A fourth short page on the 'Therapeutae' health lifestyle topic.
Ballet for Exercise.
Plié
As a trained ballet dancer. which I did for 12 years before then embarking on a career as a professional dancer, the plié is one of the basic exercises that we always begin the class with.
Of course, when you then audition and are offered a contract to work with a company, some shows can include ballet, but mostly what we could call 'modern jazz' but meaning hip hop or reggaeton, and some cabaret engagements are often nicely choreographed dances, but the focus probably was on a group of pretty girls dressed in quite fugure revealing stage costumes! That aside, those costumes were always very pretty, sometimes we had 'showgirl' feathers (because that can still be part of cabaret tyoe show) and as mentioned further down, the most usual costume was a bikini which absolutely covered well,, but it looked good with the fishnet tights and high heels - which were a special stage shoe but definitely ended up with us looking like nice, long legged dancing girls! A high level stage show, such as the 'Phantom of the Opera', as an example, had very elaborate costumes and of course focussed on excellent dance, not 'pretty girls'.
But as you can see, those of us who trained professionally, and attended special professional schools, such as for example, the 'Royal Ballet School', we did train very hard, and you do actually go through grades in order to earn professional qualifications.
The exercises for ballet are a great foundation for a healthy life.
With the plié which is pronounced plee-AY, the picture below shows the basic sequence. There is no need to cover the arm positions for this,
To do this exercise, we will start in '2nd position' which means your heels are around hip width apart, not with the heels together as demonstrated with the starting position below. You hold onto the barre in a studio, or find something that replaces the barre that you can hold lightly onto. The picture shows the extended arm in 2nd position and her feet are in 'first position'.
However, we are extending that to '2nd position' so the legs are apart and the heels of the feet are not touching. There is no need to turn the feet out, but keep them nicely aligned and comfortable. Then you proceed to bend the knees to what is comfortable, keep the heels on the floor for this introductory exefcise, and hold that for a count of 5 or longer, then straighten up and repeat the sequence.
If you like, you can also try this exercise in the 'first position' which is the heels together and the toes lightly turned out.
You can also see the sequence of the arm movement if you want to add that. The extended arm moves downwards in a fraceful manner, then lifts forward upward in fron of you, then out to the side as you rise up from the plie.
The arm movement is very similar to Tai Chi movements, or Qi Gong, and what we are practising is the balletic way of going into a squat.
Keep it comfortable for you, but gently practising this will help you stregthen your legs, and the much lesser used muscles that are involved in the 'squat'.
Ballet includes movements that stregthen the ankles which are of tremendous importance to your body's ability to 'switch on' its communication system, and stregthen muscles which are hidden beneath your calf muscles and also helpful to 'switch on' the fascia. We will add some more exercises soon.
The next videos are not Therapeutae recommended topics! We will return to Therapeutae health and well being afterwards.
Entertainment section.
What Happens When A BODY TREND Starts To AGE? The BBL PROBLEM NOBODY Talks About .
Can You Imagine Why Any Woman Would Choose to Look This Grotesque Shape?
Watch This just shows you how ridiculous people are and that they behave like sheep doing what others tell them to do. Apparently these 'women' believe this is the body shaoe and look, that is 'desireable'. None of it is 'desireable'. It is clownish.
These shapes are absolutely disgusting. The women all look deformed and grotesque. That is the REALITY. This video also shows the ugly eyelash extensions and the big, fat ugly lips which all of these women truly believed made them look better!
No-one ever wanted to look 'thin'. Unless you are so insecure as to need to 'follow trends', no-one was especially going after being 'thin'. No-one ever pursued trying to create a flat bum look. The gym workouts were to create a naturally well shaped backside. If anyone thinks there were trends to do other than this, then that is 'being insecure'.
No-one was ever going after being 'big' and 'curvaceous' because it looks too fat, and also raises questions about body odour through the fat, and the blocked lymph. Let's call a spade a spade. This is an idea which has ruined what was previously the ideal example via 'Victoria's Secret' which reined supreme as the ideal - albeit unattanable for most - from 1997 through to 2019. It is their recent shows which are showcasing fat women and pretending it 'rocks it'. previously the look was fairly uniform through all the lingerie and swimwear models, and in recent shows and advertising there is a mish mash of body shapes that sends a message of confusion but never sends a mesage that it what women want to aspire to.
