Black Sun' Nazi's. (Children of Darkness are 'Black Sun').
Please go through the videos given here which cover areas of interest. Together they provide a 'picture'. They are all connected to the investigation of an overall situation.
Pole Shift. Polarity Switch.
This refers to the actual point the 'energy streams' switch from the current 'Tree of Intellect' or Mind, and change over to the 'Eternal Living Streams of Love.'
It is hoped that the energy is a definite shift, and that those who do not live in the consciousness of Love are removed from this planet so that those who ARE living in Love, can live in Peace and Harmony. Those who live in this way can and will remain in the Eternal Worlds. Those who did not live in the consciousness of Love, but chose selfishness and their own interests entirely over others will be reincarnated again and tested again.
However, although you know there is a Great Cycle of around 25,000 years there maybe a bigger cycle of 780,000 years making this time now a very rare opportunity to be able to return to the Eternal Living Life/Light Energy Stream.
So who makes it through, and who doesn't make it? If you say to someone who is not loving and caring, that they are not kind (actually they may be a disgrace, but you can't say that!) they never understand, but a clue that they are that is a typical response they have to say something like 'get over yourself' and with contempt proclaim that you are a nasty, bitter person saying that - because that is how they interpret it.
Being KIND covers respect for those in your family, because families make up communities, and communities make up the citizens of a country. There are many countries in the world where KINDNESS is part of the ethic they oprate on as a country, and they do not have the problem of children behaving as shown in the photo below.. That has been part of the programming to break up families and the loyalty and support network that families should be.
Many tens or hundreds of millions of people will go on into a future that has changed to the Energy Stream of LOVE.
Not so many from the West though.
For reference.
Tucker Carlson and Ted Cruz interview.
Watch I have found it difficult to access the Tucker Carlson and Ted Cruz interview. I type it in and the browser only brings up a selection of Carlson with Trump and no Cruz at all! This is the interview linked here, but it has Russian (or something) sub-titles. Really worth watching this!!!! Maybe this helps with understanding why so many in America support Israel. This is absolutely crazy.
This news source aims to include information that helps us all with a better understanding of Iran.
We are learning too! But we do know that this is the land of the Persian Mystic Poet Rumi, and this video is not unlike that spiritual tradition. personally, we think the Iranian leader is not a bad person, but is literally the 'spiritual leader' This is only 4 mins and it is from 2023.
"Celebration of Angels" with Ayatollah Khamenei - Official Video (2023)
Watch 4 mins.
Rumi : "Look, This is love: .....to fly toward a secret sky,.......to cause a hundred veils to fall each moment."
Internet comments (people form all religions)
"What a leader of Iran !!! And these beautiful young girls are so inspired by their leader and his leadership!!!!!"
" salute you.....dear father of Islam...I'm Christian. but as Jesus loves children you are one of a kind leader.....Iranian people are lucky to have such a adorable person like you."
"Duper's Delight".
Watch "Duping delight, also known as duper's delight, refers to the pleasure or thrill someone feels when successfully deceiving or manipulating another person. This emotion can often be visible through inappropriate smiles or expressions of joy when a lie is successfully told."
Recommended videos. ... . Trump Collection ..... Talmud Teaching ..... Values et cetera that.seem to be 'good'.... Higher World and Lower Realm
American "education" v Russian Education.
The Aryan Jesus updated. ... . No connection whatsoever to the Jews and could not care less who the 'real Jews' are. ***More is now added to this article.
NEW. The Structure of the True Star Grid and the 'shadow version' Fallen Grid where everyone in 'this' world is trapped.
The Aryans --- Children of Light --- 'Changing of the Energy Streams' --- 'Judgment'
Continue