The most desireable and 'aspirational' female body type remains a slim, athletic, fit body with modest but adequate sized breasts, and a normal sized backside that is firm and well shaped. Legs are slim and long, but not thin. Natural looking eyelashes framing nice eyes remain the ideal, and a natural healthy looking mouth.
The fact that cosmetic surgery is nw widely accepted and talked about openly has led to unknown numbers of mainly females, feeling they need to change how they look, massive insecurity about how they look, and ridiculous levels of cosmetic surgery including the 26 year old we featured who felt she needed to do a facelift, which she did in Turkey, and basically has ruined her once pretty face. No-one shsould feel they need to do cosmetic surgery. No-one needs the grotesque BBL's which also is leading to a significant problem of fat necrosis and a disgusting, rotting smell which cannot be removed.
In the video the person called Melissa reveals a person who does not know how to look attractive. She's messed up her face albeit that it might qualify as a plastic created Mar-a-Lago look, and her BBL is a form of insanity to look as she does. She should have kept to the gym workouts.
All of these people are living in massive insecurity about how they look, and with an inability to accept themselves.
That is a very damaging place to live your life from and it does show they do not have confidence in themselves.
It is also an example of 'sheeple'. All these people, all the ones who do all the excessive cosmetic surgery, are doing it because they have been 'told' they need to do it. And they obey. They do not think for themselves.
There is nothing wrong with taking care of your self and your body. Doing that is a positive step. But doing all these precedures is unreaistic. In the Chinese videos many girls actually change their faces to look like a famous actress. In Korea, it has been commented that they all look alike.
Ironically this used to be how westerners perceived people from the east, because they seemed to 'look alike'. Then they developed their beauty and their own handsomeness and westerners could better see how attractive they were. Thereafter, a great many have tried to look like someone else instead.
Clearly, African Americans and the English of African origin are in the same kind of mindset. They want to look like someone else. They are insecure in themselves and do not think they, as they are, are good enough.
The Trend to Want to Look Like 'Someone Else'.
It can be commented that the BBL look is extremely unattractive, and whoever made that seem to be 'fashionable' or 'desireable' was lying.
It is also mentioned again about cosmetic equipment 'facials' which you usually have to to do about 10 of them at least every year, or sooner, using electronic equipment at a cost of at least $100 per session.
The practitioners who provide these 'facials' do have to learn to use the equipment, but there is not any of the original beautician training which was the case with what would now be called 'old school' facials. This is a serious amount of training that is missing. We do recommend the original type of facial with a good facial massage, because, amongst a number of benefit such as circulation etc, a good facial massage does help 'unglue' stuck fascia and allow muscles to return into their intended locations.
In fact good workouts to develop fascia automatically links between the feet, ankles and the gluts, and it is healthy to have the development of the gluts in that natural way.
The Cookie Cut Out 'Influencers' and Instagram Horror Story.
My first thought with these is that a great many of these girls really do think a lot of themselves. Yet there are so many of them that none of them is exactly standout different. I personally do not like the vanity side of this or the arrogance that accompanies this.
The second thought is that basically a lot of them want to get down to the sexy lingerie or swimwear look which is again because they want to show off this aspect of themselves.
Yet I have to say, that as a professional dancer who worked in numerous stage shows, this is mostly exactly what we were doing! Wewere given the costumes, but those costumes were very often bikinis or a 'sexy lingerie look'.
The difference is that the world now no longer supports all the career opportunities for a dancer in cabaret or stage shows, which is where the audience paid to see the show. BTW, this does mean nice costumes in good shows, but nevertheless, we were still dressed skimpily!!
In today's world of the internet, all sorts of girls have decided to present themselves in various displays of what they believe is their best 'attributes' and perhaps no-one needs to go to a stage show to see girls dressed like that. Not saying any of us dancers accepted contracts because of costumes, everyone did it because we loved dancing and the theatre, and it was our careers. We never paraded about in front mirrors or selfi-cameras (cell phones) admiring how we looked.
But now you have shop assistants, cafe workers, or essentially anyone, available to view on their Instagram or youtube channel.
You can see them doing their skin care and make up routine even though they are just, in many cases, any girls down the street who has decided you need to see this.
Of course, if you are getting information from actual 'stars' or people who are professional as in, it is their careers to know all their glow up secrets, then that is good. It is very helpful.
Really the comment or observation is that a lot of these girls are so full of themselves now, as if they are something special.
Not only that, it has been commented that the generation born from 2005 has grown up with the internet, filtered looks on Instagramand so to the extent that they now believe a person, even at the age of 28 is 'old' and irrelevant in the world.
They do not yet realise that they look as they do because they are the age they are but that it will change.
They were not born with better assets than someone who is now 28, 33, 41, or 50, or older.
It has also been pointed out that most of them are going to face a crisis when the natural progression of getting older kicks in, and they discover they do not remain forever looking as they thought they did.
They are also showing a very common look and it echoes the original revelation from an ancient E-Bay that you can sell anything.
Many of these ones, have also already done cosmetic surgery procedures for no valid reason other than they view it as the same as going to the hairdresser.
They ARE viewing that they themselves are not good enough as they are and need to 'improve'.
OR they believe they are extra good, and these are the ones charging money for men to book a date with them.
Everything is unrealistic and an illusion. But it also encouraging rudeness and contempt towards others - especially the difficulties of the elderly. The unrealistic bombardment of all the same thing is, has led to people who are less human, and definitely unkind.
This kind of thing is really bad for society. tt is a very dangerous thing to have all kinds of people putting out vidoes which then influence how the 'sheeple' think and behave.
If this continued, it would end civilization.
Why? Because the world would be full of people like this....then a high level developed civilization falls.
The British AND the European civilization WERE highly developed, positive functioning civilizations which were targeted to be dismantled by the intended NWO teams. To achieve this this, they began the insane open borders and immigration programmes. These were outright targeted to be dismatled by the the multi-faceted strategies which included the 'Swinging 60's' and the Tavistock Institute agenda.
Updated Oct. 20th 2026.
The world has gone from being a highly developed civilized world to the opposite of that, and world that is being dismantled before your eyes.
There are reasons for that, and it isn't just the immigration issue.
When we look at the Victoria's Secret shows, we began by looking at the best of the girls and about their fitness and health.
I never saw the VS shows. I did used to have the catalogue, but I don't know what the full shows were like before they stopped doing them in 2019.. I only saw the best of the 'top favourites' and they were stunning.
The girls were not skinny, starved models. That is for fashion shows. These girls had to put on real muscle, train hard - which is their choice if they want the job - and the diets they pre-show had to keep to, was not unhealthy. Many of us choose to juice fast, or have light meals. They needed to have protein to build the muscles. The reality some girls were chosen and some were not. It was also about their charisma on the stage, and their 'look'.
But that is just about the 'fitness and health' aspect.
It is also noted that the VS supermodels did pull off the sexy look with dignity and class.
That does not mean all of them were actually as classy as they portrayed. However, pulling off 'sexiness' with dignity and class is massively important.
What we are seeing is the final stages of the 'social programming' to degrade humanity. The show dropped having the best models who presented as sexy but NOT sexual. This is the problem everywhere today. We've looked at endless 'Influencers' who think they are 'VS standard' - which they are not. A lot of it is because they are cheap and sexual no matter what they do with their make-up and hair. This is an important difference. It is the difference.
The girls and Influencers and 'content creators' across the board think they are now 'special' but the arrogance and vanity is through the roof. If you mingle amongst them they are superficial, catty, bitchy, unkind, unrealistic, and their sexual behaviour is like an alley cat. They somehow think that they are the first generation to know do hair and make-up and exercise. We have really bad stuff happening with these labels being put on 'Generations' as if everyone has to be in a category.
The other real problem is the modelling jobs going to the children of the already rich, uber rich, and famous.
Many of the nepo kids of uber rich and successful people are in the current VS show. They do get all the modelling jobs. The normally required height for a model is around 5' 8" and maybe 5' 7" could scrape. Kate Moss's daughter Lila is now a model but she is well under height at 5' 6".
Heidi Klum is 5' 9" and her daughter is now a model. She is 5' 2" and that is absolutely not okay for a model.
The Importance of Your Brain's Ability for 'Critical Thinking'.
Most people are not able to think for themselves. They have a need to 'fit in', identify with others, and cannot spend even 15 minutes alone with their own thoughts. Information, and reporting events or analysis of those events, is not presenting that someone is "on the side of what the report or information is", it is presenting the information or report. It is up to a person's ability for critical analysis to evaluate that. If you have to change your understanding or even go against what others think, so what?
Presenting 'trends' is for programming - telling people what to do. And they do. They also follow each other and look everywhere to be told what to do next. Why are they like this? This is also the role of 'influencers'.
"Victoria Secret Needs To Stop Having Big Models," Women Are Disgusted At the Diversity At the Show
Watch 11 mins. This is about 'critical thinking'.
Corrected version Oct. 22nd.
FYI I never used to watch the VS shows, but I saw some of it and did know about OG girls, and I also researched some of this and clearly there is and was a reason why they were so famous and applauded. I was not overly interested in the shows but as said, I did used to buy the underwear. However, there was something so fundamentally bad about the return shows which bagan in 2024, even looking like drag queens in some circumstances, and the issue of the nepo babies - the kids of successful people simply being given the jobs and walking over everyone else who would work hard to get those jobs. It is also an unattractive show and in some cases a 'clown show'.
In fact it borders on equal to the 'gym whores' and reduces some of the models, or perhaps its the dancers, to 'a bunch of everyday slags' instead of 'stunning and classy' OG standard.
Because there is a difference between being sexy and fun, and being sexual - because only the few know how to be 'sexy and fun'.
It is disturbing to watch this show (the excerpts of it.).
Because of the overallness of this I make a point of not buying Victoria's Secret stuff.
Apparently the VS show has happened, and a 'short legged' Kylie Jenner wore the 'famous' fantasy bra as she lamely walked along the runway, and it was NOT a 'great walk'' It was a nepo kid doing the job that should go to the professionals. The problem is the best modelling jobs are going to all the elite, priviledged children of people who already have so much money they do not need these jobs. This is what is happening.
Oct. We've done a bit more research, because we were going with others reported, but it seems that Kendell Jenner did walk the VS shows from 2015. However she was never an 'Angel' and the special feature of wearing the 'Fantasy Bra' always goes to an 'Angel'. This is why people said the extra publicity of wearing this was paid for. It became a role that someone - nobody celebrities - could buy.
And remember what these "celebrities" do to get noticed and become a money making product themselves.
Aren't there other females in the world who warrant being discovered as Victoria's Secret models and 'angels'? Why is it all the same families hogging all the available jobs?
Clearly the current VS show is going to be another washout that causes controversy. People want the OG girls back or at least new ones who are that standrad. And they ain't got it!
So VS gets the publicity, just as H & G did all the PR and got publicity BUT is anyone going to buy this brand as they used to? And what are the Markles going to make out of their publicity? No-one wants her to wear their fashion and be an ambassador, and therefore get paid for it. So who buys VS crap underwear now?
Okay, we've watched some of it. lameduck opener. Don't know if she's an OG but she doesn't look it. (Turns out it was nepo kid Bella Hadid.) Seems the new thing in underwear is a little mini sjirt slip. Followed by someone dressed in what looked like a big flower. (Apparently one of the better and established but lesser known OG models - hidden in a big flower.)
Gigi Hadid has a model's body but does not have the VS body for this. Her walk was laborious and there was no personality. She is in the picture for the show, and Gigi Hadid is a nepo kid whose mother was a successful model. Another nepo kid was the 'high-profile debuts of models like Kobe Bryant’s daughter Natalia Bryant. In 2024 the show included Kate Moss's nowhere near VS standard daughter. Another nepo kid.
Very mediocre artists performing. This is going to be about 'stripclub' level 'entertainers', that's where its heading. No names. Since the 2024 comeback, the 'entertainers' are now skanky popstars, not the real entertainers. They are now all females and mostly undressed as if they are the models, which they are not.
It is about the degeneration of standards, billionaires buying their way into the jobs others have worked for, it is about skanking up females as the way to go.
There is a significant lack of understanding about 'being sexy' and being sexual and whore-like which also covers the difference between a Soho street level striptease show, and a lingerie show for people who have the intelligence and preference to be considerate people in everyday life, but want something sexy and fun for their private lives.
Private lives is the point.
The same with the additional topic of Israel using Honey Trap "actresses" in the same way as the Israeli run Porn Hub, to degrade and degenerate humans.
This is why 'ordinary' and 'influencers' and 'gym horz' prove they do not know how to represent 'quality' or 'sexy' (they can only do 'sexual' and that is the massive difference in value.)
One more comment video and we're done!!!
The Victoria's Secret Clown Show.
Victoria's Secret 2026 show was mostly 'taken over' by the Kardashians and again its the nepo baby agenda with one of the daughters taking real models' jobs away.
We have watched mostly the whole show now and remain disappointed.
We don't like where this is going now and will not watch this show again, and will not pursue future commenting!
This work is not about where society is now, it is about the indoctrination into 'reverse-negative' consciousness.
So, we have watched the show, and it does not have the glammed up sexiness of the original OG Victoria's Secret energy. I myself did work in showbiz where we wore similar things as costumes for the show. Not the thongs though. Our backsides were covered!
The weird collection of body types is a bit off putting. One girl had very large wobbling thighs which looked that way because she had put a luminous pearl body lotion and it caught the light badly making it look like her big thighs were massive and wobbling! If she was more professional she would have known not to do this. Some really odd shapes and a very chunky one or two.
Another one of these was the daughter of a well known actress and this one wore an outfit that was basically nude, and really this is the 'hotter' end of the direction VS is going. Eventually the models, if they are real models, will be expected to be mostly nude, and sexual rather than pulling off 'sexy', and that is not really showing off the underwear, the lingerie. The sexy see through thing should really have something to see underneath. Totally understood that this is fine for the personal relationship setting, but you've got to be good to carry this off in public Having Katseye as the entertainment is featuring a tacky girl group.. Not the best choice but low price to book. o idea who the other female singer was, but it was more effective to have a male guest or band.
The premise of the 'dark agenda' is that women or females ARE 'naturally whores' That is what is believed, and that is a reason why it is so important to present this in a way that shows the higher standards.
One attitude covered is "bad girl" with the music. But you don't have to be a "bad girl" just because you are happy with your relationship or that you are looking for real love. . There is nothing "bad girl" about it.
It becomes "bad girl" if its implying the interest is like an alley cat. That you think love is sex. VS lingerie has always represented some spice in your real relationship. It is NOTHING to do with being a "bad girl" which is about being an alley cat, gym horz, and all the revolting girls on Instagram and Only Fans. .And that seems to be where VS is heading.
It is a skill to differentiate and project that difference.
Plus several or all of the 'nepo models' had had cosmetic surgery to alter how they look, and to look like other people.
Megyn Kelly read an 'outrage comment' that dressing like this invites rape and the script she read was saying 'no it doesn't'. We say this is lingerie, so go for it with what you wear. It's not out in the streets or at the gym. The issue is when females DO dress like this in public. It absolutely does encourage rape, and whatever anyone says, men see this as 'available woman' and probably easy. That is what it signals. Women do like to get out there and show their bodies. The overall consideration of society, is do it privately.
**We don't think the VS show as it was in its best years from 2000 to maybe 2015 or something was irrelevant. It was not irrelevant, it was a good 'show' - and it is a show - but they had girls who had style, charisma, self respect, were pretty, and showed nice personalities and dignity.
Internet Comments : "Honestly most of these models have NO aura. compare them to models of the 90's for example..."
"The brand is dead."
"It is very upsetting to see some nepo famous people who got the chance to walk on that runway with zero modeling experience while other models who are willing to do anything to be in ther place are being rejected after months of training."
"It is mind boggling what passes for attractive these days."
"On wow, I've not seen VS in over decade and it really did drop the standard to 'anyone' will do... Great to hear being VS model no longer means anything."
The OG standard model is not thin and starved to 'lose weight'.
The OG model requires muscles and muscles add weight. They were asked to be fit, athletic and toned.
We are also being led to accept far lesser standards, or sub-standard, yet to rave about it as if it is something special. This is the interpreation Gen Z have about their world, when much of it is not talented, and not 'supermodel' status.
One content creator saw Kylie Jenner as the surpise unveiled for the 'Fantasy Bra' and she said "even better than Michael Jackson".
Why in any sane universe would this person be lauded for ANYTHING? She is not a great star, a great talent in some form of artistic endeavour, she is not anything. Why would anayone think this person being unveiled was so great??? This is a problem with the programming of this world that people worship mediocrity and/or nothingness. They don't know about great authors, or great actors, or about previous great entertainers or musicians.
These are comments on a video we decided not to put up here. They do have skanks up there, with the real OG's who know how to do this without being a skank. There was a video shsort about Alex someone 'bringing glamour' to the show, which we thought was a someone making a joke about this person because she was quite ugly.
Why are we seeing the featured guest artists attired like the models promoting the product?
A CLOWN SHOW!
The guest artists should complement the models, not be amongst them. The models are the ones who sell the image of the product.
They had Megan Thee Stallion who was interviewed and sounded like, and looked like, a street worker of the kind you see in the viral clips of African Americans beating up other women. Remember, women can be poured into a shapewear structured dress and look good. She was the artist/entertainment but she was dressed in her stage cotume, which was very little, and that was not promoting Victoria's Secret lingerie. She should just be the entertainer.
In 2024 they had Lisa which K-Pop kept trying to foist onto western audiences. Then in 2025 there was Madison Beer. All were like a distraction from the actual VS models yet dressed as less standard versions of the the VS girls. We wonder why VS is doing that?
Megan Thee Stallion was very sexual, not sexy, and very undressed. She was also on the runway as an angel and did not have the figure for that - except by the 'inclusivity' standards they have now. From the side this did not look good. Her on stage performance was okay for her type of pop concert, but in parts, 'street level striptease show level'. This was just not good enough. But why was she undressed like that when this is a Victoria's Secret show? She was the guest artist.
Tate Macrae, whoever she is, was one of the entertainers yet up there dressed as one of the models and prancing about the stage as an amateur copy of what the models do. Her walk was dreadful, absolutely dreadul, and her abdomen was bloated out in some of the movements which showed she did not workout as much as is needed for this role. It was not good. Why are the guest artists dressed like the models? The models are PROFESSIONALS at what they do.
Making the guest artists dress like the models, is diminishing the impact and effectiveness of the actual models who are promoting the product.
This tattier level should not be in VS unless that is the brand's goal to make it street level. It makes the underwear not special enough to want to buy it. They have also made it about silly gossip and PR round that, the overall show was kind of like Meghan Markle would do it.
Many of the girls looked sloppy, not toned, and like the girls you would see wiggling around like Tate or Epstein recruits, in a typical pop music video. *If they don't want the negative comments, they should not do the show unless they are OG standard.
The show does not have the glamour, or the energy or the charisma that it had attained in its heyday.
Adriana Lima did look absolutely stunning and her body was equal to how it ever was, although she is now 45.
THIS is what we want to see. The news sources are still making snide remarks about how she has 'altered her face'. Really when she puts on weight, her face gets bigger, and when she tones up her body to her standard, her face is much slimmer. It isn't surgery.
'KYLIE JENNER RUINED VICTORIA'S SECRET SHOW, BELLA HADID STRUGGLES ON RUNWAY AND ADRIANA LIMA QUITS'
We're not including the video of that title. .
The real VS 'supermodels' should all quit, and not associate themselves with this. .
To us, the question is 'who is Kylie Jenner' and 'who are the Kadashians' because we've never seen any of their stuff,
we just know they are part of the 'reality trash shows' and very disgusting people. Obviously this possibly paid for appearance - she paid to be there - was also promoting Timothee Chalomet's career.
Is the show going to deteriorate into who can PAY to be in it?
We do encourage everyone to exercise and become fit and healthy and NOT obsess about other body shapes, or types of looks. Just get fit and healthy yourself.
Also drop the fat lips, the excessive eyelashes, and the cheap looking very long nails especially with nail art regardless of how espensive it was.
Death and unnecessary cosmetic surgery.
'Ordinary' is not a great example. Healthy rejuvenation and wellness but starts with a look at the 'low standards'. Updated July 21st.)
Also updated Aug. 23rd because we've just seen some of the 2025 VS show and added 6 mins of that.
Brand trial day 5: Brand became 'wide-eyed maniac', second alleged victim tells court
Watch 12 mins. We've only ever heard of Russell Brand within the desciptions he is on trial for. How do you think men who are like this description interpret the 'gym horz' and other related dressing and behaviour?
'What are you doing? I've literally just met you' Jury hears about alleged Soho bar rape | Episode 5
Watch 16 mins. The women were dressed modestly not 'gym horz'. The question is about how men perceive women.
'I felt like I couldn’t speak or breathe,” says woman who accuses Russell Brand of rape
Watch 12 mins.
Plenty of Nuts About.
There's a clip of a dike who is an Anglican clergyperson, saying that God is trans. There is sweet little Charlotte Church on stage raving that Ed Sheeran supports genocide. And there was a music awaards show, something to to do MTV whicj nne of knew was still a thing, but it included the long surviving fake creation that is 'Madonna' attaching herself again to the young but profoundly untalented Sabrina Carpenter. We'll return to that because the old girl is the first topic. Madonna is regarded as an icon for creating the 'cone boobs and so on. So let's fact check.
The comment is about how the satanic music industry simply creates stars of people who will sell out to be undressed and sexual on stage,
that they grab the adolation of children - which is the market the bosses want to capture so they will spend their pocket money and then future earnings idolising someone who is nothing but a fake image. It is also about the 'programming' to sexualize children, for the children to think these freaks on their side and 'understand them', and then everything that leads to Epstein, or Diddy parties.
Entertainment.
Meghan Markle Still on a Mission to bring Down the British Royal Family.
Markle does think she has a 'mission' to 'equalize' all people but has misunderstood the role of the Royal Family, and also has carried out her mission with extraordinary rudeness and bad manners. She does not undersiand that the 'Royal Family' is a job which represents a standard of behaviour and dignity. The people who are at the forfront of that role carry out their duties exctly with the dignity, diplomacy, grace and charm that is expected of them. It is also a role of Diplomat. No-one should underestimate how much a valuable asset having the royal family is.
Not for Meghan Markle whose unending lack of comprehension and rudeness stuns everyone! Meghan Markle could not do the job of being a working royal, and she could never be placed in the role of a diplomat!
She also does not know how to dress well. The number of her mismatched and scruffy outfit choices has gained many comments. For her Afternoon Tea at Claridges she did the same as most of her choices before. She got it wrong.
Continue. A first I thought she had the same wide pants I have bought recently, but mine are harem style, and hers are very much more expensive. Her choice of coat is okay I think, and so would be the pants except they are crumpled/unironed, and they are too long and baggy on her, the cashmere top is so neutral that it looks like a mismatched colour choice, as if it was meant to be the same as the pants but it isn't quite. A thin leather belt in tan which matched/blended with the coat would have pulled the outfit together better. She also needed a better shoe than a loafer. But the real glaring faux pas is the shopping bag she has chosen! Hugely overpriced at 7000 GBP for a Chanel beach bag or some such thing. This does not work at all.
Every news source is commenting on the cost of the awful outfit. In reality the ridiculous bag is what the price up at 7000 GBP. The Ralph Lauren pants, were a normal 700 GBP, and the coat was fairly average. The loafers were a waste at the high price they were, but the worst and most unnecessary thing was that shopping bag.
There is plenty of awful fashion with the shows for 2027. But this is a good one to look at.
Vivienne Westwood Menswear | Spring/Summer 2026 | Milan Fashion Week
Watch 6 mins of impressive male fashion from Vivienne Westward.
This is from last year, but it came up while we were looking for the menswear Micro-shorts for the 2027 collection. These are men's 'fashion' of tiny shorts which are cut up higher at the back to show the buttocks - just as they do for females now!
To think, that over the fairly recent decades those who expect the world to 'obey' them, have gone from swimsuits, to bikinis, to making women show as much of their boobs as possible and believe it is 'modern world'. Then in more recent decades it has been about showing the buttocks - not for beachwear, but for when a female is out and about in town, wearing shorts, but cut to show the buttocks..
Eventually, those expect the world to 'obey' them will have people completely undressed and they will think they are being 'open minded' and fashionable', a kind of 'forward thinking' moron.
This way, those who expect everyone to 'obey' will have taken people back to an undressed anaimal status - which is what they believe most people are.
'Upper Realm' Behaviour.
This is always based on consideration for others. Imagine if you paid to live in a beautiful area so you could enjoy the peaceful beauty it represented. No one minds people enjoying a public park, or those practising Tai Chi in the area, or taking their dogs for a walk. But what happens if the beautiful area has been discovered by 'influencers' or anyone posting their stuff to Instagram and that they creating stunts every week?
The next story is about people filiming a "marriage proposal". First of all this isn't a marriage proposal, this is a staged creation of a marriage proposal to be posted to Instagram or Facebook. The point that is upsetting the local residents is that there are people filming these stunts every week!
The videographer is not an independent visoegrapher, she is the sister of the person being filmed. When the person who is exasperated with this kind of stunt happening every week says that this is happening every week, the 'videographer' only understands that they weren't there last week. That shows some lack of understanding about why the lady is upset.
This stunt also involves a Mariarchi band which certainly is noisy and disturbing the peace. In reality, people who are going to do stunts like this should have to apply for a permit and in consideration of the integrity of the parkland, the numbers of approvals for this kind of thing should be limited.
If these people want all the Mexican stuff, why shouldn't the lady say 'go back to Mexico'? Isn't that what most nationals of the countries who are dealing with unwanted immigration saying?
In the interview with the 'bride to be' in a story that the news reporter should have considered more about it's relevance, the 'bride to be' expresses that she should have an apology.
despite that every post replying to this video thinks the lady complainig was wrong, these people should apologize to the lady and to all the residents of the area and everyone else who uses this park.
If behaviour and wrongful interpretation of people's "rights" continue in this thoughtless and inconsiderate way, people will be driven from their homes and communities will be divided.
What is happening is that people with higher intelligence and higher standards are being subjugated to a 'consciousness' that is a much lower level. Those who are the 'lower level' are always in conflicts with others, always suffering from 'offended egos' making vile judgements on others because things that relate to their misperception of themselves. Those doing always misunderstand the bigger picture, and even if you explain the situation it's usually over their heads to understand it. They think it is the person being mean, or bitter, or accusing them of wrong doing (not that it may have been explaining the issue and the problem.)
With this video, it is accusing a woman clearly upset that her public park is being misused for stunts, apparently every week, and she is also accused of being racist. If this kind thoughtless stunt is what they do in Mexico, why shouldn't she say what she said if she and other locals don't want this kind of thing? THis petty, judgemental response, embarassing this lady even on a TV broadcast is also unkind because she has a right to be upset and express it.
If this kind of inconsiderat behaviour overwhelms a previously well functioning society, then it is the well functioning society that is destroyed. Not 'fair go' for everyone, but the outright destruction of peaceful, considerate society. The same is happening in the Cotswolds.
The TV channel should have given more consideration to this atrocious report.
Laguna Beach 'Karen' Interrupts Proposal With Racist Outburst
Watch
The woman complaining is right. people staging marriage proposals for a film is the same as tourists invading and ruining the Cotswolds, and influencers performing stunts to get viewers. It is a violation of people's rights, especially for those who live in an area they want to peacefully enjoy living in.
More is to be added to this topic.
|